https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0 en-us 2017-10-30 18:28:34 UTC 2017-10-31 18:38:27 UTC hello@padlet.com zheyuan_liu https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201881701 In this questions, it is asking a answer without the true answer to it.  It ask using book's view that means we need to use the text in the book as evident to support our answer. We can use critical thinking skills such as inference and debate to come up with a preeminent answer.   ]]> 2017-10-30 18:36:57 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201881701 kevin_yang https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201882813 I think the best method for this question is inference. Because there are no right answers can be deducted from the book and there are a lot of different purpose of the portrayal. So the best way to solve is to make make several reasonable guesses and find out the possible analysis about why Steinbeck want to make the portrayal.]]> 2017-10-30 18:39:04 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201882813 zheyuan_liu https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201889682 The question is asking a answer with evident in the book, but did not have direct answer in the book. So we need to use the book to make a inference what role does Slim, Crooks, and Curley play. This is not deduction because everyone analyze the text different throughout different personal feeling, and that means we will have many different answer in different lenses]]> 2017-10-30 18:52:40 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201889682 kevin_yang https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201961317 I think deduction is the most beneficial critical thinking skill for this one. Because for this question, the answer is more likely to be finding descriptive passages and explain each of them individually. Since deduction skill is more suitable for explaining point of views and analyze so it is the most beneficial one for this question. ]]> 2017-10-30 23:19:18 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201961317 kevin_yang https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201962519 For the first question "How can we justify what he does to Lennie?" the most beneficial critical thinking technique we should use is deduction because what he did to Lennie have been told detailedly from the book so what we needs to do is more about analyze and review. For the second question the best tool we can use is inference because this is the part not in the book and we needs to make reasonable guesses according to what he did to Lennie in the earlier part of the book.]]> 2017-10-30 23:27:32 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201962519 zheyuan_liu https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201963068 The first part which is discussing Steinbeck's description of the natural World. We can use deduction in the first part of the question to organize our thought. In the second part of the question it ask about symbolism that express by nature. The question is asking us to go deep into the subtext. The critical thinking skill that is best suited for subtext is inquiry.]]> 2017-10-30 23:30:57 UTC https://padlet.com/kevin_yang/l4472i0u1hx0/wish/201963068