The evaluators will go through each task, list all the problems or difficulties for the auditory impaired users.

Advantage of using this evaluation is the evaluators can simply play the role of ordinary users and try learning and exploring how to use the system to accomplish required tasks based on the difficulties of the disabled user to use it. 

There is actually no much difference between them and the real users. The whole process often goes quite fast with all important issues spotted and noted down. 

Futhermore Cognitive Walkthrough is it is very good at identifying certain issues regarding how easy or effective a user without previous knowledge can pick up using it. This can be very useful to some types of systems which do not impose a difficult learn process on users.

Then the principal of using this evaluation is it can handle larger or more complex tasks where increase the time-consuming to perform. The technique is often used in some altered form such as the evaluation can be recorded on video and the evaluator can then verbally explain the actions at each step.

As we know, emotional response linked to physical changes.  these may help determine a user’s reaction to an interface. Besides that, An accessible website will attract potential deaf customers and it will promote my company in a positive light because it shows that i am aware and inclusive.

Besides that, some difficulty in interpreting these physiological responses, so we need to do more research. So i will research that Is my website fully accessible for deaf people?

It’s surprising how many companies don’t actually provide reasonable contact details for deaf/HOH people and it makes life much more difficult for them. So i will do more research about Physiological so that my website fully accessible for deaf people such as :

1. Use simple English in my website.

Avoid using jargon and use words that would likely be spoken by our target community. For some deaf people, English isn’t their first language (Sign Language might be). Keep to the point. If we are advertising a service or product, think what is the key information we want people to know? Use simple short sentences. Images also help to illustrate the topic.

2. Subtitle/caption in our videos!

It really bothers me when there aren’t subtitles on videos, especially on websites, because I can’t follow them. I’m a lip reader and often can’t hear what is being discussed on videos. Automated live streaming captions are often accurate – including Youtube’s automatic captions.  If accurate captions aren’t option for videos, try providing a written transcript. Perhaps consider sign language videos too.

Alt text should be provided for images, so that screen reader users can understand the message conveyed by the use of images on the page. This is especially important for informative images (such as infographics). When creating the alt text, the text should contain the message you wish to convey through that image, and if the image includes text, that text should also be included in the alt. The exception to this rule is when an image is used purely for decoration; in this case, the alternate text could be left empty so that the screen reader user is not distracted from the more important content on the page.

Often structured in a top down style, starting with general questions about the task, and moving on to more leading questions like WHAT IF ? WHY?

This evaluation must ust be well planned in advance, with central questions prepared.  This may be important to ensure consistency between interviews from different interviewees, and by different interviewers. 

From the lecture 3, i would choose query technique as type of evaluation for develop webpage for auditory impaired users. Query Technique includes interview and questionnare.The advantage of interview are issues can be explored more fully and identify unanticpated problem. For example, interview people face to face that bring people like deaf people to learn something interactive using interview session. So that help me to identify what users needs and they may have different opinion.It also can give me feedback about suggestion and improvement.
 Besides that, i needs questionnare techiniques to prepared for my target users so that it can improve and debug problem that related with my webpage.Plus the advantages of this can be analyzed more rigorously.   

Based on lecture 3 lessons, I would choose a heuristic evaluation. This is because for me this evaluation is one of a good technique that can be used to evaluate designs. This evaluation is specially involve an evaluators to examine the interface and judging its compliance with recognized usability principles. Moreover, the usability criteria on this type of evaluation are easily identified. Heuristic evaluation requires only one expert, reducing the complexity and expended time for evaluation. These evaluation methods are now widely taught and practiced in the new media sector, where UIs (User Interfaces) are often designed in a short space of time on a budget that may restrict the amount of money available to provide for other types of interface testing. There a few example of heuristic evaluation that can be made which is the system behaviour is easily predictable, consistent and the feedback is provided. Generally, this type of evaluation can help the users to recognize, diagnose, and recover from any errors occurred easily. It also can gather information that is easy to search, focused on the user's task and also listing the concrete steps to be carried out. 

- (color) besides, my opinion is the use of color is one of the initiative for auditory impaired users because color is considered universal language. if there are users who are lacking in reading, color can help them in answering questions.

When we want to build a web page, for users we need to evaluate the web page so that we know how far the effectiveness of the web page we build is based on feedback revived. In query techniques evaluation there are two methods of interviews and questionnaires. Both are ideal for assessing people with hearing disorders. Using the method of interviews, developers only need to get information related to the webpage by interviewing the user in advance via sign language. These can be helpful in getting information quickly and clearly. In addition, through the questionnaire, the developers are able to receive various feedback regarding the user experience related to the web page to be developed. 

Having these three types of auditory impaired users to participate in this research is crucial for us to study more about their disabilities. The studies can be carry out in the lab along with specialist equipment and guide by a some one who is professional in auditory impaired users

Therefor  in my opinion, it is wise to use this type of evaluation to determine what is more appropriate to include in the webpage for these auditory impaired users

Vanakam and Good day to everyone, based on lecture chapter 3, the type of evaluation that I will used if need to develop a webpage for auditory impaired users are query technique because query techniques involve questioning the user directly about their experience of using the system under evaluation.  This may be done face to face as an interview, or in writing as a questionnaire. If face to face interview, will arrange one communicator that have a good skill of explaining for auditory impaired users.  Questionnaire is set of fixed questions given to users. based on the results of questionnaire can create a good website to auditory impaired users.

 

Although this technique is very subjective and time consuming to do, but I sure this technique of evaluation will help to gain more information. 

Hi..Good day everyone..After went through lecture 3 which is based on evaluation techniques, I’ve learned the importance of choosing those techniques based on usability and functionality of a system. In my opinion, the type of evaluation technique which is suitable to develop a webpage for auditory impaired users are query techniques. This is because, those techniques is able to get user's viewpoint directly. Other than that, level of questioning can be varied to suit the context. 

There are two methods in query techniques. Firstly is Interviews- Known as face to face communicating which is able to understand preferences, impressions and attitudes of the others. For impaired users they just could answer the interview questions and can deliver their opinion via speech if they able to speak or by write the answer to the interviewer. Although it will delay the time but the interview known as one best way to get a good feedback and more flexible. 

Other than that, the more simple way is by answering the questionnaires. The questions will be fixed in advanced as multiple choices questions or a few subjectives questions. Users just need to answer those questions which is acceptable to them. This technique is takes less time to answer and easy to get feedback. 
Thank you..:)

The query techniques involve questioning the user directly about their experience of using the system under evaluation.  This may be done face to face as an interview, or in writing as a questionnaire. The purpose was to Get user's viewpoint directly. This types of evaluation is appropriate and will make it easier for us developer to creating a good webpage that include unlimited usability and functionality of a system. Thank you . 

Interviews can be very subjective and time consuming but it can identify unanticipated problems. Interview can give us views  and identify unanticipated problems as a step towards improving my web pages development. It will be more effective to gather the information faster.

For questionnaires, the questionnaires that use must can be analyzed more easy, quick and reaches in large user group. If we use questionnaire we can know what the user want from the system that we build.But, I have to ask the truthful responden so that the answers given are true and not made because they are forced.

Thank You.

If I need to develops a webpage for auditory impaired users. I will choose use query technique which obtains interviews and questionnaires. I prefer to use questionnaires because I can easily evaluate and analyze the data from the answered questionnaires. If I choose interviews evaluations, it must be conducted by who understand sign language and are specifically trained to work with them. In conclusion, questionnaire can be conducted in a large scale where it is more faster to obtain the data.