https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd Made with swagger en-us 2017-04-12 20:03:01 UTC 2017-04-19 00:15:55 UTC hello@padlet.com 314250 https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166163042 Flast was one of a group of seven taxpayers who objected to use of federal funds to help support religious schools under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

]]> 2017-04-12 20:06:13 UTC https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166163042 314250 https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166163789 1. The Frothingham decision does not mean that a taxpayer may never challenge the constitutionality of an act of congress.The plaintiffs in this case have a personal stake in the outcome of the case and should be allowed to proceed.
2.The 1st Amendment Establishment Clause limits Congress power to collect taxes in support of religious.The plaintiffs role as a taxpayer gives them a direct and concrete interest in the outcome of the case,
 ]]> 2017-04-12 20:11:59 UTC https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166163789 314250 https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166164838 1. The requirement that plaintiffs have sufficient standing helps prevent unnecessary lawsuits by ensuring that only those with serious stake in outcome bring cases.
2. People with no special interest in a controversy besides the tiny amount of their taxes that may be involved should not be allowed to sue in federal court. ]]> 2017-04-12 20:19:40 UTC https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166164838 314250 https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166901195 Flast was one of a group of seven taxpayers who objected to use of federal funds to help support religious schools under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

]]> 2017-04-19 00:10:47 UTC https://padlet.com/314250/lppx1huvfhd/wish/166901195