Deadline: 20:00, Sunday, 10/8/2025

Living Context:

Protagonist, Classmates, Teachers, Mom & Dad, Thief (Also classmates), Public School Kids

Nonliving Context:

Schools (Public & Private), Uniforms, Home, Library, GameStore

Bullying, Judgments, Pressure, Social Status,

Living Context: Mom, Dad, Manny [younger brother], Rowley [friend], Rodrick [older brother], Classmates, Teachers, Relatives, Heather Hills [ Girl friend]

Nonliving Context: House, School, Boardwalk, Hotel, Canteen

Pressure, bullying, hardship, adventures

Living | non living

Doctor Agasha, Conan and Ran house,

Conan, Conan' The buildings, Agasha

friends, Ran, house,...

Ran' friends,

Mori, The

police,...

Living context:

A.J, Ryan, Michael, Neil, Alexia, Andrea, teachers, other students, parents (mum and dad).

Non living context:

School, House, Cafeteria

Adventures, Judgments, Pressure

+Living things: some characters like Doraemon, Nobita, Shizuka,... ,some food like Dorayaki cakes, baked sweet potatoes and trees, flowers,...

+Non-living things: Doraemon's time machine to travel to past and future, some natural phenomena such as rain, snow, storm,...

-Metaphysical

+Living things: the ego of characters like Jaian is usually angry, Nobita is lazy and stupid, Shizuka is hard-working and gentle, Doraemon is kind,... The moralities in Doraemon are always help friend and polite, it's also Japanese culture. And about relation, the characters are good with each others like Doraemon helps and protects Nobita.

+Non-living things: abstract causality. For example is Nobita's bad future and existential like Doraemon gadgets.

Như Nguyệt: In Doremon, there are many gadgets that can allow a person to see the exact past occurences trhough either the Time Machine or the Past Mirror that just replay the past occurences. If Conan's world somehow manage to develop the same technologies like Doremon's, would there still be a need for a Detective like Conan since they can just recreate the past scenery or see it themselves wihout relying on collecting leffover clues from the killers? Would people still kill each other and hope to escape crime even in the face of such technologies? Would such technologies completely eliminate murder cases? Or would criminals develop more elaborate ways to bypass the technologies itself and somehow managed to hide from being caught better?

Minh An: The Wimpy Kid Greg Heffley shares many similarities with Nobita from Doremon — both tend to avoid responsibility, get into trouble, and dream of quick solutions to their problems. What if Greg also received help from Doremon’s gadgets? Would Greg use them to fix his social problems at school, or would he accidentally create bigger disasters? If Doremon gave him gadgets that could make him instantly popular, would Greg become a better person, or would he misuse them for selfish gains? If Greg’s classmates found out about the gadgets, would they try to take them from him, leading to even more chaos? Could Doremon’s help truly change Greg’s life for the better, or would Greg still remain the same person at heart? Would life at the private school become smoother, or would the gadgets make the student stand out too much and cause jealousy? If the gadgets made schoolwork effortless, would the character still value learning, or lose motivation entirely? Could Doremon’s help teach better lessons, or would it just make the student overly dependent on shortcuts?

Khánh Vy: In My Weird School Daze, strange and unpredictable events happen all the time, but they’re usually just harmless fun. What if a real detective like Conan had to investigate mysteries in that school? Would the constant weirdness make it harder for him to find the truth, or would it actually make him a better detective by forcing him to think outside the box? If an actual serious crime occurred in a place where pranks and absurd situations are normal, would the students and teachers even realize it was real, or would they mistake it for another joke? Could Conan’s sharp mind bring order to the school, or would the school’s chaos end up changing Conan instead?

Khải An: The Diary of a Private School Kid’s Ben Montgomery shares many similarities with Nobita from Doremon — both tend to avoid responsibility, get into trouble, and dream of quick solutions to their problems. What if Ben also received help from Doremon’s gadgets? Would Ben use them to fix his social problems at school, or would he accidentally create bigger disasters? If Doremon gave him gadgets that could make him instantly popular, would Ben become a better person, or would he misuse them for selfish gains? If Ben’s classmates found out about the gadgets, would they try to take them from him, leading to even more chaos? Could Doremon’s help truly change Ben’s life for the better, or would Ben still remain the same person at heart? Would life at the private school become smoother, or would the gadgets make the student stand out too much and cause jealousy? If the gadgets made schoolwork effortless, would the character still value learning, or lose motivation entirely? Could Doremon’s help teach better lessons, or would it just make the student overly dependent on shortcuts?

