<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Project 1 Padlet by Anthony Zanetti</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm</link>
      <description>Contemporary Complications in Political Science</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:09:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-09-14 02:24:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Modern ideas and events are overlooked in the teachings of many Political Science Professors. </title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715101763</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:13:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715101763</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Conceptual Problems and Obstacles to Progress in Political Science. </title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715104971</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Keywords: Political culture, social capital, scientific progress, conceptual problems</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0951692803151004" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:16:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715104971</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Empirical vs Conceptual</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715107318</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This articles highlights the difference between empirical and conceptual data. Johnson argues that conceptual data is often over looked within the major of political science, which in turn hinders progress within the field</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:17:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715107318</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The progress of Political Science</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715114555</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Keywords: Rational choices, Empirical Problems, Scientific Progress, Research Traditions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.2307/2131095" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:23:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715114555</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Scientific Progress</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715124986</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this article Dryzek focuses on the traditions within the field of political. He argues that for any progress to take place in science rational choices must be made within competing theories and traditions. Dryzek believes that this type of progress is not possible within the discipline because Empirical Data is the only form of Data acknowledged. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:30:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715124986</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What&#39;s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715134771</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Keywords: Method Driven, Empirical research, Theoretical Assumptions, </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www-jstor-org.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/stable/pdf/3072623.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ae4e4dc93ddf3cd8d7052a471d0b7124b" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:37:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715134771</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Method Driven</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715145118</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this article Shapiro argues that contemporary politcal science is method driven and not problem driven. Shapiro believes method driven research leads to self-serving construction of problems, and the misuse of data in various ways. The main focus of the article is the procedure Shapiro develops for solving problems within the discipline of political science using a problem-driven approach. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:43:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715145118</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>THE NONSENSE AND NON-SCIENCE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE A POLITICALLY INCORRECT VIEW OF ‘POLY-T(R)IC(K)S’</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715150381</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Key Words:&nbsp; Contemporary Political Science, Scientific Questions, Indoctrination. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&amp;context=catalyst" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:47:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715150381</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Failures of Contemporary Political Science.</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715158882</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this article Sly points out where common problems within the discipline occur. He does this by creating a small sketch of what the discipline would look like if it in fact was discipline. Sly believes indoctrination and control play big factors within the field. HE believes we should not just accept these ideologies because they come from experts.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 12:52:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715158882</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>On the necessarily non-empirical nature of political philosophy (or why political philosophy is not a sub-discipline of political science)</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715696902</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Keywords: Methodology, Political Philosophy, Political Scienc, Immunity Thesis. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822775?casa_token=lUZUVIBZX_AAAAAA%3AHtucqCx7ptfpZpJ2hdGmE4c_kfr0gjAt9s4hntVoFdEtr_miRwuBwX1xDAKBiyYzXkMMbL22Q0B_PnY" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 16:54:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715696902</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Politcal Philosophy</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715707724</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Walsh makes a strong claim in this article in which he believes that political philosophy is not a subset of Political Science. He defends his claim by explaining that political theory answers distinct questions and uses different methods than the discipline of Political Science. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-03 17:00:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1715707724</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2nd Popular Source</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1724644395</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Image Oriented</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.enago.com/academy/conceptual-vs-empirical-research-which-is-better/" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-08 12:13:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1724644395</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1st Popular Source</title>
         <author>anthonyzanetti123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1724657289</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1st Person Account</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/09/06/political-scientists-consider-challenges-talking-undergraduates-about-controversial" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-08 12:19:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anthonyzanetti123/l6zc39gq7yboj4rm/wish/1724657289</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
