The robust process and timeline surrounding a QM review

Helpful support through the Rubric Workbook with clear guidelines, annotations, etc.

The identified alignment pieces that must be met.

The extensive robust training and requirements needed to become a QM reviewer.

How long the review process takes.

That no one but the lead reviewer will see the course responses/outcomes.

I was surprised about how thorough the rubric is.

I was impressed with the depth of the annotation section of the rubric and I think it'll be very helpful in building courses.

I was unaware of the length of the review process.

Learning how to apply the QM Rubric to assess and improve course design.

The focus on the alignment so that all major course components work together to support learners was very helpful. And the note that some pieces of alignment must be met for a course to be successful.

Course design is a reflective practice that with attention to detail and revision utilizing a consistent rubric will improve courses over time.