Similarly, Martins (2024). looks at how unemployment and inflation lead to poverty in Nigeria. From a utilitarian standpoint, economic policies and corporate practices should strive to stabilise the economy and alleviate poverty, ensuring that the maximum number of people have access to basic commodities and services. This method contributes to SDG 1 by promoting overall well-being and helping to bring people out of poverty (Martins, 2024).

Utilitarianism also emphasises the necessity of eliminating gender discrimination, as noted by Georgieva et al. (2022), who state that women earn less than men worldwide, contributing to continuing economic inequality. Businesses may assist to reduce poverty and improve public wellbeing by encouraging equal pay and expanding economic possibilities for women, which aligns with the utilitarian objective of maximising pleasure (Georgieva et al., 2022).

Furthermore, the notion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), as explored by Smith (2023), may be seen from a utilitarian perspective. Businesses that include CSR into their core operations contribute to reducing poverty by offering long-term economic possibilities, such as job creation and education programmes for marginalised groups. This utilitarian approach assures that corporate operations benefit the greater good, which aligns with SDG 1 objectives (Smith, 2023).

A well-known example of this is utilitarianism, which suggests that the best action is the one that brings the most happiness or benefit to the most people. Essentially, teleological ethics is focused on the end results of actions, rather than the actions themselves or the intentions behind them. In short, teleology is an ethical perspective that evaluates the morality of actions based on their outcomes, with the goal of achieving the most positive results.

SDG 1 Relationship:

Teleology, which evaluates actions based on their results, relates to SDG 1: No Poverty by focusing on how well poverty reduction efforts achieve their goals. From this perspective, actions that effectively reduce poverty and improve people's lives are seen as morally right. Both teleology and SDG 1 emphasize the importance of achieving positive outcomes, like ending poverty and boosting overall well-being.

The high female unemployment rate can still be seen in most sub-Saharan African countries. Although gender equality has been promoted in the global market to social and economic progress, the unemployment numbers in the African continent are still persistent due to more gender exclusion and high poverty levels. When the household incomes are low, women are forced to work in households or at the family farm. Furthermore, when women are excluded from certain job industries, it can contribute towards female exclusion in the formal economic sector (Asongu, 2024).

The findings have shown that female ownership of bank accounts only contributes to reducing female unemployment if complementary policies are considered. Educational policies like financial literacy training that are more tailored to the employer’s needs in the job market can improve female employability. The policies should increase employment opportunities for the female gender which could reduce female employment. It is also important to improve technology in banking such as mobile money to assist in reducing inequality (Asongu, 2024).

The findings of this paper are directly connected to UN SDG 1, which seeks to end poverty. By highlighting the unethical pay practices, this article shows how such exploitations inhibit workers from meeting basic needs, therefore dragging them deeper into poverty. This article calls for businesses to stop these unethical practices, and contribute to the global initiative to eradicate poverty (Arsalan, 2020). 

The study delves into the complex relationship between poverty reduction, social inclusion, and sustainable development. While economic growth can help reduce poverty, it often comes at the cost of environmental damage. The research argues that poverty reduction and social inclusion are not just important on their own but are essential and interconnected goals for sustainable development. This is especially true in developing countries like Nigeria, where poverty often leads to environmental harm.

By analyzing data "from 1970 to 2019, the study seeks to fill a gap in the existing research by exploring how these factors interact and impact sustainable development in Nigeria" (Abdulkareem, 2023).

This study is closely aligned with UN Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1), which aims to "end poverty in all its forms everywhere." By examining the persistent issue of poverty in Nigeria, where a significant portion of the population faces multidimensional and absolute poverty, the research directly addresses the core objective of SDG 1.

The study highlights how poverty, coupled with social exclusion, especially among vulnerable groups like women, ethnic minorities, and people with disabilities, creates significant barriers to achieving sustainable development. This is particularly relevant to SDG 1's focus on ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their circumstances, have access to basic resources and opportunities to improve their well-being.

