<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Chapter 14 Padlet by Marco</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0</link>
      <description>Made with swagger</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-11-21 00:36:12 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-19 12:46:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1.	How did the market revolution effect where international migrants came to AND its effect on the westward movement of Americans? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138977349</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Irish went to urban cities because they could not afford to go west. The Germans went to states like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The development of squatters also began. They were migrants who set up farms on unoccupied land without a legal title to do so. A lot of Americans moved west because they did not like the flow of the immigrants coming to America.<figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":247,"url":"http://americanrealismandimmigration.wikispaces.com/file/view/german_immigrants_2.jpg/193453006/german_immigrants_2.jpg","width":204}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="204" height="247" src="http://americanrealismandimmigration.wikispaces.com/file/view/german_immigrants_2.jpg/193453006/german_immigrants_2.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 00:38:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138977349</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2.	How did entrepreneurs help create a market revolution in production and commerce, in which market relationships between producers and consumers came to prevail as the manufacture of goods became more organized? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138979373</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Markets in the East developed, not only for produce but also for loans. Financing from the East allowed western farmers to acquire more land and supplies. The steel plow, invented by John Deer, made possible the rapid subduing of western prairies. The invention of the reaper, by Cyrus McCormick, increased the amount of wheat that a farmer could harvest.<figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":265,"url":"http://www2.lhric.org/pocantico/westward_expansion/johndeere.jpg","width":200}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="200" height="265" src="http://www2.lhric.org/pocantico/westward_expansion/johndeere.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 01:00:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138979373</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3.	How did innovations, including textile machinery, steam engines, interchangeable parts, the telegraph, and agricultural inventions, increase the efficiency of production methods? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138984891</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These innovations made the products get created faster and more efficient. Items like the cotton gin allowed the growing and selling of cotton on a large scale. Other innovations helped lessen how strenuous and difficult jobs were.<figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":225,"url":"http://bvapush.pbworks.com/f/1162842247/cottongin.jpg","width":268}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="268" height="225" src="http://bvapush.pbworks.com/f/1162842247/cottongin.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 02:01:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138984891</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4.	How did legislation and judicial systems support the development of roads, canals, and railroads, which extended and enlarged markets and helped foster regional interdependence? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138985634</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>They supported these developments in ways like starting construction of the national road or the Cumberland road. With the creation of the Erie Canal this blossomed industry.<br><figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":180,"url":"http://www.agclassroom.org/gan/timeline/pictures/1820_transportation.jpg","width":236}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="236" height="180" src="http://www.agclassroom.org/gan/timeline/pictures/1820_transportation.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 02:11:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138985634</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>5.	How did transportation networks link the North and Midwest more closely than either was linked to the South? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138986818</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The South remained politically, culturally, and ideologically distinct from the other sections, while continuing to rely on its exports to Europe for economic growth. While migrants from Europe increased the population in the East and the Midwest, forming strong bonds of interdependence between the Northeast and the Old Northwest.&nbsp;<figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":204,"url":"http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/NHJ_A_1.jpg/300px-NHJ_A_1.jpg","width":300}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="300" height="204" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/NHJ_A_1.jpg/300px-NHJ_A_1.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 02:27:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138986818</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>6.	How did the changes, caused by the market revolution, have on US society, workers’ lives, and gender and family relations? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138991950</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The market revolution helped to widen a gap between rich and poor, it helped shape emerging middle and working classes. It also caused an increasing separation between home and workplace, which led to a differnce in gender and in family roles and expectations.<figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":293,"url":"https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/25/5a/99/255a99bc2d65df0fe56d5c1ab4521e6b.jpg","width":236}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="236" height="293" src="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/25/5a/99/255a99bc2d65df0fe56d5c1ab4521e6b.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 03:43:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138991950</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>7.	How did the growth of manufacturing drive a significant increase in prosperity and standards of living for some? (pp. 304-306)</title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138992122</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><figure class="attachment attachment-preview" data-trix-attachment='{"contentType":"image","height":213,"url":"http://www.factfrenzy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/early-large-farming.jpg","width":300}' data-trix-content-type="image"><img width="300" height="213" src="http://www.factfrenzy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/early-large-farming.jpg"><figcaption class="caption"></figcaption></figure>It transformed a subsistence economy of scattered farms and tiny workshops into a national network of industry and commerce.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 03:46:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138992122</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>8.	In this chapter, the authors maintain that “clearly the early factory system did not shower its benefits evenly on all.” What relevant historical evidence can you find in this chapter or the previous ones that supports, modifies, or refutes this assertion? </title>
         <author>marcofarley10</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138992464</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This statement is very true. The factory system only benefited the factory owner and the workers. The workers got paid a small amount and the factory workers benefited off of their product.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-21 03:50:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/marcofarley10/kgfcrj18pts0/wish/138992464</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
