<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Seeing Stars by S.J. Teach</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks</link>
      <description>MIchelin or Google</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-03-01 02:58:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-03-02 11:25:41 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Group 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073371674</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Question 1: M star rating has other agenda. The branding is associated with other sponsors thus not neutral.&nbsp;<br>Question 2: Heard instinct - Follow the majority opinion.&nbsp;<br>Calibrate our expectation to be in line with the majority.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-02 11:23:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073371674</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073371848</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Michelin Guide&nbsp;<br>- vested interests, sponsorship and partnerships with STB, RWS.&nbsp;<br>- anonymous food inspectors (past), but it is not anonymous today (unethical).&nbsp;<br>- lack of other cuisines (more western food).<br>- more food in the CBD.&nbsp;<br>- The main issue that our group spotted: rubrics are not clear at all!&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-02 11:23:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073371848</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073372417</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sponsorship programme not clear<br>The anonymity of assessors<br>Selection resulted in lack of diversity&nbsp;<br>and Location.&nbsp;<br>Rubrics seems to be ambiguous. Which leads to a washback effect that may not be favourable to the lay consumer.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-02 11:23:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073372417</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073372477</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Herd instincts n social influence bias. Nothing is trustworthy. Influenced by other people’s ratings. Need to have our own minds to think n decide. - group 4.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-02 11:23:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073372477</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073375035</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Problem with online ratings<br>-Social influence from reading others’ readings.&nbsp;<br>-Paid reviewers/influences may give skewed results.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-02 11:25:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sjtlearnings/Bookmarks/wish/2073375035</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
