<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment #1 by Kaitlyn Chaisson</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur</link>
      <description>Created by Kaitlyn Chaisson, Olivia Fenwick and Morssal Azimian</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-02-10 23:17:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2020-02-11 04:35:52 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Post #1 : Assignment #1</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443392859</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Content created by Kaitlyn Chaisson, Morssal Azimian and Olivia Fenwick.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-10 23:23:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443392859</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #2 (Red Flag) : Mystical Energy</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443393274</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Kaitlyn Chaisson<br><br><em>Definition: </em>The red flag <strong>Mystical Energy </strong>is backed by 'science' that has no actual background information. It's supposedly scientifically but has no actual evidence. <strong>Mystical Energy </strong>is usually used by psychics and paranormal investigators when connecting with clients.<br><br><em>Connection: </em>Below is a link that shows many red flags, the most prominent being <strong>mystical energy</strong>. This article created by angel fire is all about how <em>you</em> can tap into mystical energy and use it. The article explains three different methods used to tap into the energy around you and use it to your advantage. Critical thinking should be applied when reading through this website, the end of the article talks about creating 'psi balls' and you really need to gather more information on this. You also need to be skeptical when looking through these websites, they often try to sell you their own products to 'help' you connect with the earths '<strong>mystical energy</strong>'.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.angelfire.com/home/stephenb337/mystical/energy.html" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-10 23:24:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443393274</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3 (Red Flag) : All Natural</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443445947</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Kaitlyn Chaisson<br><br><em>Definition: </em>The red flag <strong>All Natural </strong>is the idea that things provided by the earth, work best for the human body. It's believed by many that the '<strong>all natural</strong>' lifestyle is better for your body overall, and to be <strong>all natural </strong>you need to stay away from things such as gmo. Meaning that people who are '<strong>all natural</strong>' usually do not believe in vaccines and look for alternate solutions. <br><br><em>Connection: </em>The following article talks about the dangers of vaccinations and <strong>all natural </strong>alternatives to prevent certain diseases. Some of their alternatives include; breastfeeding; mistake mushrooms; and your diet. Obviously these things will NOT protect someone against the measles, but anti-vaxxers who firmly believe in <strong>all natural</strong> supplements think that these do work. When looking into anything to do with <strong>all natural</strong> you NEED to apply critical thinking, evaluating evidence is key to this. Many people who believe in <strong>all natural </strong>things follow studies that show no real proof and have no actual scientific evidence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.offthegridnews.com/alternative-health/natural-vaccination-alternatives-for-you-and-your-kids/" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 02:13:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443445947</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4 (Red Flag) : Red Herring</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443477431</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Kaitlyn Chaisson<br><br><em>Definition: </em>The red flag <strong>Red Herring </strong>is when someone distracts from the original questions asked by asking their own questions and avoiding the overall topic at hand. U.S. President Donald Trump is known for using the <strong>red herring </strong>tactic in interviews and during speeches.<br><br><em>Connection: </em>In the video below, it shows a compilation of Donald Trump avoiding questions asked to him, by asking his own questions. This is a great example of <strong>red herring</strong> because not once does he answer a question. He decides to shift the conversation to something he's interested in, he avoids a lot important things, like climate change. When looking into the red flag of <strong>red herring</strong> you need to be very skeptical of things because it's very easy to get lost in what people are saying. I think that <strong>red herring </strong>connects to proof by verbosity as well, there's a lot being said and it's easy to get lost.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiAn-l5_wGg" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:02:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443477431</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5 ( Red Flag) : Confusion of Causation with Correlation </title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443481200</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Olivia Fenwick<br><br><em>Definition: </em>Confusion of causation with correlation is the false connecting of two unrelated events or things. This means creating a false connection between two unrelated things with no proof or fact connecting them.<br><br><em>Connection: </em>his article talks about the reasoning behind the anti-vax movement.</div><div>The anti-vaccination movement has skyrocketed, using multiple arguments to “support” their cause. However, the connections that they make to protest vaccinations have been disproven ever since former doctor Andrew Wakefield suggested a link between vaccinations and the development of autism. This was disproven; however, people still use that argument as a reason not to vaccinate their children. It’s been shown that fear of vaccines may be rooted back to when they first came out in the 18<sup>th</sup> century (the first vaccination was created by Edward Jenner in 1796 for smallpox). People used to refer to them as “the devil’s work.”</div><div>This connects to the red flag I have chosen because the connection between autism and vaccinations is a false one, yet people still use it as a reason to not vaccinate their children.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657116/" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:19:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443481200</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #6 (Red Flag) : Confirmation Bias</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443481733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Olivia Fenwick<br><br><em>Defintion: </em>Confirmation bias is only seeing and accepting evidence that supports your favoured side of an argument. An example of this is using only evidence that supports your argument to try and sway others to believe the same as you.<br><br><em>Connection: </em>DISCLAIMER: I know this is a sensitive topic, but I feel it’s important to address the confirmation bias that is shown in the case of abortion, specifically the pro-life argument. I am not here to attack personal belief. I’m simply pointing out the obvious fallacy that is appealed to when many groups or people form their arguments in this debate.  </div><div>When pro-life organizations are arguing that it’s “always better not to abort”, they use examples of women who kept their babies from an unexpected pregnancy and ended up having quite successful and happy lives. However, they conveniently don’t showcase examples where women have had their children taken from them or been deemed unfit mothers or ended up homeless because she couldn’t afford to raise the child. They choose to showcase success stories to make it seem like it will always be easier and happier if you choose not to terminate your pregnancy. In many cases, these organizations paint women who abort as villains.</div><div> My example is from a pro-life organization in Toronto. They choose to post stories of women who regretted their abortions and women who kept their babies to support their arguments. However, there are no posts of women whose lives were improved or sustained by terminating pregnancies. The argument has not taken into account women in abusive relationships, sexual assault victims, teen pregnancies, birth defects that could harm both mother and baby, and the extreme cases like incest.</div><div>In conclusion, many pro-life groups paint a beautiful picture of what it will be like if you choose not to terminate your pregnancy, and don’t address the negative effects because they don’t support their arguments.</div><div>I have attached a pro-life “meme” shared by the owner of the pro-life organization CHOICE42, located in Toronto. This meme depicts Michelle Williams accepting her golden globe. Williams spoke about how her abortion was the reason she was there that day accepting her award. This meme is stating that because Williams had an abortion, she didn’t “win”, but the woman who kept her baby did.</div><div>This is an example of confirmation bias because it influences the viewer to think that the reason Williams didn’t “win” is because she had an abortion, which is what the poster believes and wants the viewer to believe as well.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.facebook.com/SaveTinyHumans/photos/a.2238788729685582/2587697521461366/?type=3&amp;theater" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:22:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443481733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #7 (Reason for Belief) : Unexplained</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443482576</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Morssal Azimian<br><br><em>Definition: </em>Unclear of the situation or something<br><br><em>Connection: </em>One of the things that are unsolved in this article is what is dark matter, and why can’t we see it? </div><div>To summarize it explains what dark matter is, and what is visible and what is not, yet it is still unexplained as to why we cannot see dark matter, but we know the information about it.</div><div>According to the article the observations scientists have been making are that dark matter exists and they can’t figure out why we are unable to see it. And they would like to figure out why.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://futurism.com/2018-unsolved-scientific-mysteries" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:26:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443482576</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #8 (Reason for Belief) : Idealogical Support</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443482946</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By Morssal Azimian<br><br><em>Definition: </em> It is an Adjective that describes political, culture or religious beliefs.<br><br><em>Connection: </em>This article talks about global action and rising noncommunicable disease.</div><div>This connection explains public health values, and how the new constitutionalism may or may not constrain public health legitimacy. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1468018117744153" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:28:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443482946</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #9 (Reason for Belief) : Patternicity</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443483255</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Morssal Azimian<br><br><em>Definition: </em>Paternal origin.<br><br><em>Connection: T</em>his article talks about Shroud man and the naked eye.</div><div>According to the article the most “distinctive characteristics” triggers the unanswered question “<em>What “caused” a front to back linear mirror image of an adult male to be formed on a linen burial cloth?”</em></div><div>There is no science to be able to prove this and give an actual response to this unanswered question. This connects Christ and the purpose he had in the world. By studying to Analyze, and revered. Shroud of Turin is the most studied artifact in the world according to the article.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.christianity.com/wiki/jesus-christ/what-is-the-shroud-of-turin.html" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:29:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443483255</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #10 : Critical Analysis</title>
         <author>kaitlyn_chaisson</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443483558</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By: Olivia Fenwick<br><br><em>Confusion of Correlation with Causation-Vaccinations</em></div><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 1- DEFINE PROBLEM</em></div><div>The problem is as follows: Do vaccinations cause autism?</div><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 2-GATHER INFORMATION</em></div><div>I went to the CDC to find statistics on rise of preventable diseases in the united states. I also researched Andrew Wakefield’s claim that vaccinations cause autism. My evidence is listed below, along with the evaluation.</div><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 3-EVALUATE EVIDENCE</em></div><ul><li>The claim made by Andrew Wakefield that vaccinations can cause autism- proven incorrect and blatantly false, yet it is still used as “evidence” to this day </li><li>There were over 1000 confirmed individual cases pf the measles in the United States in the year 2019 alone. This was the highest case count in the United States since 1992. The majority of patients were not inoculated with the measles vaccine. This information was gathered from the CDC, which is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States: <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html">https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html</a></li></ul><div>Using this evidence, I can conclude that the anti-vax movement established in 1998 has done more harm than good, increasing the spread of preventable diseases for no actual reason.</div><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 4-RECOGNIZE ASSUMPTIONS, EMOTIONS, AND BIASES</em></div><div>I understand that I do have a bias, because I have my vaccinations myself and have not been affected by the things that anti-vaxxers use as their defenses (i.e. Autism or reactions or reduced immune system).  I also need to recognize that some religious backgrounds hold the belief that certain medical procedures such as vaccinations are unorthodox.</div><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 5-SYNTHESIZE EVIDENCE, IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES</em></div><ul><li>It is entirely possible for the confusion to  be made. This is because autism is usually discovered later in life, not at birth. This means that it is more than probable that people discovered their children’s autism AFTER they vaccinated them. However, this does not mean that the two are linked. </li></ul><div><br></div><div><em>STEP 6-SELECT BEST ALTERNATIVE</em></div><div>In conclusion, I have decided to go with the argument that vaccinations do not cause autism. I believe that any link is purely coincidental, as autism is a genetic abnormality that occurs during cell division in utero.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-02-11 04:31:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaitlyn_chaisson/lbe8x58n4yur/wish/443483558</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
