Lorne & Brunstane EnerPHit - Stage 2 Lessons Learned by Alex Reeves https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7 Review of workflow, processes and links to EnerPHit energy study outputs / next stages en-us 2022-10-03 16:35:46 UTC 2022-10-20 13:58:10 UTC hello@padlet.com No allowances for structural alterations were identified in Lorne feasibility costs alexreeves1 https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327424418 2022-10-05 11:45:35 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327424418 C&B did not include sufficient MEP allowances in feasibility cost plan - eg. did not allow for replacement pipework for heating system, leading to cost increases at Stage 2 alexreeves1 https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327425547 2022-10-05 11:46:38 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327425547 Could PHPP be hosted as a record rather than a WiP file? alexreeves1 https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327426047 2022-10-05 11:47:03 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327426047 Opening up programmed for the end of Stage 2, but where findings were significant CEC then asked for us to update reporting - leading to scope creep. could opening up be programmed earlier? alexreeves1 https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327428489 2022-10-05 11:48:41 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2327428489 Non-combustible internal wall linings https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2333672721 Andrew Thompson at CEC advised insurers have a requirement that all new internal wall linings are non-combustable. CEC's insurers are AIG at present. This has meant tweaks to our Lorne internal wall build up to external walls (However, in relation to non-CEC projects, Andrew pointed out that this requirement could be policy specific and their policy negotiated by a broker, meaning that it does not necessarily mean that all policies through AIG stipulate this requirement)]]> 2022-10-10 14:28:35 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2333672721 Listed building consent https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2333675560 Lorne grade B listed building - this is delegated to Local Authority (not HES) who are more by the book apparently. They are also not willing to engage in any pre-planning discussion

]]> 2022-10-10 14:30:17 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2333675560 Options - https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2348628047 CEC had options 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b. We have reduced this for other studies, yet finding the recent discussion for Brunstane/Liberton is looking at where 100kWh/m2.a is sitting and this is finding that the nuance of a and b are getting discussed. Is having option 2, 3 and 4 enough? 

Also - if NTPSB Standard is adopted - does this put into question how we will approach the options in future?]]> 2022-10-20 08:19:59 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2348628047 Standard assumptions clarecade https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349012258 Is this feasible, given how different all projects are?
Does it make sense to do PHPPs if we don't have opening up info to verify build-ups?
Would it be better to do a qualitative report?

]]> 2022-10-20 13:07:06 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349012258 DesignPH vs Revit clarecade https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349013980 We thought DesignPH would be quicker but actually if Revit model set up correctly (need to amend spec to Multivista or A N Other) this may be better?]]> 2022-10-20 13:08:07 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349013980 Standardize line style in Kinship detail https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349016471 Noticed on the external wall detail we have stored on our Revit family library has a different line style and colour than the project we had been referencing, eg air-tightness line. ]]> 2022-10-20 13:09:26 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349016471 How do we see the studies and options utilised if NTPSB becomes the norm https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349020615 2022-10-20 13:11:41 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349020615 Qualitive vs Quantative Aproach https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349067312 Could we have a set of technical notes which inform qualative feasilbity study]]> 2022-10-20 13:36:02 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349067312 Action: Paragraph - Output https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349069784 Take to Ann Marie? Clare/Ruth to draft list of concerns ]]> 2022-10-20 13:37:10 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349069784 Survey Spec https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349083506 Need to add levels of detail - eg RICS

]]> 2022-10-20 13:44:09 UTC https://padlet.com/lornebrunstane/l86uczab52kuc0e7/wish/2349083506