Compromises by Petty

Compromises by Petty https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0 Block 8 en-us 2017-09-27 18:40:27 UTC 2017-09-27 22:42:34 UTC hello@padlet.com Mayson Montez https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191835851 Connecticut Compromise: With the Connecticut Compromise, the conflict was that big states wanted representatives based on population, while small states wanted representatives based on equality. So it was agreed that each state would have representatives based on population and equality in the Senate.
3/5's Compromise: In 1787, slaves and free black men and women wanted the right to vote. Congress couldn't let enough of their pride go to give them a full-valued vote, so every vote entered by a black man would only count as 3/5 of a vote.
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise: At this point, some people were starting to get sick and tired of the whole slave trading business and wanted it to come to an end, but southern farmers and slave holders argued that the slaves were important to the rate of production of their farms. In result, the slave trading business was given 20 more years and then they would be shut down. In addition, the government was beginning to want to have the power to put a tax on the exporting of goods, but they were denied of that. ]]> 2017-09-27 18:56:21 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191835851 Maddie Adamson https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836087 *The Connecticut Compromise issue was big and little states weren't getting the representation that they wanted so they resolved it with 3 branches two houses in congress and the house of representatives based on population and the senate is equal.
*The 3/5th's Compromise issue was slaves were only counted as 3/5th's of a person because of their skin tone and they wanted to be equal with the other people and didnt want to work for anyone. So they were eventually given a full vote.
*Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was put in place because citizens were trying to tax there own goods for too much. So the states made a law protecting the power to tax the export of goods to any state]]> 2017-09-27 18:56:48 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836087 Kylie Reynolds https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836142 Resolution
Connecticut Compromise- resolved a conflict between two states.
3/5ths Compromise- outlined the process of the population in order to determine representation and taxation for the federal government
Commerce and Slave Trade compromise- resolved the controversial of slave trade
Conflicts
Connecticut Compromise- Two states could not agree over one plan
3/5ths Compromise- slaves were counted as 3/5ths of one person
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise- The state was taxing everything ]]> 2017-09-27 18:56:55 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836142 Amber https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836165 Connecticut Compromise- The states wanted different things. This problem was solved by giving all the states the same amount of power (senate)

3/5ths Compromise- The states wanted to count there slaves to get a higher amount of population. So they decided to consider a slave 3/5ths of a person letting the states have more representatives.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise- Half of the states wanted congress to regulate policies and the other half was scared that is congress got control it would end slavery. The decided not to stop slavery but any new imports of slavery will be taxed.]]> 2017-09-27 18:56:57 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836165 McKenna Jones https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836174 The Connecticut compromise had a conflict of a bunch of different states wanted different ways to set up their government. They solved this by taking everyone's ideas and joining them to make everyone happy.

]]> 2017-09-27 18:56:59 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836174 Lillian Heitkamp https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836259 The conflict of the Connecticut Compromise was that the large and the small states could not agree on which method of representation they wanted to go with, so the resolution was to incorporate both methods of representation into one congressional branch with two houses. One house would represent each separate idea.

The conflict of the 3/5 compromise was the southern states did not agree with the way the population was dealt with, because the majority of their population were slaves, but the slaves weren't counted as people. This meant that the southern states had very little counted population. This upset them. The resolution to this conflict was that it was decided that slaves were to count as 3/5 of a person. This gave the southern states a more representative population in their own eye, even though they did not include the slaves in any government decisions.

The conflict of the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was that the north wanted to place taxes on imports and exports of the South to and from Britain. This was because they wanted the south to trade with them. The south, however, decided that they liked the British goods better and continued trade with them. The other side of the conflict was that the north was afraid that because of the 3/5 compromise, the south would increase importation of slaves to greatly increase their role and influence in the government. The resulting resolution was to place taxes on imported goods, but to ensure no tax would be placed on exported goods. The other side to the compromise was that the government could not interfere with the slave trade until the year 1808. In revisions of the document, a taxation rate of $10 a slave were placed on import of slaves. ]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:10 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836259 Cassandra Roth https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836295 Connecticut Compromise:
Conflict- The larger states wanted to have the number of representatives based off of population where as the smaller states wanted it to be a set number that was equal to all states

Resolution- The Senate became a set number while the House of Representatives became population based

3/5ths Compromise:
Conflict- They could not agree on the eligibility of slaves to vote

Resolution- They said that every slave's vote equals 3/5th of a white man's vote

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict- Northern States wanted to regulate trade but the Southern States were afraid of the taxes

Resolution- Both sides agreed to let the Government handle all interstate and international trade taxes]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:14 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836295 Connecticut Compromise (Great Compromise) https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836397 2017-09-27 18:57:30 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836397 Abby D. https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836481 The Connecticut Compromise: Conflict- states wanted a different way to run the house and senate
Resolution- All states have equal amount of people in senate. Representatives are based on population

3/5 Compromise:
Conflict- Slaves and black free men wanted the right to vote. Their votes only counted for 3/5th's of a vote.
Resolution- They were soon granted the right to have a full count in voting

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict- Southern states were creating their own taxes and the Northerners and Congress wanted to control what they tax on
Resolution- they made a law that protects the right for states to have their own taxes on imported goods.

