<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Considering the decision in the above Case Study, discuss how the Syariah Court balances the principle of expediency with the parties&#39; existing recourse to the civil courts when determining ancillary matters related to divorce, in particular, custody and access. by Nur Dinah</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/nurdinah00/lxaqqpsxuftkueul</link>
      <description>Post your response to the discussion topic by clicking the plus button below.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-04-20 14:25:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-04-28 05:22:58 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nurdinah00/lxaqqpsxuftkueul/wish/3427416974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Assessor testing</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-28 05:22:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nurdinah00/lxaqqpsxuftkueul/wish/3427416974</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
