https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy Made with wonder en-us 2019-05-08 01:20:53 UTC 2026-03-21 22:14:40 UTC hello@padlet.com jayabremer https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357874053 2019-05-08 01:23:41 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357874053 jayabremer https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357874779 I think we need to consider  Kaner (see link and power point Day 7 weeks 5) for our stakeholder process. I also found info on page 438 and 439. Book Handbook of Disaster Research DEMN502. Than may be useful for limitations too]]> 2019-05-08 01:26:51 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357874779 https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357914942 Process (just a brainstorm idea)
Define the goal w primary stakeholders. City of Vancouver could play a facilitator/Liasion role (potentially the SH that have more to lose 
Steps
1. First approach FIFA, City of Vancouver
2. Vancouver, Federal and locals.
3. Vancouver, FiFA
4. Vancouver, secundary, and terciary SH.
5. Something like these.]]> 2019-05-08 05:29:26 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357914942 https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357916734 I did not find them to useful ]]> 2019-05-08 05:45:45 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/357916734 jayabremer https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358239408 Wow! Great article Sergio, this will be majorly helpful!

]]> 2019-05-08 20:26:20 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358239408 nicolasrbasque https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358281190 This is from a random engagement strategy I found online. The subject matter isn't important, but I like the approach.

Source: https://s21.q4cdn.com/589145389/files/doc_documents/EN/Stakeholder-Engagement-Plan.pdf

Section 5: Stakeholder Engagement Approach

Phase 1: Baseline Engagement. (We could give a general overview of the problem and what we are looking to prepare for without giving any details). 

Phase 2: Disclosure & Consultation Phase. (How much will it cost? What would the consequences be? What are the odds of this happening? What can we agree on? Etc.)

Phase 3: Ongoing Engagement. (Once an agreement has been reached, how are we going to move forward leading up to the event).]]> 2019-05-08 23:59:08 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358281190 blake_prince1 https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358448496 Baker, Ernest

Baker, E. (2012). Planning effective stakeholder management strategies to do the same thing! Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/planning-effective-stakeholder-management-strategies-development-6058

Baker presents a fairly state forward approach to building a stakeholder agreement. It surrounds people, process and communication. I see communication as being the most important aspect of the process.

There are 5 steps

1 - Identify stakeholders
2- Classify the stakeholders
3- Develop a Stakeholder Management Strategy
4- Plan for a stakeholder communication
5- Execute communication plan

There are a few more steps to this one but maybe doable.]]> 2019-05-09 13:13:50 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358448496 jayabremer https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358529841 1. Big initial meeting (online and/or in person)
-bring together stakeholders (primary/secondary...maybe tertiary)
-assess current policies/emergency plans 
-establish shared goals 

2. Idea Generation from stakeholders
-host a conference
-split into smaller groups with facilitators and field experts
-look for gaps in the emergency plans
-diverge and converge could be in here...
-each group brainstorms and submits their ideas (would it be an emergency plan proposal? What would it be that people are required to figure out)
-they are all collected and combined to start building a report based on participatory decision making and they are consensus driven

3. Plan for increased preparedness is put in place
-committee is formed to develop it
-various people can review, revise and finalize it. 

4. Stakeholders come back together (virtually or physically)
-to confirm the emergency plan meets the needs of the public and adequately prepares for an earthquake
and that everyone is on the same page, know what different stakeholders are involved, and who would be doing what in the case of an emergency. ]]> 2019-05-09 15:28:02 UTC https://padlet.com/jayabremer/lt1m8tzd5sdy/wish/358529841