]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:41 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836481 Dalton Jones https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836508 Connecticut Compromise
conflicts: were that they had a bunch of states that wanted different ways to have their government.

Solution:The way they solved this is they took everyone's ideas and combined they to then make everyone happy.

3/5th Compromise
Conflict: Slaves and free black men only counted as 3/5 for a vote.

Solution: They granted the right to vote fully to the blacks.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise

Conflict: Northern States wanted to regulate trade but the Southern States were afraid of the taxes

Solution: both sides agreed to let the government handle all interstate and international trade taxes.

]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:47 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836508 Anthony Guarino guarinoa554 https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836583 Connecticut Compromise:
Conflict: The States at the Constitutional Convention couldn't agree between The Virginia Plan or The New Jersey Plan.

Resolution: They Combined the styles of Representation to make
The Connecticut Compromise.

3/5ths Compromise:
Conflict: Slave States wanted their Slaves to count towards their population.

Resolution: Each Slave would be counted as 3/5ths of a Person.
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict: Agricultural States were afraid of Exportation Taxes

Resolution: Forbid Congress from Taxing any Exports of goods from and State]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:54 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836583 Mercedes Lamia https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836622 With the Connecticut Compromise, the conflict was that there were big and little states that wanted representation so they had to resolve it by agreeing to establish a two house national legislature, with all states having equal representation in one house, and each state having representation based on it's population.

3/5ths compromise-
The slaves would be counted as 3/5ths in total when assigning representatives, as well as presidential electors and taxes.They resolved it by having the constitutional agreement to count three fifths of a state slaves as a population for purposes of representation and taxation.

commerce and slave trade compromise-
Was an agreement during the constitutional convention of 1787 protecting the interest of slave holders by forbidding congress the power to tax the export of goods from any state. How they resolved the issue was by a compromise bopposed that said the federal government was given some authority over commerce, with the agreement that congress would not prohibit the slave trade until 1808 . however, it agreed that the federal government could tax the importation of people to be used as slaves from other nations.]]> 2017-09-27 18:57:59 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836622 Katie https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836651 Connecticut Compromise: the conflict was the different states didn't want the same thing. How they solved this was by taking all the ideas together that put different ideas together.
3/5 compromise: The slaves would be counted as three-fifths in the total when apportioning representatives and presidential electors an taxes. The resolution was that every slave voted equal
commerce and slave trade: The constitutional convention protected slave holders
the resolution: protected the interest of slaveholders and forbidding congress the power to tax the export of any goods from any states ]]> 2017-09-27 18:58:02 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836651 Tyler Bridgewater https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836709 Connecticut Compromise:
Conflict- The smaller states wanted equal reprentatives but the bigger states wanted to have more reprsentatives.
Solution- Dual system of reprsentatives.

3/5th Compromise:
Conflict- Slaves and free black men only counted as 3/5 for a vote.
Solution- Granted the right to vote fully.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict-North states wanted to reguate trade but the south didn't want to pay the taxes.
Solution- Made a new law that protects the right for states to have thier own taxes on goods.]]> 2017-09-27 18:58:08 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191836709 Dakota https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837003 Connecticut Compromise
conflict: The larger state wanted to have the number based off of population where as the smaller states wanted it to be a set number that was the same for every state
resolution: The senate was equal and the house was based on population
3/5 Compromise
conflict: Slaves and black free men wanted the right to vote. Their votes only counted for 3/5s vote
resolution: They were soon granted the right to vote
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise
conflict: The states in the north wanted congress to regulate the buying and selling of slaves, but the people in the south opposed it because they feared congress would its authority to end slave trade
resolution: Congress couldn't prohibit the slave trade but a tax was placed on important slaves ]]> 2017-09-27 18:58:46 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837003 Mason C https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837013 Connecticut Compromise: There was the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan but they couldn't decide which one to use so the Connecticut Compromise combined the two.

3/5 Compromise: States wanted slaves to count for their population so the solution was slave counted as 3/5 of a person.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise: The North wanted Congress to regulate commerce but the South didn't because they feared that would give them power to get rid of slaves therefore North agreed they wouldn't ban slaves until 1808 but they could be taxed.]]> 2017-09-27 18:58:48 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837013 Jenna Teeter https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837014 Connecticut Compromise:
Conflict: The Connecticut Compromise resolved a conflict between big states and small states at the Constitutional Convention. Without it, the Constitution would not have been passed.
Resolution: Everyone was given an equal number of Representatives.

3/5ths Compromise:
Conflict: The population of slaves would be counted as three-fifths in total when apportioning Representatives, as well as Presidential electors and taxes.
Resolution: The Three Fifths Compromise resolved the issue of counting slaves towards population in regards to representation in the House of Representatives.
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict: The federal government was given some authority over commerce, with the agreement that Congress would not prohibit the slave trade until 1808.
Resolution: It was agreed that the federal government could tax the importation of people to be used as slaves from other nations.