Hồng Quang: In My Weird School Daze, strange and unpredictable events happen all the time, but they’re usually just harmless fun. What if a real detective like Conan had to investigate mysteries in that school? Would the constant weirdness make it harder for him to find the truth, or would it actually make him a better detective by forcing him to think outside the box? If an actual serious crime occurred in a place where pranks and absurd situations are normal, would the students and teachers even realize it was real, or would they mistake it for another joke? Could Conan’s sharp mind bring order to the school, or would the school’s chaos end up changing Conan instead?

With the right gadgets, he could finally achieve the popularity he’s always dreamed of. But once that goal is reached, everyday responsibilities like homework would still be waiting for him. Again, Ben would turn to the gadgets—perhaps using one to handle his homework instantly, or another to solve his backpack troubles.

This easy way to just escape from his responsibilities could turn Ben into a full-blown gadget addict. On the other hand, there’s a chance he might eventually realize that life without challenges feels hollow, and that effort brings a satisfaction no gadget can replicate.

People still kill each other even know they can be arrested because someone believe in lucky or they ready to be arrested cause revenge or something like that.

Technologies can not completely eliminate murder cases because conflict between people or negative emotion still exist.

The killers can find some smarter ways to hide from being caught better, so there's a need for some detectives like Conan.

https://youtu.be/J7GY1Xg6X20?si=4dG4Zt9qIPT5PGNM

Doctor Who:

https://youtu.be/BJP9o4BEziI?si=WBoso5Ymss8aKzHA

Hank Green:

https://youtu.be/-a739VjqdSI?si=zwGhy7xP-_XkrEmB

Obama: 

https://youtu.be/ueMNqdB1QIE?si=fa0bm6jSH44f2sVb

Prince Ea: 

https://youtu.be/dqTTojTija8?si=vFmkIUXis3xUudwi

Trevor Noah:

https://youtu.be/QhMO5SSmiaA?si=xKp6jqaCwMEqMvyq

Robin Williams:

https://youtu.be/nFJexvoAblo?si=Ceo5qh9uUAmYOohE

Vinh Giang:

https://youtube.com/shorts/9qG9L3T7rhM?si=bfSegZ5zglnidr5j

Simon Sinek:

https://youtu.be/VOXrpW-rotE?si=Qjz9YRvm1vXlSCL3

Emma Watson: 

https://youtu.be/nIwU-9ZTTJc?si=LVMerL0-aE-jdkJw

Taylor swift:

https://youtu.be/wjSER73EAcU?si=OYbl-uvoAd5J4d5Y

Sawmise Gangee:

https://youtu.be/k6C8SX0mWP0?si=yvdH9kW29y6ix69Y

Martin Luther King:

https://youtu.be/I47Y6VHc3Ms?si=b17H4fVKx7rSVIHJ

5 additional speakers for day 10 of class:

Hồ Chí Minh

Mohamed Ali

Gandhi

Martin Luther King

Lenin

George Washington

Hank Green

1. Pace

• Hank speaks very fast compared to average speakers.

• His speed creates energy and excitement but still articulates clearly.

2. Volume & Intonation

• His volume goes from medium to high

• Intonation is dynamic —he uses sudden rises.

3. Vocabulary & Structure

• Vocabulary is academic when explaining concepts, but he simplifies it with everyday words and metaphors.

• informal and conversational

4. Appeal

I think he uses the appeal of logic and credibility

Martin Luther King

1.Pace

MLK begins with a m ensured, conversational pace, then increase the speed throughout the speech.

2. Volume & Intonation

• His voice is rich and resonant. He starts softly then climbs with emotion

3. Vocabulary & Structure

• MLK’s language is elevated, and poetic

4. Appeal

I think he uses a mix of emotions and logic

Prince Ea

1. Pace

He speaks with intention, deliberately has key phrases to attract listeners. For example, lines like, “I call school to the stand and accuse them…”, he pauses to let the weight of his words resonate .

