-       Who should be able to have a say in a child’s education.
Who are the main players in the conflict?

-       Parents, teachers, and the government

 In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

-       I think that this decision should be up to the parents, but have some governmental regulation. There should also be some religious exemptions. 
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

-       I think that the parents should be able to put their kids in any type of schooling that they want. Public or private should not matter. I think that if a parent wants to home school there should be some more regulation with that. The parents should have some guidelines to follow on what they need to teach their kids or there should be some sort of certification class they need to take to home school. I think that there should also be religious exemptions, which makes kids stay in school for a certain amount of time. 
Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

-       The parents should have a bigger say in these decisions
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

-       While the should have the final say the parents should have to follow some government rules. Parents should have the freedom to homeschool their kids as long as they can follow regulations with education. I think that kids need an some sort of education to be successful, which can be done in different ways. There are many pros and cons to different schooling options (public, private, home, montessori etc…), so I think that parents should have the final say in what they decide.

 

 

 

 

The major conflict is the fight of who has control over schools. In a much bigger sense, the problem is concerned with who has influence on children.

Who are the main players in the conflict?

The main players in this conflict include the government, the parents, and the teachers. These “main players” affect the children.

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

In my opinion, I feel these decisions and responsibilities are, in a larger sense, up to the teachers and government. In a lesser sense, these decisions should also receive input from parents.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)? I feel that my answer is justified because if done correctly, I think the government could control what is getting taught in a sense that they can prepare children in the country for society by ensuring a well-rounded, diverse education and ensuring that every child has a chance to receive a good education. Teachers should also play a large role in controlling education since they are in the position to teach children what is important. Parents, in a much lesser sense should have an input due to preferences for their children, but not too big of an input in the chance they are shielding their kids from learning about important topics because of selfish reasons.

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

I think that the teachers and government should have a bigger say in these decisions.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

As stated above, I don’t disagree that parents should have a say, however, some parents hinder their children from receiving well-rounded educations including multiple viewpoints and topics. In these cases, I feel it may be due to selfish reasonings. If the parents have unselfish reasoning behind their children learning certain topics, I believe they could have more say, however, parents like to control their children in ways that won’t give their children independence to form their own viewpoints and thoughts, but rather, enforce the parental viewpoints.

The major conflict being described is determining who controls education and why. There have been countless cases and questions when it comes to who gets to decide what children learn and there is different justification for each argument, making it very difficult for their to be a ‘right’ answer. 
Who are the main players in the conflict?
The main players in this conflict seem to be the parents the government. While the issue is centered around the children, they do not have much say at all. There is a constant battle between parents and government to determined what is right for the kids.
In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

I believe whatever you think the purpose of education is determines who you think should make the decisions. No one person or institution should be solely responsible for such large decisions.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
Obviously parents should get a say over the material their children consumes but until what age? And how do you know it isn’t for selfish and sheltered reasons? Giving the government complete control isn’t right either. In my opinion the checks and the battles on the education system keeps it from becoming tyrannical and having absolute power. We should always question.
Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

The government plays the largest part by funding and setting regulatory standards; however, I believe the children (beyond like 6^th/7^th grade) should be able to take ownership of their learning.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

By the time kids are in elementary school and middle school they are taught responsibility, by high school there is emphasis on autonomy, and by college they are completely on their own. Giving the students a say in the material they learn seem to cut out the middleman and provide a stronger basis for what they need. This will also prepare kids to be better advocates for themselves and foster more self-awareness in learning styles and abilities.

 I feel my answer is justified because in the matter of a child's education, the parents who created the child or are taking care of the child should have a say in what their child is learning. And again the child is a citizen in their community and that community should have a say on what they teach the children that will be growing up in it.

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

Parents should have a bigger say in these decisions. I say this because they are the ones who are supposed to guide their children down the correct path in life.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
I feel my answer is justified because again as I said previously, the parents job is to guide their child down the correct path in life. This all starts with a good education or one that the parent believes will help the child have a good life.

 

The idea that kids only belong to their parents/families instead of being part of the larger community/ies

 
Who are the main players in the conflict?

