https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag en-us 2017-10-19 13:58:07 UTC 2019-04-30 14:45:15 UTC hello@padlet.com megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198678507 REALITY IS EXPERIENCED DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY.]]> 2017-10-19 14:16:37 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198678507 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198680652 SOME ASPECTS OF REALITY ARE DELAYED, FOR EXAMPLE, THE SUN. IF WE EXPERIENCE SOME THINGS LATER THAN THEY ARE IN REALITY, THAN THEY CANNOT BE EXPERIENCED IMMEDIATELY, AS IT SAYS IN DIRECT REALISM. THIS ATTACKS THE IMMEDIACY OF DIRECT REALISM.]]> 2017-10-19 14:20:08 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198680652 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683504 IN REALITY, THERE ARE SOMETIMES ILLUSIONS WHERE WE SEE THINGS HOW THEY AREN'T IN REAL LIFE. ILLUSIONS ARE NOT SUBJECTIVELY INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM VERIDICAL PERSEPTIONS, MEANING THAT WHAT WE SEE, COULD ALL BE AN ILLUSION (SCEPTICISM) OR WE EXPERIENCE SENSE DATA, NOT THINGS DIRECTLY. THIS ATTACKS THE NECESSITY OF AN OBJECTIVE REALITY TO DIRECT REALISM AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THINGS THAT AREN'T IN REALITY.]]> 2017-10-19 14:24:50 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683504 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683688 HALLUCINATIONS ARE SOLELY MIND DEPENDENT. IN HALLUCINATIONS, WE DONT PERCEIVE PHYSICAL OBJECTS AT ALL, MEANING WE MUST EXPERIENCE SENSE DATA, NOT THINGS DIRECTLY. THIS ATTACKS THE NECESSITY OF AN OBJECTIVE REAILITY TO DIRECT REALISM AS THE REALITY CAN BE CHANGED OR DISTORTED AND WE CAN EXPERIENCE THINGS THAT AREN'T IN REALITY.]]> 2017-10-19 14:25:07 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683688 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683774 SENSE DATA MEANS THAT THINGS ARE NIOT EXPERIENCED DIRECTLY, HOWEVER, HOW IS A PERSON MEANT TO KNOW WHETHER WHAT EVERYONE PERCEIVES IS THE EXACT SAME THING. THIS ATTACKS THE EXPERIENCE OF REALITY DIRECTLY FROM DIRECT REALISM.(BERTRAND RUSSEL'S TABLE)]]> 2017-10-19 14:25:16 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198683774 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198690560 SENSE DATA IS WHAT AN OBJECT GIVES OUT AND WHAT WE PERCEIVE. THIS GOES AGAINST DIRECT REALISM AS IT ARGUES THAT WE DON'T EXPERIENCE REALITY DIRECTLY. OBJECTS THEMSELVES ARE MIND INDEPENDENT WHERE AS SENSE DATA IS MIND DEPENDENT. ]]> 2017-10-19 14:35:48 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198690560 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198698120 WE EXPERIENCE THINGS INDIRECTLY AND NOT IMMEDIATELY.]]> 2017-10-19 14:47:10 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198698120 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198699331 WE PERCEIVE THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS, ONCE THE CONDITIONS CHANGE, THOUGH OUR PERCEPTION MAY CHANGE, THE OBJECT DOES NOT. WE EXPERIENCE THINGS DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY, IN NORMAL CONDITIONS.]]> 2017-10-19 14:49:13 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198699331 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198702388 OBJECTS ARE MIND INDEPENDENT, PERCEPTION IS MIND DEPENDENT. SHAPES BECOME ANOTHER SHAPE ONLY IN PERCEPTION, WHAT YOU SEE IS DOWN TO YOU SEEING IT. RELATIONAL PROPERTIES ARE PROPERTIES EXPERIENCED IN PERCEPTION MIND DEPENDENTLY, NOT IN OBJECTS 9MIND INDEPENDENTLY0. THEREFORE VARIATIONS ACCOUNT FOR CHANGES IN PERCEPTIONS, NOT VHANGES IN OBJECTS]]> 2017-10-19 14:54:09 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198702388 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198707053 ILLUSIONS
DREAMS
DECEITFUL DEMON
IF WE'VE BEEN TRICKED IN THE PAST, YOU CANNOT KNOW THAT YOU ARE BEING TRICKED NOW. ]]> 2017-10-19 15:01:31 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198707053 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198708275 ILLUSIONS ARE NOT SUBJECTIVELT INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM VERIDAL PERCEPTIONS, AS IF YOU CANNOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE FROM VERIDICAL PERCEPTIONS, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHEN THINGS ARE ACTUAL VERIDICAL PERCEPTIONS AND REAL.]]> 2017-10-19 15:03:27 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198708275 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198709777 YOU CANNOT TELL WHEN YOU ARE NOT DREAMING, YOU CANNOT BE CERTAIN THAT ALL OF PERCEPTION AROUND YOU IS NOT A DREAM]]> 2017-10-19 15:05:55 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/198709777 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/209389515 ALL OF THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST DIECT REALISM (TAMELAG ETC) SUPPORT INDIRECT REALISM AND THE ROLE OF SENSE DATA]]> 2017-11-22 10:18:17 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/209389515 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/209394271
