https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc Why might learning theory of attachment be seen as reductionist? Why might this theory be considered to be deterministic? To what extent can we generalise this theory to other cultures? Post your ideas to the padlet en-us 2018-01-21 14:06:01 UTC 2018-01-25 10:56:24 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224577742 Reductionist:
Makes relationships all about primary care/survival
Ignores biological differences in children; i.e autism/downs/schizophrenia

Deterministic:
Only have natural instincts at birth
Ignores relationship development whilst in the womb; sounds of voices
Ignores infant's observations on adult behaviour and own decisions/judgements

Generalisable:
Ignores biological differences in children; i.e autism/downs/schizophrenia
Class/cultural divide - Japanese mothers always have their baby with them. Some people have nannies/matron (royal family or busy lifestyle/work), some go to nursery. 
Family dynamic - some children have older siblings, some born first.]]> 2018-01-25 10:35:58 UTC https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224577742 https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224578276 Jess/Niamh/Charlotte 
It reduces complex behaviours of attachment to simple survival needs

Deterministic 
Behaviour is pre-determined, ignores free will.

Generalisation 


]]> 2018-01-25 10:38:10 UTC https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224578276 https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224581414 Arran/Khadija/Teodora
Human behaviour is simplistic in nature. Human behaviour is instinctual. A baby needs food to survive so it's easy to understand why they do things.

Behaviour is predictable due to predetermined factors i.e survival needs.

Human behaviour and survival instincts surpasses different cultures.


]]> 2018-01-25 10:50:37 UTC https://padlet.com/victoria_hindle/ligjaora46oc/wish/224581414