 

The main players in this conflict seem to be the children, parents/families, schools/education system, and the larger community. 

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders? 

I believe that the decisions and responsibilities about a child’s education are mainly up to the parents and the teacher. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

 

I feel my answer is justified in the fact that a parent is responsible for looking out for their children and making sure they are in the best environment possible, including where and how they are receiving their education. It is additionally up to the teachers to provide a well-rounded curriculum and safe space for their students to learn as they are the one directly interacting with students. 

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

 

I think that at the end of the day the parent should have a slightly bigger say in these decisions. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

 

I feel like my answer is justified as parents know their children best and see their reactions to what they are learning at school when they come. If they believe that something is detrimental to their child they should have the opportunity to have an open conversation with the teacher or school in order to better understand the reasoning behind the curriculum and have both sides voices heard. 

The major conflict being described in this reading is a long-standing debate on who in fact should oversee a child’s education. Moreover, as the conflict described, the question of how involved should state and government legislature be in a child’s education.

The main players in this conflict include parents, children, the government, the state legislature, and the teachers. More specifically, main players include individuals such as Melissa Harris-Perry, whose opinion that children more so belong to the community than to their parents is often debated and challenged. Additionally, I would go on to say that the Romeike family, the German family who is known for pulling their kids from public school and into home-school, would also constitute as main players in this conflict. 

In my opinion, the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education are a combination of these stakeholders, in that it is the government’s responsibility to provide quality educational opportunities to all individuals. I believe that it is up to the teacher and the school administrators to determine what should be taught, as they are qualified to do. Educational opportunities need to be accessible to all, which means that the teachers and administrators who are the trained professionals, not the parents, are the ones who are qualified to determine what is taught and how. Our system is currently funded by the government and taxpayers, which has fostered inequity, because the tax base is unequal based on where you live. For example, in Connecticut, places like Greenwich and Cheshire have great schools because the property is worth more than in places such as Hamden. Lastly, I believe parents are responsible for getting their kids to school and for being a partner in their child education by reinforcing what is taught in school. 

I feel that my answer is justified because it is my belief and rules and regulations are imperative to be in a successful learning environment. Additionally, I believe that if parents were the only party in power, they would decide what could be taught and what could not. Furthermore, several policymakers are trying to enforce that, specifically in Florida, and I believe that hinders a child’s learning experience. Overall it is my belief that the combination of these stakeholders and the continuation of providing equal education to all is crucial to give the leaders of the future (the children) an impactful education.

The major conflict from the reading is who has control over the children’s education, parents or the government. Can the government have an opinion on how parents chose to educate their kids?

Who are the main players in the conflict?

The main players in the conflict are the Romaine family, the government, school systems, and religious beliefs. 

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

In my opinion, the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education is up to the parents, government and teachers. Specifically, the government should provide different options of education like public schools, private school, homeschool and be in charge of coming up with the curriculum. The parents have to decide which format of schooling they best see fits for their children. Then the teachers have the responsibility of teaching the curriculum in a way the children can. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

I feel that my answer is justified because parents are responsible to do what is best for their children and in order to do so the government and teachers need to provide families with options to get their children an education. 

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

I think that the government plays a slightly bigger role than the parents only because the government is the start when getting children an education. First, the government gives options for schooling then the parents chose the type of schooling provided by the government then it is up to the teachers to teach the curriculum. If the government does not provide education options then children would not be able to get the education they deserve. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

I feel that my answer is justified because the government should want to make sure children are learning and are going to be able to be successful in the future. In order for the children to get what they deserve everyone involved in providing the education needs to do their jobs.

The major conflict in this reading is who has the rights and responsibilities of children and how they are educated. Do children belong to their families or do they belong to the larger communities and if either have control in choosing how they are educated. 

 

Who are the main players in the conflict?

The main players in this conflict are the government, community, and families. People in the community, government, and families have challenged the ideas which have raised a debate for decades regarding who is responsible for children’s education. 

 

 

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

 

In my opinion, I believe that parents have the right to make decisions about their children’s education. However, I do believe that the community, teachers, and government have the right to construct the curriculum to allow for unbiased information. 

