https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb Made with joy en-us 2021-05-24 15:24:24 UTC 2024-12-11 00:48:44 UTC hello@padlet.com kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554107440 2021-05-24 15:24:59 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554107440 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554115121 A: It depends on the prompt. If the question naturally invites personal experience, use one relevant example. A question that invites personal experience is one that involves a general topic, not a specific proposal.]]> 2021-05-24 15:26:44 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554115121 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554342296 A: Use the provided background information. Chances are the College Board has provided a description, definition, context, or an essential quote to grasp onto. From there, you MAY need to provide your own definition or position. Or you may be asked to challenge, defend, or qualify a provided statement. So, at this point, the provided blurb will have served you well. Use cause and effect and inductive/deductive reasoning to argue your way logically and with common sense.]]> 2021-05-24 16:19:09 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554342296 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554365634 A: Specific but concise enough to have time to develop your argument with multiple pieces of evidence. ]]> 2021-05-24 16:24:40 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554365634 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554371469 A: You should organize more around claims.  For example, the GMO prompt invites you to consider environmental factors. There are multiple sources that touch upon that line of reasoning. ]]> 2021-05-24 16:26:06 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554371469 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554377029 2021-05-24 16:27:20 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554377029 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554382730 2021-05-24 16:28:38 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554382730 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554384010 A: Since you are making an analytical claim, you aren't arguing for a position or whether or not the speaker/writer is a good writer. The College Board will provide you with a quality piece of writing. This means, restate your thesis and find time to appreciate the speaker/author's quality of writing. You may also end with some commentary on how influential the text was for that rhetorical situation and a current context. ]]> 2021-05-24 16:28:57 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554384010 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554397656 2021-05-24 16:32:11 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554397656 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554398926 A: Yes, that can demonstrate that you have a keen understanding of the rhetorical situation and can be one way for you to earn the sophistication point. Just make sure you are also using sufficient evidence from 3 sources and the text on the synthesis FRQ and rhetorical analysis FRQ, respectively.]]> 2021-05-24 16:32:30 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554398926 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554423134 A: No, in fact you have both as OPTIONS. Paraphrasing still requires you to use a parenthetical citation, or, at the very least, an intro phrase that attributes the source (e.g. Source A confirms this theory by...)]]> 2021-05-24 16:37:50 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554423134 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554437206 A: Yes, so long as you do not regurgitate the information verbatim. Show off your deeper understanding. Of course you can't help but use keyterms.]]> 2021-05-24 16:41:09 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554437206 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554444418 A: It's better to use the specific examples that fall under each category. Remember that each of the appeals has a certain effect on the audience. What is that effect? Do not organize a response around a thesis statement that says the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos to convey their argument.]]> 2021-05-24 16:42:51 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554444418 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554454439 A: Let your mind be led by the soundbites that are already quoted. Those are some built in great quotes.]]> 2021-05-24 16:45:13 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554454439 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554630240 A: it's not a skill that the College Board assesses. it does not appear on the rubric. It's a good practice and makes it more student professional.]]> 2021-05-24 17:22:32 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554630240 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554636438 A: This is the only FRQ where personal anecdotes do not have any place in your response. Do not use first person pronouns.]]> 2021-05-24 17:24:04 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554636438 kelly_carlin https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554836245 A: Yes, you can acknowledge there are other arguments in the intro.  Just make sure you take a position instead of just pointing out that some people say this, some people say that.  What about what YOU say?  If you make a qualifying thesis statement, the reader EXPECTS you to use counterclaim at some point in the development of your argument. ]]> 2021-05-24 18:12:21 UTC https://padlet.com/kelly_carlin/kxlyruwbcsyyyxcb/wish/1554836245