Smith (2023) also emphasises the need of integrating CSR activities with business objectives in order to generate value for both society and the enterprise. Businesses may improve their brand, build consumer loyalty, and enter new markets while contributing to social good. However, the piece warns against "CSR-washing," in which firms engage in CSR initiatives only for public relations objectives rather than creating a meaningful effect. To avoid this, Smith contends that firms must work with stakeholders, such as local communities and governments, to develop successful and sustainable CSR programmes.The article concludes that, while CSR alone cannot address global poverty, it is an important component of wider efforts to accomplish the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 1: No Poverty (Smith, 2023).

The Community Engagement Officer’s role is to plan, organise, and implement centre engagement activities for Headspace Adelaide as a part of a multidisciplinary mental health team. They will also support the services through community engagement and participation activities, develop resources concerning mental health literacy, and provide education, service information and present relevant mental health topics to relevant community organisations. To be successful in this role, the applicant must have prior experience in the planning and delivery of community engagement and youth participation strategies and relevant tertiary qualifications (Seek, 2024).

This role helps vulnerable groups like young people to get access to basic services such as mental health and wellbeing support. Often mental illness becomes the biggest barrier to employment equality, leading people to financial risk (Lettieri et al., 2020).

Manager Community Services has the ability to focus on developing plans to overcome social and ethical issues in the community. One of them is to alleviate poverty by improving community well-being through various services, programs, and information which are inclusive and accessible to everyone, such as educational services. This educational training is important for the community to be more employable (Akhurst & Msomi, 2022).

The role assists in ensuring the availability of environmental resources by focusing on sustainable development through science and technology that can improve the environment and the Earth's quality. Singh and Kumar (2022) found that science and technological progress were positively correlated with social-economic development, sustainable development, and sustainable development. They further suggested that global economies should implement integrated policies in the social, economic, science & technology, and environmental sectors to achieve sustainable development (Singh & Kumar, 2022).

A case manager position for AAFRO provides opportunities to support and work towards no poverty goals, specifically target 1.4 (United Nations, n.d.). The position plays a significant role in ensuring equal access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property, financial services, and basic services by working collaboratively with partnership organisations and entities to make a positive impact and assist with conducting needs analysis, end of program surveys, focus groups, and end of program meetings to align with AAFRO’s continuous improvement cycle (Seek, 2024).

For example, Arsalan (2020) investigates labour exploitation in Pakistan's garment industry, where unethical behaviours such as low salaries and bad working conditions are common. Businesses have a deontological obligation to treat employees with respect and protect their rights, no matter what the cost is. Addressing these challenges immediately contributes to SDG 1 by improving the livelihoods of exploited workers and enabling them to escape poverty. This duty-based approach emphasises that ethical behaviours are not discretionary but necessary, emphasising the notion that firms must adhere to particular principles of fairness and justice (Arsalan, 2020).

Deontology also supports the ethical need to give equal chances to all people, as addressed in Asongu's (2024) study of female unemployment. Businesses and governments have a moral obligation to ensure women's access to financial resources and education. This is consistent with the deontological notion that activities should be directed by moral responsibilities rather than consequences, helping to the attainment of SDG 1 (Asongu, 2024).

Furthermore, Scheweiger's (2019) piece on children's vulnerability to poverty emphasises the moral need to protect society's most vulnerable members. Businesses and governments possesses a moral duty to guarantee that children have access to basic necessities like food, education, and healthcare. Fulfilling these responsibilities is critical for meeting the needs of the most vulnerable and advancing SDG 1, which seeks to eradicate poverty in all forms (Scheweiger, 2019).

Finally, Smith's discussion on CSR in 2023 may be read by a deontological perspective. Businesses have an ethical obligation to contribute to the well-being of society, not for profit, but because it is the right thing to do. From a deontological viewpoint, CSR should be about fulfilling ethical commitments to society, hence reducing poverty and promoting SDG 1 (Smith, 2023).

Ethical theories like utilitarianism, deontology, and teleology offer frameworks to address these challenges. Utilitarianism's focus on the greatest good aligns with SDG 1's goal, while teleology emphasizes the moral duty of businesses and governments to promote economic growth and social well-being (Shaw et al., 2020). To accord with the UN's goal for a more just and equitable world, this presentation calls for a comprehensive approach to poverty eradication that integrates ethical considerations, effective policies, and collaborative efforts by businesses.