 

 

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

I believe that the parents should have a bigger say in these decisions which I believe they do. Teachers should have a bigger say than the government/community.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

The parents gave life to their children, and they should be able to decide whether or not they want their child to attend private school or public school, or homeschool. Families also value morals and traditions, so if the education system goes against those morals/traditions it is acceptable for a parent to remove their child from the situation. At the end of the day, parents raise their children how they choose to and should have the freedom to do so. When it comes to the curriculum, the teacher’s perspective is important because not only are they educating but they need to be passionate/care about what they are teaching. The community and government can collectively create a curriculum that is unbiased and approved by the teacher.

  The major conflict being described is that the political community shapes children as they grow up just as much as families do. The family in question does not agree with the German school system and goes to great lengths to homeschool, even though it is illegal in Germany.  
-Who are the main players in the conflict? 

 The main people in this conflict is the parents and the government. The children are having no opinions are not being considered in this situation. 
-In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders? 

 Personally, I think these responsibilities should fall on a combination of the parent and government. Including the child's opinions.  
-Why (do you feel your answer is justified)? 

 I agree that parents should have some say in what type of education their child is receiving, but that the government should be regulating these decisions to make sure it is a reasonable choice. Personally, I do not agree with homeschooling because growing children need to interact and associate with others their age and learn in a reliable environment. But I also think the child should have an opinion on what kind of schooling they want to be a part of depending on the circumstances. 
-Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions? 

 I think the government should have the upper hand in these decisions.  
-Why (do you feel your answer is justified)? 

 Someone needs to be responsible and make sure these children are getting a quality education despite some parents' beliefs. I understand having religious or personal beliefs but when it comes to a child's education, there should be some sort of regulation to make sure the child is getting quality care. 

The major conflict explained throughout this reading was about the type of education children should and shouldn’t obtain. However, this revolves around the justification of the student’s parents' input and the states based on the curriculum being taught.                            Who are the main players in the conflict?

The main players in this conflict would be the parents/community, the government, the teachers, and possibly the board of education. The reason those are the main “players” in my opinion is that they all play a significant role in educating the children/students.              In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

In my opinion, the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education should be up to the parents, teachers, and government because overall they have a lot of power to benefit the child’s success in their educational journey.            Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

Personally, I feel my answer is justified because parents want their children to receive the education they deserve, and make sure the learning environment they’re in is safe and comfortable for their children, also they’re responsible for caring for and providing for their kids as well. The teachers have a big part in this as well because they’re the ones who are doing the educating part of this. They obviously want to provide the correct curriculum and help to benefit their student’s education. Lastly, the government should be open to comprising the schools/teachers to see what type of curriculum is appropriate for that grade level to teach it and educate them with the right information too.      Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

Overall, the state and parents/community seemed to have a very fair and open-minded viewpoint so honestly, they should have a bigger say in these decisions. For the sake of the state’s position, they had been even-handed with their justification when making decisions for this event. The reason being the lessons being taught and information being obtained by their children should be something they’re aware of and agree to their kid's learning.                          Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

I feel like my answer is justifiable in the sense of knowing parents just want the best for their children and know they’re enjoying the process of being educated their reaction by telling their parents what they learned, gives the parents a sense their kids are on a good path of success and they can continue to guide them along the way gives the parents that positive feeling of happiness and relief. With, the parents/community, teachers, and state will all agree or disagree on their opinions on this topic, and it can be justified in a variety of ways. 

 The major conflict being described in this reading is whether the state should have control over children and their education, or if those matters should be up to the parents of the children. There are also other aspects considered, such as if the community, taxpayers, or the church should have any influence on a child's education and what that may look like.
Who are the main players in the conflict?

