<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>P16 2026 - Parameswaran: From Classroom Engagement to Academic Integrity (large cohorts) by Laurine Hurley</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/laurine_hurley/k6yowb57fd7bhbdb</link>
      <description>Add your comments or questions here!</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2026-08-25 07:28:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-09-14 05:03:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Thank you — I agree that engaging students’ thinking is essential. I do wonder how this works in situations where student engagement is low. Some students expect to be taught in a more didactic way and then simply repeat that knowledge back through assessment. I find that there can be real resistance to dialogue because it feels risky. Students may worry that they do not know enough, and that speaking up will expose gaps in their understanding. Any suggestions from your work?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurine_hurley/k6yowb57fd7bhbdb/wish/4042959686</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2026-09-10 22:09:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurine_hurley/k6yowb57fd7bhbdb/wish/4042959686</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Authentic human dialogue</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurine_hurley/k6yowb57fd7bhbdb/wish/4043612509</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I liked the emphasis on authentic dialogue and how to get everyone somehow contributing and demonstrating learning in class, as part of a team, and as individuals. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2026-09-11 04:01:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurine_hurley/k6yowb57fd7bhbdb/wish/4043612509</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
