Genomics Case 2 Question 3C by https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee In looking at the testing report, you note that the first page of the appendix there is a list of “Variants of Unknown Significance.” en-us 2021-09-16 15:14:29 UTC 2021-10-28 12:31:11 UTC hello@padlet.com “Variants of Unknown Significance” haspelr https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1746291866 Would you have put the BRCA2 p.H2074N in the genomic testing report?  Why or why not?  
___________________________________________________
To create a new post, double-click on a blank space or click the plus sign in the lower right-hand corner. You can ignore the  Subject line if you prefer. In the body (under the icons), type your response.  Click "Publish" when you are finished. You can resize your posts by dragging on the edges

RETURN to Main Padlet here.
]]> 2021-09-16 15:14:29 UTC https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1746291866 https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743343 no because the genetic references concur that this mutation is benign and thus has little clinical utility]]> 2021-09-25 20:12:50 UTC https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743343 Yes https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743523 As it takes out confusion of Germaine mutations and risk of breast cancer as she has breast cancer ]]> 2021-09-25 20:13:03 UTC https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743523 No. Too much data...little information...no wisdom. https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743654 2021-09-25 20:13:11 UTC https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743654 https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743685 No, it shouldn’t be included, but there does seem to be other potential actionable alterations such as BRAF G469V and TMB intermediate]]> 2021-09-25 20:13:13 UTC https://padlet.com/haspelr/l4t65w23msoft8ee/wish/1767743685