2. Volume & Intonation

• Calm but thoughtful and assertive tone

3. Vocabulary & Structure

poetic style. He uses metaphors and vivid analogies

4. Appeal

He has a mix of appeal of emotion, logic and credibility

So, among these three speakers, I like Prince Ea style the most.

1.Pace

Simon speak very fast compared to normal speed.

His speed makes many air and energy but when he speaking, he still thinking wen he was speaking.

2.Volume and Intonation

His volume goes from low to high.

His intonation is very low but sometimes is high.

3.Vocabulary and structure

Simon use very easy words but some words are a little bit hard but when he speaks, he explain it to the the man next to him.

4.Appeal

I think he use emotions and logic.

Sawmise Gangee

1.Pace

The main character boy speaks a little bit slow.

His speed makes no energy and he still stop when he speaks.

2.Volume and intonation

His volume goes from medium to low.

His intonation is very low and very soft.

3.Vocabulary and structure

He speaks very easy words when he speaks.

4. Appeal

I think he use emotions and credibility.

Prince Ea

1.Pace

He speaks very fast to make everybody make sense.

2.Volume and intonation

His volume goes from medium to high.

His intonation sometimes low sometimes high.

3.Vocabulary and structure

He use a little bit hard words when he speaks.

4.Appeal

I think he use logic and credibility.

I like Prince Ea style the most.

He speaks calmly and powerfully. As the speech continues, his emotion intensifies, and the iconic phrase "I have a dream" creates a rhythmic beat, each one getting stronger and more impactful. He uses a slow style at the start and an aggressive style at the very end.

Robin Williams:

He speaks wisely and slowly, with an inspirational tone. At times he raises his voice for emphasis. His speech feels natural, with great use of pauses that add impact.

Simon Sinek:

His pacing is consistent with a moderate style, sometimes speeding up slightly for emphasis. He speaks very clearly, and his pauses and rhythm are fluid and also natural.

Simon Sinek is my favorite. He speaks clearly and naturally, with slight but effective changes in tone keeping the speech engaging!

He speaks slowly and clearly, but faster and louder when he wants to stress a point. His voice changes, soft in calm parts and strong in emotional parts. He uses simple words with both short and long sentences. His style is emotional with some logic and honesty, and I like it because it is inspiring.

Robin Williams:

His voice is calm, soft and natural, guiding with quiet warmth. He talks slowly, using simple words, mixing short and long sentences. Even when he shares big ideas like “words can change the world...” his tone stays steady and gentle. I like his speech style because it feels thoughtful, peaceful and quietly inspiring.

Emma Watson:

She speaks calmly and naturally, mixing short and longer sentences in a clear way. Speech is slow and steady, with pauses placed before important ideas like “gender equality” so listeners pay attention. She repeats key ideas like “I think it is right” to stress some important points. Her speech is honest, and quietly powerful.

I like Emma Watson style the most.

He speaks slowly and clearly, but faster and a little louder so everyone can hear him. He speaks honestly and emotionally strong in emotional parts. He uses simple words and he chooses the right words for the students to understand too.I really like how he speaks

2. Trevor Noah

   He speaks really fast but somehow the audience still understands him. He talks fast but people still under him because he explains it to them, also he uses hand gestures like moving his hands around or him moving around.

3. Hank Green

   He speaks very fast but still people understand him, he uses sudden emotion like he is using a normal voice and then suddenly uses a loud, rising voice. I really like how he speaks because its really inspiring to me.

In the 3 above, I like Prince Ea the most!

note: i sent it the other day but it wouldn’t send so now im sending it.

