<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Love in America Supreme Court Cases by Savannah McIntyre</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1</link>
      <description>Post a 2-4 sentence summary of your Supreme Court case. Make sure to include the amendment that is discussed in your case. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-02-22 18:46:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-16 16:26:50 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Roe vs. Wade </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295550</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Women should be allowed to get abortions because it is their life that will be affected whether in a good or bad way. This also stated in the 14th amendment that no state shall deprive anyone of life, liberty, or property.<br>~mekaylind</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295550</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roe vs wade </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295603</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Abortion <br>14th amendment <br>shakur and julieh</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/359101352/63c6108f92c4367056ac53aee6f346f9/image.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295603</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Carlos </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295651</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>My Case was  about Child Abortion which I do not agree with. I don’t agree because I personally think that Abortions are truly cruel and unfair to unborn children/infants. The Amendment that was explained in the article was the 14 Amendment.     DMR</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295651</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Love vs Texas </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295701</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>My case violated amendments 1 &amp; 4 regarding freedom of speech and violation of due process when two men were caught in their home while they were in the middle of sexual intercourse. They were immediately arrested w/o fair due process. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295701</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Griswold vs Connecticut </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295765</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This case basically talks about amendment 14 . The Supreme Court banned contraceptives in the state of Connecticut , for violating the right of martial privacy </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295765</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Griswold vs. Connecticut </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295800</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The amendment meant said in my case was the fourteenth amendment and my case was about how Connecticut banned the use of another drug and other things furthering contraception.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:12:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295800</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jordan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295906</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this case a few states were sued because they wouldn’t allow a same-sex couple to marry. In this case the Supreme Court decided to allow them to be married because the 14 amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:13:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295906</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My case was United States v. Windsor. It was about if the words “marriage” and “spouse” which means a union between a man and a woman, refer to same-sex marriage. It questioned the 14th amendment which, for an American citizen to protect certain rights of people</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295907</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:13:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295907</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295942</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>My case was about woman needing consent when deciding to get a abortion</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:13:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295942</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Obergefell v. Hodges</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295987</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This case violated the 14th amendment because it didn’t give the U.S. Citizens rights to love each other based upon their genders.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:13:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295987</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States v. Windsor</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295993</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>My case was about unrecognized same-sex marriage. It was dealing the fifth amendment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:13:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334295993</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v.s. Colorado Civil Rights </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334296791</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This case talks about the 1st amendment. The civil rights commission treated the owner of the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop unfairl when they took on his case on refusing to bake a cake to a same-sex couple for his religious beliefs.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:14:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334296791</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Troxel </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334297055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:15:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334297055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Troxel Vs Granville</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334297070</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In summary, this case issue was mainly about making a decision concerning the care, custody, and control of their children based on the Fourteenth amendment. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:15:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334297070</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tommie Vs Grandparents </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334298194</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Using the 14th ammendment in court, Tommie fights to only have her dead’s husband parents visit their grandchildren once a month but they aren’t having it and they turn up.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-22 19:17:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/smcintyre4/lmy4szoahxr1/wish/334298194</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