 The main players in the conflict are the government, parents, and the children of the parents. Other possible contenders would be leaders of the community or church.
In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?
I think that the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education is a combination of the mentioned stakeholders. However, I think that the parents of the children ultimately have power over how their own children are being educated. I see nothing wrong with homeschooling as long as the children have proper social integration and are learning all of the major things they normally would in school, (ie math, science, language, etc). However, just keeping children home and not properly teaching them material and skills that would aid them in becoming a functioning member of society should not be an option.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

 I think that families have their reasonings for wanting to keep their children at home and that should be up to them. Obviously, there are limitations to this as I believe children need to be integrated socially and have interactions with other children in order to succeed in society. However, as long as these homeschooled children are hitting all the benchmarks that typical school children are, there is not anything wrong with wanting to upkeep certain values and teachings that may be lost throughout public schooling. I think another alternative to homeschooling though would be private schooling, either non-religious or religious, that way families know what their children are being taught. Some religions have very strict rules regarding how children are brought up, and I do not think that the government should be able to take that away from them.
Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

 I think that parents should have the bigger say in how their children are educated. However, I think that the government should have a say in regards to curriculum and benchmarks that are set for kids as they get older.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

 The parents of these children are responsible for shaping them into adults, and if they do not agree with the language being used at school or what is being taught, then they have the right to remove their children from the situation or send them to a private school. However, children need to have learned different skills by the time they reach certain ages, such as spelling, writing, math skills, language, etc.

The major conflict in this reading is who has primary responsibility and authority of children.

Who are the main players in the conflict?

Parents, children, the authority/political community (government), public schools, educators, the state.

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

The decisions and responsibilities of a child's education are up to the parents first and then the government to regulate that education.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

At the end of the day, a parent knows their child best and needs to do what is best for them. If public schools aren’t a good fit for a student and their education can’t be optimized, then they should be given another option. However, education is extremely important, so I think that it is important that the government monitors and regulates it in some way. The government shouldn’t be able to pick what each individual child does, but it should regulate the education system.

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

Parents. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
Parents know their children better than any governmental authority so they should have a bigger say. 

 -The major conflict is the debate between who is primary responsible for children and decision-making authority over the. Specifically, the conflict is around the involvement in the children’s education.
Who are the main players in the conflict?
The main players in this conflict would be: the children, parents , family , the government, and those who work in education.
In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?
 In my opinion, the decisions of a child’s education should be from all these groups.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
As much as I would like to say that the parents should have their way for their children, parents often can be bias in their decisions. Therefore, the government, teachers and community, can all come together to create decisions for children’s education that will benefits all children equally.
Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?
 I feel that the teachers should have the biggest say in these decisions. Teachers have first-hand experience dealing with children, therefore, they would have more knowledge on what is beneficial or not.
Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
 Teachers have first hand experience dealing with children, therefore, they would have more knowledge on what is beneficial or not. They also are the ones that would be playing out and be affected with any decisions made . 

-The major conflict being described is who gets to rightfully make decisions for children. Because they are too young to take care of themselves, who controls their education and everything else they do in their young life.

Who are the main players in the conflict?

-The main characters in the conflict appear to be the children's parents, the education system, and the community. The children do not appear to have much or any say in their education, but rather, the decisions are being made for them.

In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

-I believe the decisions and responsibilities of a child's education are mostly up to their parent or guardian because they are the child's primary caregiver. However, how the child gets educated and how they are taught is up to the teacher and education system. I think those are the only two factors that have authority over a child's education.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

-A child's parent or guardian is their primary caregiver. They give them shelter, provide food and water, and love them unconditionally. They have almost 100 percent control over the child and what goes on in that child's life. However, a teacher is the one who plans out the lessons, assigns the work, and grades the students, so they have control over what the child is learning, when they learn it, and how they learn it.

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

-I think the parents should have the most control over these decisions. But I also feel that once a child hits a certain age, maybe around 6th or 7th grade, they should be able to partake in these decisions as well.

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?
-Parents have the most responsibility over their children at all times. They should be able to find the perfect school to send their child to and feel comfortable with their learning environment so they know their child is safe and learning. Once a child reaches 6th or 7th grade, that is when they typically will start middle school. I think by this age a child should be able to be apart of the decision on where they should go to school. A child should feel comfortable in their learning environment and feel safe at all times. They should also feel comfortable speaking out if they do not feel this way by including them in conversations and decision-making situations. It will help them feel heard and that they have someone they can turn to and trust if they do not feel they are getting the education they need. 

