This is an infographic created by an illustrator and filmmaker in Paris. She published this in French and English in response to the rise of Islmaphobia in Europe, Asia and America. This source is important because it shows how sad it is that the public needs a guide on how to stop harassment towards certain peoples. 

Haidt states several times throughout the article that globalists tend to have an umbrella knee jerk reaction to nationalism by dismissing it as racism. While in some cases this could have truth, this statement is provocative to the many nationalists who do not support racism but do prioritize their own nation state. In turn, more time should be spent to understand the motives behind nationalism, but not necessarily accepting their ideals. Additionally, more open values, while bolstering the understanding of globalism, will also in turn create a nationalistic reaction.

Israeli history professor, Yuval Noah Harari, explains how nationalism and globalism has shifted 19th century political polarization and focus, and how these are a result of humans losing a clear common sight of what they want for the world.

As a whole, Nationalism serves to hold a country together through the connection and understanding between a government and its people. The moral bond of a government and its people results in: lower crime rates, lower transaction costs for businesses, higher levels of prosperity, and a propensity toward generosity, among others. In other words, this ideology counteracts the “anomie”, or normlessness, as described by Emile Durkheim. When compared with globalism, the main issue arises with how the very connotation of globalism now evokes a sense of racial bigotry and general negativity. 

Some of the most profound perspectives and observation from Haidt are found in the discussion of the nature of racism and his descriptions of the general trends that the racism follows. Racism in and of itself is described as a psychological predisposition, and this perspective of dissenting backgrounds will always cause a conflict. Thus, the real focus is outlined to not be focused on whether or not and where it exists, but it should instead be on when they come up and what causes them. This relates to the second take away, which describes the general trends towards tolerance in our nation, along with a powerful and authoritarian-driven backlash that is predicted by Stenner to follow. 

 

https://www.ted.com/talks/yuval_noah_harari_nationalism_vs_globalism_the_new_political_divide 
 

Yuval Noah Harari at TED Dialogues explores political divisiveness and current turmoil in relation to the nationalism vs globalism debate. 

 2. The main points of nationalism and globalization differ but that doesn't mean that one ideology is superior to another. I believe that we can take away that neither is necessarily better than the other and in order to have a successful nation-state the views of each side must be taken into account, such as immigration. Globally the topic of immigration is widely accepted to be good and refugees are welcomed into a state if need be, but from a national standpoint this seems as though it would be a disadvantage for the people already living there.
Outside Source:
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/an-insubordinate-president/
this article discusses how the current president of the united states has a strictly nationalistic view point and it is causing diplomatic problems in many many aspects. If the ideologies of globalization were taken into consideration such events as tweeting against North Korea may not have occurred.

https://scroll.in/latest/857836/nationalism-is-the-biggest-factor-for-bjp-in-gujarat-polls-chief-minister-vijay-rupani-tells-ndtv 

This is one of the major parties in India that champions Nationalism as a way to unify the people and make India more economically competitive.

 

With globalism, the opposite type of attitude is shown as supporters believe that coming together with other countries would make them stronger than simply being nationalist. They believe that immigration is good as it promotes the combination of other countries creating a stronger union. Globalists believe that nationalists are racists, as they don't promote immigration and feel proud of their country’s own achievements

Nationalism should be used rather than globalism, to unite the country in crisis. When a problem arises and the country needs to come together and fight rather than just let foreigners come in.

Outside Source
http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2014/04/22/3989671.htm
Nationalism can be created in a country if people can accept other people's values and differences but are still united by their common nationalist ideal.

We believe that nationalism is necessary during periods of international conflict, in order to bolster morale and further the safety of one’s own country. Obviously, this is an extreme case, but even during times of peace, a sense of nationalism should be maintained in order to satisfy the patriotic tendencies of citizens. Globalism, particularly economic globalism such as sending manufacturing jobs to less prosperous countries, is only successful when a country’s population is stable enough to maintain their personal economic stability. 

2. 

Additional Source :https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-08-24/there-are-parallels-between-polish-and-american-white-nationalist-movements
Details the (concerning) similarities between the rise of nationalism and white supremacy in the US vs. Poland, including factors such as anti-immigration sentiment, Nazi paraphernalia, and a rise in hate speech.

2. The first biggest takeaway is that nationalism and racism are two separate concepts, and that they can not be synonymous to each other. The largest driving force behind nationalism is the incapability felt by one group of people when they are met by another foreign group of people. Another takeaway from the article is that globalism and nationalism are both correlated with each other, and are not opposing forces. 

3. http://www.newsweek.com/how-paris-attacks-changed-europe-nationalism-709210 

This is an article by Newsweek about the attacks in Paris  and around Europe have led to a new rise of Nationalism. The article is for the most part unbiased, and Newsweek is a generally well-credited source. 