He speaks very fast and calm at first, but then became aggressive, faster and louder at the end

Doctor Who:

He speaks aggressively, fast and he paused a lot, later he speaks a little bit softer but still a little aggressive

Hank green:

Hank speaks faster than average speaker and calm and gentle, but he doesn't have much emotion and internation

Obama:

Obama speaks slowly clam and gentle and he paused a lot. He also has internation, but not much emotion

Prince Ea:

He speaks pretty fast, very calm and gentle. He has a lot of emotion and internation and paused by extending the words, so it feels like he never even stops

Trevor Noah:

Noah Speaks super-fast and doesn't pause much. He knows how to change his voice in to how an Indian would talk in English, and how he acts as the Britain talking aggressively when being joke by the Indian

Robin Williams:

Robin speaks slowly and he has a lot of emotion and internation. He is also calm and gentle

Vinh Giang:

He speaks fast, a lot of internation, but not much emotion. He also extends the words, so it feels like he never pauses

Simon Sinek:

Simon speaks softly, slow, calm and gentle. He also paused a lot, and he had a lot internation and emotion,

Emma Watson:

She speaks softly, calm, gentle and slow at first, she also uses many advanced words. But at the end, she became faster, louder and more emotion

Taylor Swith

She speaks slowly, soft, calm and gentle, she also has a lot of internation and emotion

Sawmise Gangee

He speaks slow, sad, and calm, he also has a lot of internation and emotion

Martin Luther King

He speaks calm and loud at first, but when it comes to the scene he says about his dream, he became aggressive, he speaks louder and have more emotion and internation, he also paused a lot

Answer: yes, craft can make you creative.

Upgrade

Answer: Sure, craft can make you innovative

2: Do you think war should end

Answer: Yes, war should end so people could live in happiness

Upgrade

Answer: yes, warfare should end, so community could live in laughter

Doctor Who: He speaks fast and smooth, his voice is medium.

Obama: He speaks a little bit slow and stop a lot of time. He also speaks a little bit loud.

Prince Ea: He speaks a little bit fast and calm. He speaks like he skim.

Trevor Noah: He speaks fast like we can't hear anything and doesn't stop much. His voice go up and down a few moments.

Robin William: He speaks calm and use emotion very much.

Vinh Giang: He speaks very fast and he doesn't stop much.

Simon Sinek: He speaks softly and fast. He stop very much.

Emma Watson: She speaks soft and slow at first and then she speaks faster then first. End, she has more emotion.

Taylor Swift: She speaks slowly and soft, she also has a lot of emotion.

Samwise Gangee: He speaks slowly and soft. He speaks like he doesn't has more energy to talk.

Martin Luther King: He speaks loud and noisy, he use many emotion and a big voice. He also stop a lot of times.

He speaks quite quickly but with clear pauses. At the start, his voice is soft, becomes strong and powerful at the end. He appeals mainly to emotion.

Doctor Who:

He speaks fast and dramatic. His voice goes up and down. He appeals to emotions and also credibility as a leader.

Hank Green:

He speaks very fast, but his voice stays steady. He use a lot of simple words. He appeals mainly to logic.

Obama:

He speaks slowly and smoothly. He stresses his voice clearly when he talks about important ideas. He appeals to logic, credibility, and sometimes emotions.

Trevor Noah:

He speaks fast and funny. He stresses his voice clearly on important ideas and with pauses. He appeals to emotions, especially funny.

Vinh Giang:

He speaks fast and smooth. His voice is clear and strong on important ideas. He appeals to credibility and emotions.

Simon Sinek:

He speaks fast but with clear pauses. He stresses his voice on important ideas so the ideas stand out. He appeals to logic and credibility.

Taylor Swift:

She speaks naturally and gently. She uses simple, friendly words. She appeals mainly to emotions.

Sawmise Gangee:

He speaks with a moderate speed and calm voice. He stresses his voice clearly when sharing some important ideas. He appeals to both logic and emotions.

Martin Luther King:

He speaks slowly. He stresses his voice clearly, and his voice becomes more powerful ất the end. He appeals to emotions and credibility.

-Yes, friends are important because they give us support and happiness.

=>Yes, friends are significant because they give us backing and exhilaration.

2. Do you think music can make people feel better?

-Yes, I think music can make people feel better because it makes us relaxed, brings us joy and helps us forget stress.

=>Sure, i think music can make people feel better because it make us comfortable, bring us happiness and help us forget stress.

3.Do you think we should protect the environment more?
-Yes, I think we should protect the environment more because it keeps the air clean, saves animals, and makes the world a better place to live.

=>Sure, I think we should preserve the environment more because it keeps the atmosphere clean, saves animals, and makes the world a better place to live.

He switches between gentle and moderate at first, and at the very end, he speeds up and gets more aggressive with more pathos (emotions).