The major conflict being described is in determining who will have control over children’s educations.

Who are the main players in the conflict?  
The main players in this conflict are the children’s parents, teachers, and the government. 
      
In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/tax payers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?  
In my opinion, I believe that the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education are in the hands of all stakeholders (parents, teachers, community, government, church).  

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)? 

I feel justified in saying that a child’s education is up to this combination of stakeholders because they can distribute responsibility and gain clarity of what is best for the child because of the diversity of standpoints. 

Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

I believe that the government plays the biggest part in making these decisions. 

Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

I feel that my answer is justified because the government does get to determine how the funds are allocated, which districts will have different schooling options, etc. – therefore, playing a big part. 

 

 

 

          

The major conflict described in the reading is whether or not the political community is responsible for guiding and caring for children. The text also argues that children belong primarily to the political community rather than to their parents. 

The main players in the conflict are the government and the parents since these are the parties who care for and protect the nation’s children. The debate, however, discusses who should have more power or the final say in decisions regarding a child’s wellbeing. While both parties have significant say in the matter, I would say that a parent should have overarching responsibility over their child. 

From reading the text, I would say that the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education is up to the parents because they may want to raise their child according to their own beliefs and morals. While this is true, I think that children should have the opportunity to be exposed to public education and receive education that is up to the government’s standards so that they can successfully enter society once they reach adulthood. 

I feel my answer is justified because of situations where a parent may not agree with the teachings of public education. For example, a family may adhere to a religion or way of life that does not align with lessons outlined in a school’s curriculum. In situations when supplementing a child’s education with lessons taught at home does not harm the child or impede on their education, I think a parent has the right to care for their child in the way they believe is best. 

I would say that parents play a larger part and should have a bigger say in these decisions. On the other hand, I believe that the government is responsible for providing resources to enable the successful development of a child’s education and wellbeing. Since a parent knows their child better and has a moral responsibility to care, a parent should be held more responsible for caring for their child.

After reading the text, I would say my answer is justified because parents have a moral obligation to guide and care for their children. While the government can supplement a parent’s responsibilities with resources such as public education to enable the child’s positive development, it is ultimately the parent’s responsibility to care for their children as guardians. 

The major conflict being discussed is whether parents have the right to make decisions about their children’s education, or whether it is up to the state authorities. This conflict included children being sent to school and their parents noticing their health declining in different ways, in addition to foul language in curriculum, as well as religious values being taught against their personal religion. However, the state authorities are still forcing those children to attend school against their parent’s wishes.

2. Who are the main players in the conflict?  
The main players in the conflict are the parents of the children because they initially went against what the state authorities wanted. The state authorities are also main players in the conflict, due to their rules and laws. However, the three children are the ones who suffer the most due to inadequate education.  

3. In your opinion, Are the decisions and responsibilities of a child’s education up to the parent, the teacher, the community/taxpayers, the government, the church, or a combination of all of these stakeholders?

In my opinion, a child’s education should be in the responsibility of the parent and the best interest of the child, depending on what they need for their educational struggles or values. Additionally, when the child becomes an acceptable age, I think they should have at least a say or opinion towards their parents whether the school they are attending is fit for them. 

4. Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

I think my answer is justified because the student will be the one suffering in the end if they are not happy with their education or school in general. Additionally, when students need more help, it is important for them to have that resource, which you cannot always have in a public school. 

5. Who plays a bigger part or should have a bigger say in these decisions?

School is important for all kids to attend; therefore, the parent should ultimately have the say because children could lie about school and want to homeschool and have this be less beneficial for them. Parents should also have the bigger say because it is their child that they are deciding to send to school, therefore, it is important for the parent to choose a school fit for their child. 

6. Why (do you feel your answer is justified)?

 

My answer is justified because state authorities did not have all these children that are being sent to school, therefore it is not their decision whether they should be in school or not. Additionally, parents generally know their child better than anyone else, so they would make the decision in their child’s best interest for school, which will benefit them later in life.