<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My brilliant wall by Jeffrey Potter</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc</link>
      <description>Does your group&#39;s journal article have empirical research? Why or why not?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-08 01:10:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-02-08 16:14:46 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Location of Public Goods and the Calculus of Voting: The Seattle Monorail Referendum </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229633190</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Within this article, the researchers explore whether or not there is a positive correlation between voter turnout and voter proximity apropos of the goods to be reaped from a referendum. This is a scholarly journal article. Bartling, Baybeck, Kinsey, and Peterson (2010) base their own research upon a previously established hypothesis called the cost orientation hypothesis. Alongside this, they base their exploration on a 2002 voter turnout study. <br><br>Bartling, Baybeck, Kinsey, Peterson (2010). Location of Public Goods and the Calculus of Voting: the Seattle Monorail Referendum. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 91(3), 741-761.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-08 15:46:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229633190</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Influence of VAA</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229633478</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This article is an empirical research article. It is due to the fact that it tested it's hypothesis, by using two different groups. The researchers used their own research rather than piggybacking it off another study already published. According to Enyedi, "But VAAs do seem to have the power to consolidate or undermine party preferences." (Enyedi, 2016. p. 1000).<br><br>Enyedi (2016). The Influence of Voting Advice Applications on Preferences, Loyalties, and Turnout: An Experimental Study. Political Studies Association, Vol. 64(4), 1000-1015.&nbsp;<br>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12213</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-08 15:46:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229633478</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Limited Effects of Election Reforms on Efficacy and Engagement </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229637465</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The article is more scholarly research. It examines research to back and conclude on their claim that&nbsp; if change in election rules can make citizens more trusting is overstated. They use other research and analysis of other study's trends to find a correlation. (Bowler and Donovan, 2012) <br><br>Bowler, S., Donovan, T. (2012). The Limited Effects of Election Reforms on Efficacy and Engagement. <em>Australian Journal of Political Science,</em> Vol. 47(1), 55-70. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2011.643161<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-08 15:52:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229637465</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Immigrants&#39; Participation in Voting: Exposure, Resilience, and Transferability</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229640822</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Our article is not an empirical research article. The article uses data that not their own. There are multiple citations in the article.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-08 15:56:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229640822</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Limited Effects of Election Reforms on Efficacy and Engagement</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229651189</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Our article is empirical research. The article uses measured statistics to monitored by a multitude of agencies in a multitude of countries to compare and analyze data from these studies. This data was brought together to determine&nbsp;citizen's participation involving their country's government, and if there had been any change relative to the changes made in their governments.</div><pre>Bowler, S., &amp; Donovan, T. (2012). The Limited Effects of Election Reforms on Efficacy and      Engagement. <em>Australian Journal of Political Science</em>, <em>47</em>(No. 1), 55-70. https://dx.doi.org/      10.1080/10361146.2011.643161 </pre>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-08 16:11:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ref_libr/law787aevsmc/wish/229651189</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