2. The biggest takeaways from the article were the messages that nationalism wasn't necessarily equitable to racism. Not only that, but it was also interesting to see the benefits which stem from a nationalistic society. Additionally, the claim where increased living standards combined with democratic capitalism serve as a base for more tolerant ideas is a major point.  
It implies that nationalism and the rise of the Right would only foster only poorer economic or threatened conditions

which is further proven when many of the supporters of far-right populism are there because they feel threatened.

Outside sources: 
As shown in this political cartoon, the artist believes that institutions such as the EU is a failed plan being sunk. He attributes its failure to debt, waves of immigration, Islam, Polotical Correctness, and Regulation. He believes then that the solution should be a more nationalistic Nation and leave. 

 2. We feel that the first big takeaway was how the gap between globalists and nationalists is widening, preventing compromise on big issues such as the refugee crisis, and how when each group tries to talk about other big issues or pull in one direction the other pulls back. This is shown by the Brexit vote, where the majority happened to be the nationalists who were opposed to immigration and assimilation of culture following the large acceptance of refugees in the EU. The other big takeaway was the psychological difference between authoritarians and conservatives, especially in relation to the psychological study regarding the “button” that is pushed in authoritarians heads when faced with a moral challenge, as opposed to the decisive nature of other thinkers when faced with these issues. This helps to highlight the issues that our planet is facing, as there has been a recent uprising of authoritarian thought as refugee crises arise globally.
------------------------------------------
We found this article about President Trump withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement, which is interesting because it shows how an authoritarian faction is more focused on nationalism and national expansion instead of globalism. You should read it because it has a very good perspective on the issue. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climate-agreement.html

 

2. One of the main takeaways from Haidt’s exploration is that a sort of balance must exist between globalists and nationalists, and without attempts to consider the implications of both viewpoints, a nation risks extreme polarization, in which the threat of authoritarianism can manifest. Additionally, Haidt conveys that nations have respective needs and what works for one may not work for another. In terms of nationalism and globalism, this implies that it can be reasonable for a nation to want to preserve a national and cultural distinction from its neighbors. Donald Tusk accurately embodied this argument by chastising himself and his colleagues for advocating a unified Europe without nation-states because it created a dangerous nationalistic backlash. 

This is a political cartoon depicting a major problem with nationalism in America. An alleged rapist is winning votes in Alabama just because the people refuse to vote for a democrat, albeit moderate.

Nationalism calls on citizens to love and serve their country, and governments to protect their own people. According to a Nationalistic ideology, in order to protect the people, a government must place their citizens’ interests above the interests of people in other countries. This benefits a society by facilitating a preservation of culture. Furthermore, trust is promoted in a society through a shared sense of identity and history. In the age of Globalism, it is easy for native traditions to be diluted, but with Nationalism, it is much easier to preserve the cultural aspects of society. 

2.
One takeaway from this article was that Nationalism is not a racist, but a duty bound movement. Citizens have a duty to love and serve their country, and governments are duty bound to protect their own people. Our second take away was that countries seem to move in two directions, along two axes: first, as they industrialize, they move away from “traditional values” in which religion, ritual, and deference to authorities are important, and toward “secular rational” values that are more open to change, progress, and social engineering based on rational considerations. 

3.

theweek.com/articles/708565/peculiar-nationalism-canada 

http://apjjf.org/2017/10/Postel-Vinay.html
This article discusses how the opposing sides of the nationalism and globalism are present in Japanese society attribute to its own political climate. The article suggests that the problems the United States and Europe have been experiencing, were present in Japan beforehand.

About the comic:

The comic displays the EU essentially stuck between a rock and a hard place. There is no way for the Union to remain ignorant of these situations yet those problems do not have satisfactory or effective solutions, as of now.

https://www.usnews.com/cartoons/immigration-cartoons?slide=15

This cartoon relates to the current rise in nationalism because like the article by Haidt stated, it shows an American nationalist trying to protect his group or society from outsiders. The cartoon insinuates that Mexicans, Muslims, and refugees are regarded as “normative threats” to the American population.

Another thing we took away from this article was the different Haidt conveys when he shows the views of both nationalist and globalist on immigration and the widening differences between the two groups. While the globalist are in favor of it and the nationalist are against it Haidt brings up a point on the side of the nationalist saying that their reasoning for it is that having people from within their country  with the same identity, norms, and history generally promotes trust which immigrants do not have. Haidt contrasts this with the globalist who are “cheering”  on immigrants to come showing how they are so different from nationalist.

2. An important point that the article makes it that the world needs to figure out how to strike a balance between the globalist and nationalist identities in order to live in peace. This is significant because these two values are on the opposite ends of the spectrum, and finding an equilibrium takes time, patience, and diplomacy that western democracies need to muster.

Another main tenant of the article is that many of the shaken up aspects of our world today are governed by the nationalist agenda. No matter which part of the world you are from, there will always be nationalists because they are vocal. This concept is something that countries and their governments will always struggle to deal with.

This video of Biden speaking on Trump’s actions represents a large part of the liberals in the United States. I think that even though it is clearly a left wing opinion, that people across the ideological spectrum need to hear this as it presents current events with a charged perspective that evokes pathos.