Doctor Who:

Pretty aggressive at the start, he sounds like a mad scientist with a lot of emphasis at the end. He got really, really angry and aggressive, speeding up with more emotions.

Hank Green:

I watched him a lot for studies and especially for history classes, he is a great speaker; he speaks really clearly and with a moderate-fast style. His pausing is really good. and his speech stays consistent throughout the speech

Obama:

He speaks with a strong and stable voice, like a leader. He has a lot of pauses but for good reasons. he speaks in a slow style, sometimes getting a bit more aggressive, with not a lot of change in pitch.

Prince Ea:

The choices of words are like those in a poem, where the words rhyme with each other, and there is a lot of variation in pitch and emphasis. He normally pauses at the point where he wants to emphasize something.

Trevor Noah:

He speaks very fast, sometimes speaking it slowly and then speeding it up. The switches of accent make the speech sound comedic.

Robin Williams:

Speaks with a lot of emotion, the speech sounds mystical and adventurous, switching between slow and moderate, with great flow.

Vinh Giang:

He switches between fast and moderate, and gets slow every time he wants to pinpoint something.

Simon Sinek:

He speaks with a moderate style, very consistent throughout the speech, and he sounds very clear. Sometimes he speeds up a little before dropping back down to moderate.

Emma Watson:

She speaks slowly, and her voice sounds very persuasive. She has a lot of pauses for emphasis. Her speech sounds very powerful without a strong voice.

Taylor Swift:

She speaks slowly, with a lot of good pauses. She sounds very clear and smooth.

Sawmise Gangee:

He speaks slowly with lots of emotion, making us feel sadness and sympathy.

Martin Luther King:

He speaks with a strong and powerful voice, sometimes getting aggressive at the end for emphasis.

Sorry for the late submission, I've been swamped this week. I did say alot of emphasis, did I?

Doctor Who:

He speaks very fast and stopped so people can understand what he is saying, he also speaks very softly afterwards.

Hank green:

He speaks very fast and his voice slowly becomes stronger and more aggressive.

Obama:

Obama speaks very calmly and fascinating. He pauses at important parts and makes sure everyone is listening.

Prince Ea:

He speaks faster than an average person so that is amazing. He also has very good speaking !

Trevor Noah:

2. He speaks really fast but somehow the audience still understands him. He talks fast but people still under him because he explains it to them, also he uses hand gestures like moving his hands around or him moving around.

Robin Williams:

Robin speaks slowly and he is very calm and gentle to thr audience.

Vinh Giang:

When he speaks, its like he wants to say something important and he speaks very well.

Simon Sinek:

Simon speaks softly, slow, calm and gentle. He makes sure the audience understand him

Emma Watson:

She speaks very calmly and seriously. At first, she was very calm, talks slow and gentle. At main parts, she shows emotions .

Taylor Swith

She speaks slowly, soft, calm and gentle, she also has a lot of emotion.

Sawmise Gangee

He speaks slowly, making sure everyone understood and also in a sad voice.

Martin Luther King

He speaks calm and loud at first, but when he started talking about something important, he suddenly becomes aggressive, telling everyone that its super important

Samwise Gangee: He talks about how the life was bad. What problem he has in the bad world. He pause very much, he speaks softly and being like he was nearly to die.

Martin Luther King: He speaks very noisy and loudly. He pause very much and his volume is very strong.

This video features the famous final speech from Charlie Chaplin’s 1940 film The Great Dictator. In this powerful monologue, Chaplin, playing a humble barber mistaken for a dictator, delivers a heartfelt plea for peace, unity, and humanity.

He condemns dictatorship, greed, and hatred, and instead promotes values like kindness, compassion, and freedom. He warns against the misuse of technology and power, urging people not to become machines, but to hold on to their humanity.

The speech ends with a call for hope and change, reminding us that the power lies in the hands of the people to build a better, more just world.

                           Content Doctor Who

Doctor Who: Rose is the first episode of the 2005 series reboot. It introduces Rose Tyler, a young woman from London, who encounters strange plastic mannequins that come to life. She is saved by the mysterious Doctor, who reveals an alien threat called the Nestene Consciousness aiming to invade Earth. Rose decides to join the Doctor on his adventures through time and space. This episode marks a fresh start for Doctor Who with modern storytelling and strong characters.

