https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i en-us 2023-01-23 14:17:48 UTC 2023-03-08 10:25:28 UTC hello@padlet.com 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453302458 no it is not more than 50 million dogs, cats , monkeys, rabbits, rats and many other animals are forced to do painful experiments and are deliberately sickened with toxic chemicals or infected by a diseases, live in cages and are normally killed when the experiment ends ]]> 2023-01-23 14:27:56 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453302458 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453332229
Scientists use animals to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals, and to assure the safety of new medical treatments. Some of these problems involve processes that can only be studied in a living organism.

]]> 2023-01-23 14:45:56 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453332229 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453338828
Millions of animal bodies — as well as supplies such as bedding, caging, needles, and syringes — are disposed of each year. The routine disposal of hazardous waste also produces harmful substances and air pollutants.]]> 2023-01-23 14:49:45 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453338828 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453341729
Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Scientists are able to test vaccines on humans volunteers. Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects.

]]> 2023-01-23 14:51:29 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453341729 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453358328
]]> 2023-01-23 15:01:38 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2453358328 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2461486235
Of the 969 respondents questioned, 68% agreed that they can accept the use of animals in research for medical purposes where there are no alternatives – such as using computer modelling, in vitro testing or MRI scanning.

Results also revealed that 60% accepted the use of animals in research to help our understanding of the human body and 64% accepted use to increase understanding of animal health, where no alternative exists. Around half agreed that animals should only be used in medical research into ‘life-threatening or debilitating diseases’.


]]> 2023-01-30 14:31:23 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2461486235 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2461500207
Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free.

Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them. The complete lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situation cause some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves. After enduring a life of pain, loneliness, and terror, almost all of them will be killed.]]> 2023-01-30 14:38:48 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2461500207 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2473307403 Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free.

Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them. The complete lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situation cause some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves. After enduring a life of pain, loneliness, and terror, almost all of them will be killed.
There are many non-animal test methods that can be used in place of animal testing. Not only are these non-animal tests more humane, they also have the potential to be cheaper, faster, and more relevant to humans.

While some of the experimentation conducted on animals today is required by law, most of it isn’t. In fact, a number of countries have implemented bans on the testing of certain types of consumer goods on animals, such as the cosmetics-testing bans in the European Union, India, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, and elsewhere.]]> 2023-02-08 12:11:10 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2473307403 16aliceb https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2497971127 The term “animal testing” refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be re-used in subsequent experiments. Here is a selection of common animal procedures:


Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.[1]
92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.[2]
Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA).[3]
Up to 90% of animals used in U.S. labs are not counted in the official statistics of animals tested. Take a stand by kidnapping your friends’ products that were tested on animals (seriously!). Sign up for Kidnapped Cosmetics.[4]
Europe, the world’s largest cosmetic market, Israel and India have already banned animal testing for cosmetics, and the sale or import of newly animal-tested beauty products.[5]
Even animals that are protected under the AWA can be abused and tortured. And the law doesn’t require the use of valid alternatives to animals, even if they are available.[6]
According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals.[7]
In tests of potential carcinogens, subjects are given a substance every day for 2 years. Others tests involve killing pregnant animals and testing their fetuses.[8]
The real-life applications for some of the tested substances are as trivial as an “improved” laundry detergent, new eye shadow, or copycat drugs to replace a profitable pharmaceutical whose patent expired.[9]
Alternative tests achieve one or more of the “3 R’s:” replaces a procedure that uses animals with a procedure that doesn’t, reduces the number of animals used in a procedure, refines a procedure to alleviate or minimize potential animal pain.[10]
Several cosmetic tests commonly performed on mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs include: skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed on shaved skin or dripped into the eyes without any pain relief.[11]
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "Top Five Shocking Animal Experimentation Facts." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

New England Anti-Vivisection Society. "Laws and Regulations | Animal Use in Research." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

Humane Society International. "About Animal Testing." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

Humane Society International & The Humane Society of the United States. "Infographic: Ending Animal Testing For Cosmetics." Web Accessed March 2, 2015. ↩︎

Vanderau, Melanie L. "Science at any cost: The ineffectiveness and underenforcement of the Animal Welfare Act." Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 14 (2006): 721-721. ↩︎

Moxley, Angela. "The End of Animal Testing." The Humane Society of the United States, 2010. Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

Moxley, Angela. "The End of Animal Testing." The Humane Society of the United States, 2010. Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

Moxley, Angela. "The End of Animal Testing." The Humane Society of the United States, 2010. Web Accessed March 3, 2015. ↩︎

Ibrahim, Darian M. "Reduce, refine, replace: The failure of the three R's and the future of animal experimentation." U. Chi. Legal F, 2006. Web Accessed March 20, 2015. ↩︎

Humane Society of the United States. "Fact Sheet: Animal Testing." Web accessed November 2, 2015. ↩︎]]> 2023-02-28 13:48:40 UTC https://padlet.com/16aliceb/ki3dk0sz7sabqb4i/wish/2497971127