2. Savana Redding, an 8th grader at Safford middle school, was strip-searched by school officals on the basis of a tip by another student that Ms.Redding may have ibuprofen on her person in violation of school policy.

3. Does the fourth amendment prohibit school officials from strip-searching students suspected of professing drugs in violation of school policy?

4. 8-1 decision for Safford Unified School District.

5. The Supreme court held that Savana's fourth amendment right were violated when school officials searched her underwear for non-prescription painkillers.

6. School officials did not have sufficient suspicion to warrant extending the search of Savana to her underwear.

Link- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-479

3.Acton claimed a urine sample was a violation of his 4th Amendment Right. The court was asked to decide if random drug testing of school athletes was in violation of the search and seizure part of the 4th Amendment.

4. The court ruled 6-3 that it was not in violation of the 4th Amendment rights.

5. The court said that the condition of taking samples was no different than a public restroom and only limited authority can view the results.

6. The precedence is that schools have the right to random drug test because it is not a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Link: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/94-590

Key Events Leading to the Case: T.L.O was suspected of selling drugs because police found a list containing the names of students who owed him money. T.L.O was given one year probation and was freed once his fourth amendment was put into power it had no effect on the outcome..

What was the Legal issue: T.L.O was assumed to be selling drugs because the police officers were searching a girl's purse and just so happen to find the list.

How did the Court Decide the Case: the Supreme had no decision about the case it was anonymous opinion.

Why did the Court Decide that Decision: because T.L.O was still found guilty because he was still selling drugs

2.Weeks got his office searched by officers without a warrant and they found evidence about a suspected use of the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets, which was prohibited by federal law.

3. The question was if it was a violation of weeks 4th amendment right.

4.Justice Day delivered the Court's unanimous decision to overturn Weeks's conviction. The Court declared illegally gained evidence "fruit of the poison tree" and ordered that illegally gained evidence be excluded in the future from any federal court. (Pearson).

5. Because the officers went through his stuff with out his consent violating his 4th amendment right

6. Cant go through others stuff when they dont give consent.

http://www.phschool.com/atschool/ss_web_codes/supreme_court_cases/weeks.html