<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of Week 2: Peer review Research peer review online and summarise the following: What is peer review? What is the process? Why is it used? Where would you find peer review content? What is the potential problem with peer review? by Lada T Price</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-01-23 20:46:55 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-03 10:15:51 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Kyrie Green</title>
         <author>b6032623</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161695</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-&nbsp; A peer review is when other people (your peers) look at your work before you send it off<br>-&nbsp; It is used to give you detailed and constructive criticism so your work can be better<br>-&nbsp; You would find peer review content with whoever you gave your work to<br>-  Potential problems with peer review are that you might not like what they have changed and might not agree with it</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:23:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161695</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lizzie</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161825</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Editor finds 2/3 individuals who are experts on the specific topic in which you are covering. They give feedback and advise whether it should be published.<br>2. Process: academics read through the work, they make comments on what to change, then you can make the necessary changes, the editor then publishes the work.<br>3. It is used to check the originality and research of the work and helps you better your work with any feedback given.<br>4.&nbsp;<br>5. Problems: bias?-someone's opinion, time consuming and expensive, </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161825</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rob</title>
         <author>robert_monson10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161843</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer review is the process of reviewing your peers.<br><br>An editor will find and contact two or three other researchers or academics who are experts in your field. They will be asked to read your article, and advise the editor whether to publish your paper in that journal.&nbsp;<br><br>Negatives are that it can cause lengthy delays in the dissemination of research findings. It is a time consuming process which places considerable demands on the academic community.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161843</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Elle &amp; Sam</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161856</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>peer review is;</div><div>It’s the evaluation of academic or professional work in the same field. <br><br>what is the process; <br>The editor recieves the paper, who selects people to invite to peer review the work. They then collect the constructive criticism and the paper is amended and then resubmitted <br><br>why is it used;<br>To get critical feedback and response of a professional. <br><br>h</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161856</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chloe &amp; Branwyn</title>
         <author>b6003365</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161872</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>What is a peer review?</strong>&nbsp;</div><div>2/3 academics or researchers in your field evaluate your work</div><div><strong>What is the process?</strong>&nbsp;</div><ul><li>Academics read through the article&nbsp;</li><li>Receive comments on what to change/amend&nbsp;</li><li>Make the amendments and resubmit&nbsp;</li></ul><div><strong>Why is it used?</strong>&nbsp;</div><ul><li>To check your work is original/new&nbsp;</li><li>Make sure your method is appropriate&nbsp;</li><li>Check your results are laid out clearly&nbsp;</li><li>Check your conclusions are reliable&nbsp;</li><li>Check standard of work is high&nbsp;</li></ul><div><strong>Where would you find it?<br><br>Problems</strong></div><ul><li>Matter of opinion</li><li>Disagreements</li><li>Time Taken </li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161872</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kurt</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161948</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> </div><div>they will be checking:<br><br></div><ul><li>your work is original or new;</li><li>your study design and methodology are appropriate and described so that others could replicate what you’ve done;</li><li>you’ve presented your results clearly and appropriately;</li><li>your conclusions are reliable and significant;</li><li>the work is of a high enough standard to be published in the journal. </li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161948</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jack and Dan</title>
         <author>b6005120</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161971</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) Peers review your work<br>2) You submit your article to Taylor &amp; Francis, it is then reviewed by 2-3 peers.<br>3) It is used to gain feedback on your work in order to improve it&nbsp;</div><div>4) You can find the peer review content on the Taylor &amp; Francis website<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161971</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Louis</title>
         <author>b6029341</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161981</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer review is when independent experts in your field evaluate and comment on your research before it is published. <br>The process starts with the editor receiving the paper and selects reviewers who are sent the paper. The reviewers read the paper and provide the editor with comments and suggestions, amendments are made and the paper is resubmitted.<br>Peer reviews are used to ensure submitted articles are suitable for the journal and its readers, to gain detailed and constructive feedback, alerted to any errors, create discussion between author, reviewers, editor etc.<br>You would find peer reviews on Taylor &amp; Francis Online.<br>Problems - time consuming?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:24:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224161981</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rebecca</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224162374</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer reviewing is&nbsp;a stage in producing an academic paper whereby other experts/researchers within the same field review the work, in order to decide if it's appropriate for publishing.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:26:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224162374</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jimmy</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224162583</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer reviews are used to assess and analyse the quality of a piece of work, conducted by experts of the respective field.<br><br>90% of researchers suggest that peer review is beneficial to pieces of work.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:27:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224162583</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kurt</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224163142</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Peer review can take many forms. The most common types are:<br><br></div><div><strong>Single-blind</strong>: the reviewers know that you are the author of the article, but you don’t know who the reviewers are.<br><br></div><div><strong>Double-blind</strong>: the reviewers don’t know that you are the author of the article, and you don’t know who the reviewers are either.<br><br></div><div><strong>Open review</strong>: you know the names of the reviewers, and they know your name too. Open review may include publishing the reviews alongside the article.<br><br></div><div><strong>Post-publication review</strong>: after your article is published, readers can comment on it.<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-24 11:29:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lada_price/ks8ypc9kblfi/wish/224163142</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
