To what extent can this "superflock" pecking system be observed in competitive academic environments? What type of leadership from reading 2 would this type of environment foster?

Heffernan states that the only way the most productive can achieve such exceptional relative productivity is by suppressing the productivity of others. Which leadership theories from reading 2 does her idea oppose?

Heffernan cites the Beijing Olympic horses issue and how a culture of helpfulness was able to easily resolve the situation. How is this a more preferable style of leadership compared to coercive leadership as described in reading 3?

Which two styles of leadership mentioned in reading 3 are directly being compared and evaluated when Heffernan describes the incentives of social capital vs money? Which style do you personally agree with?