https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6 You may answer these questions out loud or here in the Padlet, but everyone should contribute to the conversation at some point this week. en-us 2021-04-07 16:40:37 UTC 2026-01-18 17:45:01 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396766266 What I noticed when other perspectives were address, the would start off “According to..... (the article name and author)” and they would put the quote or paraphrase of what the author perspective is and what they believe about the topic.]]> 2021-04-08 16:45:35 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396766266 21600381 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396769100 I notice that the good examples being their IWAs by starting general and then narrowing down towards a more specific pathway. For example, the one about Suicide starts by saying death is inevitable but then shifts towards suicide, specifically suicide help. Another example is the divorce paper. It starts off saying no marriage is perfect but then shifts towards the effect divorce has on an adolescent's well being. It shows how you can transition from a larger topic/general theme to a specific issue whether it is a position based or solution based argument.]]> 2021-04-08 16:46:15 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396769100 22602441 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396774059 They had different sections dedicated to different perspectives instead of it just being one whole IWA. Also the one I read didn’t seem to have a whole section dedicated to a solution but kind of meshed with the conclusion in their IWA]]> 2021-04-08 16:47:23 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396774059 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396776440 -The sections were organized and different perspectives didn’t mix with one another 
-When they began, they didn’t start off with a quote or article, they began with a simple introduction of what they knew about the topic or small background information before addressing the situation ]]> 2021-04-08 16:47:55 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396776440 2360415 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396776720 Speak generally on their topic and explain the different ideas people have on the issue. Then they create their thesis/state their argument. ]]> 2021-04-08 16:47:58 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396776720 21605711 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396777189 I noticed that the good examples begin their IWAs by introducing the topic in a general and simplistic sense so that the reader can understand what they're diving into. They also section off each perspective that is broken down clearly and efficiently. ]]> 2021-04-08 16:48:05 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396777189 22603321 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396777929 I noticed how they started their IWA with a good and clear introduction to give some background about the issue that they were focusing on. ]]> 2021-04-08 16:48:14 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396777929 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396784854 Each author summarizes their reasoning, adding new details, and restates their argument in a conclusion paragraph.]]> 2021-04-08 16:49:39 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396784854 2360556 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396785332 Honestly, when doing my IWA, I was really concerned that my vocab wasn’t good enough or that I needed to sound more “professional” but when reading the IWAs that scored 5s, I noticed that they scored well because of the organization, format, and mainly, they all format the intro in a very direct way explaining the issue, the controversy, and potentially how to fix it. Overall, as long as you’re concise and actually answer, it should be fine]]> 2021-04-08 16:49:45 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396785332 2360415 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396789345 restate their claim and reinforce the main claims made in the body of the IWA.]]> 2021-04-08 16:50:37 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396789345 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396791024 -They have a conclusion if they were position based and/or solution if it was a problem/solution topic
-The conclusions was restate in shorter terms what the whole point of the argument was about 
-There were no articles or quotes at the end used in the conclusion(just something I noticed)]]> 2021-04-08 16:51:00 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396791024 22602441 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396793919 The assisted suicide IWA did a good job writing about the opposing side. They used quotes from physicians themselves which made it more credible but also giving some reasons why assisted suicide can be more helpful (for the economy)]]> 2021-04-08 16:51:36 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1396793919 2360099 https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1400202445 All of the IWA’s end their paper with a conclusion paragraph where they restate there argument in a different way. They also summarize their line of reasoning and overall sum up their paper.]]> 2021-04-09 14:49:02 UTC https://padlet.com/english218/khv4w46o14wz72f6/wish/1400202445