<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The rationale for the duty to give reasons  by Stephen Carruthers</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56</link>
      <description>Why impose a duty to give reasons?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-11-23 16:54:37 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-03-30 13:59:42 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Instrumental reasons</title>
         <author>stephencarruthers</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119958229</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. provides legitimacy of decision in eyes of affected individual<br>2. Enhance confidence in justice system<br>3. Improves &nbsp; decision-making process<br>4. Improves rationality of decisions&nbsp;<br>5. Facilitates review process<br>6. Enables constitutional review of statutory decision-making&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-29 18:20:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119958229</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Non-instrumental reasons</title>
         <author>stephencarruthers</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119963979</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Shows respect for dignity of person affected by decision<br>2. Promotes rule of law and fairness<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-29 18:23:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119963979</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Relationship of duty to give reasons and duty to act fairly </title>
         <author>stephencarruthers</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119983046</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. DTGR context specific&nbsp;<br>2. Article 40.3.1 Constitution - fair procedures<br>“it seems … axiomatic that the rule of law requires all decision makers to act fairly and rationally, meaning that they must not make decisions without reasons” Fennelly J. in Mallak. <br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-29 18:33:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2119983046</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rights based rationale vs misuse of power </title>
         <author>stephencarruthers</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2120043776</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Certainly, the rule of law/fairness rationale, in the sense that it promotes high standards in public decision-making, seems to be viewed in England and Wales as the most desirable primary rationale.<sup> </sup>The argument in favour of a broader rationale is perhaps more necessary in that jurisdiction where there is no equivalent constitutional guarantee of fair procedures. The reality is that the rights-based approach is so strongly supported by the corollary to the presumption of constitutionality identified in East Donegal Co-Operative Livestock Mart Ltd v Attorney General<a href="https://login-westlaw-ie.tudublin.idm.oclc.org/maf/wlie/app/document?src=toce&amp;docguid=I1EB1BFD28CB0411FAD36B4F05DC09DE6&amp;crumb-action=append&amp;context=6#fn-61"><sup>61</sup></a><sup> </sup>that the courts in this jurisdiction may not feel the need, as perhaps their counterparts in England and Wales have done, to embrace the broader rationale. Hilary Biehler</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-29 19:09:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/stephencarruthers/kwmwh9tl75bg1x56/wish/2120043776</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