                          Content Prince Ea

Prince Ea’s video "I Just Sued the School System" criticizes the outdated education system. He compares it to a courtroom trial, where the school system is the defendant. He argues that education hasn't changed much in over 150 years, while technology and the world around us have evolved rapidly. He highlights that the system forces students into one-size-fits-all learning, stifling creativity and individuality. Using Albert Einstein’s famous quote about judging a fish by its ability to climb a tree, Prince Ea emphasizes the need for education reform to nurture diverse talents and creativity. The video calls for a new approach to teaching that respects each student’s unique abilities.

2 Trevor Noah: Trevor speaks about how the Britain took over India and colonies them. He changes voice from Indian to Britain and how he makes people laugh

3 Simon Sinek: Simon speaks about how friendship work and how to make friends believe you. He speak slowly and has a lot of emotion

He talks about how schools treat students badly, he also said that the classes from 150 years ago is the same as the present. And they are now planning us for the future.

Trevor Noah :

He talks about how the British people took over India and switches accents really fast.

Emma Watson:

She talks about gender equality, and she says that women and men should have equal rights and opportunities.

1 Obama

        Obama's 2004 speech is a prime example of effective political oratory: it skillfully combines personal storytelling, shared values, clear contrasts with division, and a powerful call to hope. It marked a turning point in Obama's career — not only solidifying his standing within the Democratic Party but also establishing his broad public influence.

2 Prince Ea

        Prince EA, with “I Sued the School System”, delivers a powerful call to action: we need to change the education system so that it serves the students — their creativity, individuality, and full potential — rather than simply repeating an outdated, factory-like, mechanical model. His message is highly valuable, especially in a world where society and technology are evolving rapidly.

3 Hank green

       Hank Green presents utilitarianism as an ethical theory based on maximizing happiness for the majority, while also highlighting debates around fairness and individual rights through vivid, clear, and engaging examples.

4 Doctor Who

          The Doctor’s speech in The Zygon Inversion is a prime example of powerful and effective communication. It not only expresses the character’s personal perspective but also conveys a profound message about peace and humanity. This moment stands as one of the most memorable in Doctor Who, demonstrating the power of words to change the world.

5 Emma Waston

      Emma Watson's speech at the UN was a compelling call to action that effectively communicated the importance of gender equality and the need for collective involvement. Her strategic use of language, inclusive approach, and emphasis on shared responsibility resonated with a global audience, making a significant impact on the HeForShe campaign and the broader movement for gender equality.

6 Robin Willams

       The video "Experience Life – Robin Williams Motivation" is an inspiring message that calls on people to live fully, embrace every moment, and not let fear or worry stop them from experiencing life.

Robin Williams delivers this message with a sincere voice and deep emotion, combined with powerful visuals and music, awakening the audience and urging them to take action.

7 Martin luther king

      Martin Luther King Jr. did not merely convey information — he inspired, provided moral direction, and awakened the conscience of an entire nation. His emotionally powerful delivery, use of repetition, vivid symbolism, and the balance between reason and heart turned this speech into a symbol of the American civil rights movement.

This speech was not just “a speech” — it was a historic call to awakening, aiming for a more just and humane society, not only for Black Americans but for all people.

8 Sawmise Gangee

        Sam acknowledges that the current situation is very difficult and seems unfair, but he emphasizes that darkness is only temporary and the light will return. Great stories matter because they teach us to hold on to faith in the good, even when it seems small. Ultimately, Sam affirms that there is still good in this world, and it is worth fighting for and never giving up.

9 Taylor Swift

      Taylor Swift's commencement speech at New York University is a testament to her powerful ability to inspire. With a sincere communication style, the use of strong language, and vivid metaphors, she conveyed profound messages about confidence, courage, and the importance of never being ashamed to try. Her message is not only for the graduating students but also serves as a reminder to all of us about the value of continuous learning and personal growth.

10 Trevor Noah

        Trevor Noah is not only a talented comedian but also someone with a profound and effective ability to communicate. Through this talk, he conveys an important message that communication is not just about speaking but also about the ability to connect and understand one another. This is a valuable lesson for anyone who wants to improve their communication skills.

He pause a lot of time when he speaks.