PRIMARY: MIND INDEPENDENT, BELONG TO THE OBJECT(EG MOTION, SOLIDITY & FIGURE, EXTENSION)
SECONDAY:MIND DEPENDENT (EG SOUND, TASTE & COLOUR)
GRAIN OF WHEAT
SUPPORTS SENSE DATA BUT MIND INDEPENDENT OBJECTS]]> 2017-11-22 10:35:21 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/209394271 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211899557 IF WE HAVE BEEN TRICKED IN THE PAST, HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT'S REAL?]]> 2017-11-30 15:31:03 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211899557 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211907225
BERKELEY CAUSES ISSUE WITH THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE QUALITIES. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY QUALITIES ARE INSEPERABLE AS YOU CANNOT HAVE A COLOURLESS OF SHAPELESS OBJECT. THIS MEANS THAT BOTH ARE MIND DEPENDENT. ]]> 2017-11-30 15:43:49 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211907225 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211909568 THERE IS NO OBJECTIVE REALITY, ALL THAT EXISTS, ARE MINDS. OUR MIND AND GOD'S MIND.]]> 2017-11-30 15:47:28 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211909568 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211911123 GOD ISN'T EFFECTIVELY INTERGRATED INTO THE THEORY. IT'S NOT JUSTIFIED. THE EXISTANCE OF GOD IS AN INFERRANCE.
BERKELEY RESPONDS BY APPEALING TO THE ATTRIBUTES OF GOD, AS HE CANNOT TRY TO COMPREHEND A BEING AS COMPLEX AS GOD. THIS IS NOT A VERY VALID ARGUMENT AS THE USE OF GOD ISN'T ADEQUATE TO EXPLAIN A THEORY, THIS POINT IS NOT AS COMPLEX AS HIS OTHERS.]]> 2017-11-30 15:49:34 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211911123 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211914373 TO BE PERCEIVED IS ONE THING, BUT TO EXIST IS ANOTHER. TO BE UNPERCEIVED IS TO CEASE TO EXIST.
BERKELEY RESPONDS THAT GOD IS THE ULTIMATE PERCEIVER. HOWEVER IF GOD WERE TO THINK OF SOMETHING, HE WOULD BE CONCEIVING OF IT INSTEAD OF PERCEIVING IT.]]> 2017-11-30 15:54:04 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211914373 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211915888 ONLY ONE MIND EXISTS. IT'S IDEALISM WITHOUT GOD. OUR OWN EXPERIENCE TELLS US ABOUT REALITY . ONLY PERCEPTIONS IN YOUR MIND EXIST.
BERKELEY RESPONDS BY ACCEPTING THAT HE HAS NO IDEA OF GOD'S MIND. HE CAN ONLY BE SURE OF HIS OWN MIND. THIS SHOWS THE THREAT OF SOLPSISM IS STRONG.]]> 2017-11-30 15:56:08 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211915888 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211918155 NO TWO PEOPLE CAN EVER SEE THE SAME THING. YOU CANNOT GUARENTEE WE ALL SEE THE SAME THING- INTERPERSONAL VARIATION. 
BERKELEY RESPONDS THAT OBJECTS/IDEAS POSSES THE SAME QUALITIES. YOU EXPERIENCE YOUR SENSE DATA, I EXPERIENCE MINE. 
 THIS IS INEEFECTIVE AS A RESPONSE. IT SHOULD HAVE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION OF THIS. WE CAN LOOK AT THE SAME OBJECT BECAUSE THERE IS AN OBJECT. PERCEIVE A COPY OF AN IDEA IN GOD'S MIND, ROLE OF GOD. ]]> 2017-11-30 15:59:35 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211918155 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211920904 WE DON'T SEE REALITY AS IT IS, WE SEE IT AS IT'S PERCEIVED- THE PRODUCT OF ATOMS, NOT ATOMS.THE FACT THAT SCIENCE EXISTS MEANS THAT THERE MUST BE MATTER.
BERKELEY RESPONDS WITH THAT WE SEE BUNDLES OF IDEAS. WE SEE A SENSORY VIEW OF REALITY, NOT SCIENTIFIC. WE USE LANGUAGE TO EXPLAIN BUNDLES OF IDEAS TO LINK EVERYTHINBG. ACCOUNTS OF HOW PERCEPTIONS ARE LINKED. THIS IS AN IVALID RESPONSE AS YOU SHOULD MAKE A MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF LANGUAGE, IT'S HOW WE COMMUNICATE, BOTH NEED TO UNDERSTAND IT.]]> 2017-11-30 16:04:14 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211920904 megan_burroughs1 https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211923558 2017-11-30 16:08:57 UTC https://padlet.com/megan_burroughs1/llh6sz167hag/wish/211923558