<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Limerick Discussion #2 by Daniel Teater</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/dteater/kzhzc7wf8l6c</link>
      <description>Limerick suggests that a better way to conceive of Western history is through conflict.  How does conflict tell the story of the American West?  Do you think Limerick&#39;s ideas are superior to Turner&#39;s?  Explain.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-02-12 16:52:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-08 01:20:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Dab on Em´</title>
         <author>cbru1144</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dteater/kzhzc7wf8l6c/wish/330980428</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>She shows that American development in Western history occurred in response to conflicts that took place in the West between different people groups. These conflicts included those between the white American settlers and the indigenous Indians living in the West along with other race conflicts between blacks, hispanics, and others. Limericks ideas not superior to Tuners ideas to a certain extend in the sense that some parts of Turner's Thesis is true while Limericks ideas correct the fallacies found in Turner's thesis.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-13 18:53:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dteater/kzhzc7wf8l6c/wish/330980428</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
