Civil Law by Ms. Baig

559575 — 2017-12-04 14:48:33 UTC

Sections of law relating to interactions between people or people and orginizations

Tort = wrong that is negligent
Family: pretty obvious here
Contract: includes purchases and non obvious contracts
Labour: pretty obvious
Property: again, read the name

Stephen

2017-12-04 14:49:40 UTC

2017-12-04 14:49:44 UTC

Law _relating to interactions between ~~people~~ or between organizations and ^people.

http://www.findmyhairline.com/miller

2017-12-04 14:49:46 UTC

A section of law that covers disputes between private citizens or organizations

2017-12-04 14:49:59 UTC

Civil law

878952 — 2017-12-04 14:50:00 UTC

Civil law is the branch of law regarding people, businesses and organizations.

Manveer

666874 — 2017-12-04 14:50:02 UTC

Law dealing with

2017-12-04 14:50:04 UTC

Civil law is laws regarding interactions between people and their belongings. Distruction of property that can be dealt with civilly between two different parties.

Civil Law:

2017-12-04 14:50:27 UTC

Is legal system concerning people between communites,military or religious affairs

565931 — 2017-12-04 14:50:34 UTC

2017-12-04 14:50:40 UTC

Civil law is the branch of law dealiing with private individuals suing for damages without criminal charges being laid.

Aliyan

2017-12-04 14:50:52 UTC

Civil law is the branch of law dealing with citizens and individuals

Laws that have to do with people and their not-so-smart Illegal decisions.

2017-12-04 14:51:11 UTC

2017-12-04 14:51:13 UTC

when u follow the law civilly

Manveer

666874 — 2017-12-04 14:51:29 UTC

Law dealing with people and organizations

Civil law

anthonydbaa23 — 2017-12-04 14:51:36 UTC

Branch of law dealing with dispute resolution between individuals and/or private NGOs

565931 — 2017-12-04 14:52:08 UTC

Set of laws that regulate a relationship between people and organizations

Civil law

2017-12-04 14:52:11 UTC

Legal law regarding law with military, religious affairs and communit

2017-12-04 14:52:53 UTC

The law is inherently fascist. It regulates voluntary activitity with force

Mustafaa

2017-12-04 14:53:18 UTC

law dealing with businesses and people

Stephen

2017-12-04 14:53:50 UTC

Civil law are set of laws that involve social interests and their organizations.

Reply since there is no comment option

559575 — 2017-12-04 15:21:34 UTC

"The law is inherently fascist. It regulates voluntary activitity with force "

Double check the definition of fascist man. It requires more then just that

<------------

FACTS

2017-12-04 15:23:29 UTC

- 3 year old (Lorrie Tsaoussis) was struck by a car
- Lorrie was hospitalized for 3 days (injuries not permanent said doctor at the time)
- Carol Matcalf (mom) sued Baetz on Lorrie's behalf
- They settled based on doctor's opinion and was deemed resolved
- Lorrie didn't fully recover and continued to have medical problems stemming from the accident
- Tried to sue again (bringing forward another action)
- Baetz appealed, original judgement stood

2017-12-04 15:25:48 UTC

Facts:
3 year old lorrie was struck by a car driven by Juanita. Lorrie was hospitalized for 3 days. Lorries mom, carol sued Juanita. Negotiations between lorries lawyer and the the defendant ensure the amount was based on information from lorries doctor. Lorrie did not fully recover. She continued to have medical problems. Lorries mother sued Jaunita again for neglegance.

Issues:
The defence argued that the claim was already settled in 1992. Lorrie did not fully recover and her health care cost 2.2 million dollars. The lawyer for Lorrie applied to set aside the earlier judgment due to Lorrie not recovering.

Decision:
The application was granted. Lorrie did not get power to sue again. Lorrie will not get more money to help her pay for her continuous health care.

Opinion:
It is not fair that Lorrie cannot sue for more money to help pay for her life threatening inguries caused by Juanita. Lorries doctor did not make a proper judgement during the first court claim.

anthonydbaa23 — 2017-12-04 15:27:26 UTC

Issues

2017-12-04 15:27:42 UTC

Can a previous settlement be set aside if circumstances change (if it turns out to have been an under-compensation)?

Quick summary

559575 — 2017-12-04 15:27:45 UTC

Girl hit by car
Sued
Settled based on injuries non-permanent
injuries did not go away
tried to re-sue

Issues: Can you overturn the decision based on new info?

Fido

2017-12-04 15:28:36 UTC

Facts:
-3 year old Lorrie was struck by a car
-she was hospitalized for 3 days
-Lorries mother sued Baetz on Lorries behaf
-agreement made that Mrs Metcalf agreed with the medical testimony and accepted the settlement on Lorries behalf
-Lorrie did not fully recover

Issues

2017-12-04 15:29:16 UTC

Should a civil settlement be overturned if the plaintiff was unfairly compensated?

Decision

2017-12-04 15:30:36 UTC

The decision was that original case should stand.

Opinion

anthonydbaa23 — 2017-12-04 15:30:46 UTC

-Padlet is hard to use
-Similar to principle of double jeopardy?
-Decision should be proportional to change in circumstances and the existence of a pressing objective to set aside a previous settlement
-Padlet is still hard to use

Opinion

2017-12-04 15:30:55 UTC

Lorrie's actions seem justified to me if her daughter's conditions were reasonably deserving of further compensation (if the degree of severity of the developmental/medical problems was high enough).

The decision that past decisions cannot be brought up again in court goes against my idea of setting precedent, especially if the past actions are relevant enough.

Issues

2017-12-04 15:40:45 UTC