]]> 2017-09-27 18:58:48 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837014 Corey Whitesel https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837202 Connecticut Compromise:
-The Conflict... America was try to set up a Legislature .
-The Resolution... They Kept the Representation & the (Bicameral) Legislature.

3/5th Compromise:
-The Conflict... The South thought they needed more representation, due to having more people, mostly slaves. They only counted the slaves as actual people when it came to representation & getting money
The Resolution... A solution tot his problem was Congress only counted slaves as 3/5ths human beings when it came to representation, so there for the South got more representations.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
-The Conflict... The North States wanted Congress to look into the Buying & Selling of Slaves, but Southerns said No because they were fearful that Congress would use that to end slavery.
-The Resolution... Congress couldn't stop Slavery, but they could put a Tax on Imported or Transported Slaves. ]]> 2017-09-27 18:59:13 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837202 Cameron Steward https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837502 The connecticut compromise:
Problem- The smaller states wanted equal representatives while the bigger states wanted to have more since they have a bigger population.
Resolution- They made it where there were 3 branches, senate is equal, representatives based off of population, 2 houses in congress.
The 3/5ths's Compromise:
Problem- The south wanted to have more representatives since they had more people.
Resolution- They counted slaves as 3/5th's of a person so the southern states had more represenatives.
Commerce and Slade Trade compromise:
Problem- Northern states wanted the congress to regulate slave trade, but the southern states didn't want it to happen because they didn't want the congress to use its power to stop the slave trade.
Resolution- They couldn't stop slave trade but they could put a tax on imported slaves.]]> 2017-09-27 18:59:58 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191837502 Chase Willis https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838191 Connecticut Compromise
* The conflict was setting up a new legislature for the America. The resolution was they kept the bicameral legislature and representation
3/5th Compromise
* The South felt like they should have more representative because they had more "people". They only counted slaves as people when it came to representation, but they viewed slaves as property. As a solution to the problem, congress counted slaves as 3/5ths of a person, which gave the south more representatives
Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise
* The conflict was the states in the north wanted congress to regulate the buying and selling of slaves, but the people in the south opposed it because they feared congress would use its authority to end slave trade. The resolution was that congress could not prohibit the slave trade but a tax was placed on imported slaves.]]> 2017-09-27 19:01:36 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838191 Taylor Storm https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838555 Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:
Conflict- Controversial issue of Commerce relating to slave trading
Resolution- Slave Trade Compromise

3/5ths Compromise:
Conflict- Institution of slavery and its consequences
Resolution- The population of slaves would be counted as three-fifths in total when apportioning representatives, as well as presidential electors and taxes

Connecticut Compromise:
Conflict- Setting up new legislature for America
Resolution- Kept bicameral legislature and representation

]]> 2017-09-27 19:02:32 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838555 Connecticut compromise by Ivy Walton https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838581 representation in congress was the conflict. the Connecticut compromise solved this conflict by creating a bicameral legislature that appeased both sides. the senate had the equal representation that the small states wanted, and the house had the representation based on population that the big states wanted.

slave trade compromise
the commerce and slave trade was presented at the constitutional convention. one of the major disputes was over an issue of the states in the north wanted congress to have power to regulate commerce.

3/5 compromise
southern states with a large slave population felt they weren't being fairly represented in the house of representatives, so an agreement was made that slaves counted as 3/5 total when apportioning representatives. ]]> 2017-09-27 19:02:35 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838581 Kaitlynn Franks https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838591 Connecticut Compromise:

Conflict: We had two different plans. The larger states liked the Virginia Plan because the number of votes/ representatives was based on the states population. However the smaller states liked the New Jersey Plan because each state had the same amount of votes/representatives.
Resolution: We created two houses. The Senate which is equal and the House of Representatives which is based on population.

3/5's Compromise:

Conflict: Southern States with slaves wanted blacks to be counted with whites so that their population would be bigger and they would get more votes/representatives.
Resolution: So the 3/5's compromise allowed the states to count 3/5's of the slave population to determine how many votes/representatives the state gets.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise:

Conflict: The states in the north wanted Congress to have the power the regulate the activity of buying and selling in large amounts. However the Southern states feared that if this happened then Congress would end the slave trade.
Resolution: In the end Congress could regulate the activity of buying and selling in large amounts but congress could not get rid of the slave trade. However slaves being imported could be taxed.

]]> 2017-09-27 19:02:37 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191838591 McKenna Jones (cont.) jonesm869 https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191892747 *3/5th's compromise-- the conflict was slavery and the resolution was that the slaves would count as 3/5th's of a person.
*commerce and slave trade compromise-- the conflict was how slave trading should have been handled and was resolved by the slave trade compromise]]> 2017-09-27 22:39:16 UTC https://padlet.com/zpetty/krw86xlgzjo0/wish/191892747