https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2 In your group discuss the impact of your assigned court case. Tell  why the case was brought to trial and  what the outcome was for students. 1. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954) 2. PARC (Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972) 3. Board of Education addressed Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley (1982) 4. Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education (1989) 5. Oberti vs. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District (1992) 6. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F. (1999) en-us 2020-09-16 18:14:10 UTC 2021-02-08 02:20:00 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753009539
This case was brought to trial because there was a disabled kid who was in a wheelchair, and his mother asked the school if they could provide care for her child because he's unable to do things for himself. The school said no and the mother of the child took it to court

The outcome of this case was that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was required school boards to provide continuous nursing services to disabled students who would need it in the school day. 



]]> 2020-09-16 19:21:15 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753009539 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753010405 Case was brought to trial because Schools were not required by law to provide sign language interpreters. 

The outcome of the courtcase was a victory because it led to the creation of I.E.P ]]> 2020-09-16 19:21:34 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753010405 schuhrm01 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753011227 Rafael Oberti was a child with down syndrome and his parents wanted him in a regular educational setting, but he needed the necessary support that they weren't giving him which caused the lawsuit. 
Both federal courts ruled that the school wasn't doing enough in the classroom for Rafael. This case established a test for school districts to see if they were in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). ]]> 2020-09-16 19:21:52 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753011227 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753011765 How it started:
-Raphael had down syndrome and wanted to be put into regular classroom setting 
-Some school districts have concerns with students with disabilities being in regular classes
-District wanted him in separate school district

Outcome:
-School district did not do enough time for student to do the student
-Raphael was admitted into regular ed class and made sure that he had necessary skills and services as any other student in his class]]> 2020-09-16 19:22:02 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753011765 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753012856  The case was brought to trial because the student was in a motorcycle accident and was denied nursing (aide) services. 

Outcome- Required public school districts to fund "continuous, one-on-one nursing care for disabled children" despite arguments from the school district concerning the costs of the services." 



]]> 2020-09-16 19:22:24 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753012856 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753013668 - The case was brought to trial because of educational segregation
- It affected special education because civil rights aided with equal education for both groups 
- Children deprived of educational resources 
- The Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional 

]]> 2020-09-16 19:22:41 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753013668 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753016625 -Why? Handicapped children in the United States were receiving inadequate education or none at all. It was highlighted in the case involving Daniel R.R.v.
What was the outcome? It was determined that students with disabilities have a right to be included in both academic and extracurricular programs of general education            ]]> 2020-09-16 19:23:47 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753016625 jollyj01 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753016830 What?- A six year old child, Daniel, who had Down Syndrome, was placed in a half-day special education class with the other half spent in a tradition Pre-Kindergarten program at the request of his parents. 
Why?- In Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education (1989), it was determined that students with disabilities have a right to be included in both academic and extracurricular programs of general education.]]> 2020-09-16 19:23:52 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753016830 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753022701 -It was brought to trial to overturn the Pennsylvania law and secure a quality education for children 
- Nancy Bowman was told she no longer qualified for public school and didn't receive education for the next 12 years
 
-It resulted in a content decree in which the state agreed to provide a free public education for children with mental retardation.]]> 2020-09-16 19:26:01 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753022701 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753024197 This case was brought to trial, because people with disabilities were denied access to attend public schools.  
  The outcome was, Pennsylvania opened up their schools to give opportunity and change the lives of students with disabilities.

]]> 2020-09-16 19:26:34 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753024197 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753024438 GROUP 9
The case was brought because she tried to have a sign language interpreter. IT affected the students attendance and opportunity. The out come use of FM hearing aid sign language instruction for several teachers, and teletype machines in school for students.]]> 2020-09-16 19:26:39 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753024438 https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753057565 The case was brought to trial following public school district in Topeka refusal to enroll the daughter of Oliver Brown at the school closest to their home, forcing her to ride a bus to a segregated black elementary school that is not as close. The outcome of the case was the court declaring the act unconstitutional due to the declaration that segregated public education was unequal.]]> 2020-09-16 19:38:22 UTC https://padlet.com/harrisja4/lma3xoyq311w5ue2/wish/753057565