He use credibility to present for their parents.

Sawmise Gangee: He talk about how world is good. What does he do in the past, what he has through,... He pause very much when he speaks about what he through.

He use emotion to present with himself.

Doctor Who: He talk about war, what you will do you feel when you kill someone. He pause a little bit and he scream very much. He use emotion and logical to present for the troublemaker.

Doctor who: He talks about war, what will you feel when you kill someone. He screams o lot and has emotions

Hank Green: He speaks about utilitarianism, what will you feel when you kill one person and twenty were saved. He speaks very fast and has o lot of emotions

Obama: he speaks about how he was born, how he grew up and became president. He speaks gently, calm and slow.

Prince Ea: He talks about how school is treating student badly and test should be band. He speaks very fast, calm and very gentle. He speaks so fast it's like he singing.

Trevor Noah: He talks about how the British took over India. He speaks very fast, and he can change voices from India to British which is pretty funny.

Robin Williams: He talks about how life worked, how you feel when you lost someone you love more than yourself. He speaks slowly, calm and sadly

Vinh Giang: Vinh talks about rehearse work. The more you rehearse, the more you get better at speaking. He speaks fast, calm and gentle

Simon Sinek: He speaks about how friendship work and how to make a friend believe you. He speaks slowly, calm and gentle.

Emma Watson: Emma talks about the difference between men and women, how women are treated. She speaks slowly, calm and uses complex words.

Taylor Swith: She talks about her new song and how she became a famous singer. She speaks slowly, calm and gentle

Samwise Gangee: He talks about life, how sometimes it is bad, but sometimes it is good. He speaks slowly, emotional and he sounded like he was about to died.

Martin Luther King: Martin speaks about racism, how white people treated black people badly, he also talks about his dream. He speaks loudly, aggressive and slow.

He use credibility and emotions to speaks.

Hank Green: He talks about utilitarianism.

He speaks very fast and he use logical and emotions to speaks.

Obama: He talks about what has he through the life, how he grew up. He speaks a little bit slow. He use credibility to speaks.

Robin Williams: He talks about how life works, what is your emotions when you miss something very important for you.

He speaks a little bit slow.

He use logical and credibility to speaks.

Simon Sinek: He talks about how to make friendship and how to make something or people believe you. He speaks very fast and he use logical to speaks.

Taylor Swift: She talks about her new song and how her being a very good and famous singer. She speaks a little bit slow and she use credibility to speaks.

Martin Luther King: He speaks about racism and his very big and good dream.

He speaks very loud and strong.

He use credibility to speaks.

Charlie Chaplin urges humanity to rise above greed, hate, and dictatorship, embracing liberty, compassion, and unity so that science and progress serve peace and the common good.

Doctor Who:

The Doctor warns that war only creates a cycle of endless suffering and revenge, with no true winners. He tells her to think about what comes after the fighting, pointing out that violence just repeats itself. Instead, he pleads for peace, mercy, and negotiation, saying that real strength is choosing forgiveness over destruction.

Hank Green:

He talks about how utilitarianism is the moral theory that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It comes in two main forms: act utilitarianism, which judges each action by its outcomes, and rule utilitarianism, which follows rules that generally maximize well-being. While powerful and simple, it faces challenges related to justice, rights, and the sacrifice of individuals for the greater good

Obama:

His speech emphasized unity over division, declaring there is no liberal or conservative America, only the United States of America. He called for a politics of hope rooted in shared responsibility and opportunity, which inspired national attention and launched his rise to prominence.

Prince Ea:

He argues that traditional education is outdated, restricts creativity, and treats students uniformly instead of nurturing individuality. He calls for reform toward systems that inspire critical thinking, creativity, and real-world learning.

Trevor Noah:

He humorously critiques British colonization of India by acting out how absurd it was. Britain arrived, declaring the land theirs and forcing locals to adopt foreign gods and customs. Through satire, he highlights the arrogance and illogic of imposing one culture’s power and identity on another.

Robin Williams:

he reflects on life’s preciousness, reminding us that we’re given only a short time, so we should seize the moment and truly live it, finding our own voice.

Vinh Giang:

He talks about how rehearsing makes your speech sound better, and reduces sounding scripted, it helps you with the flow and the pauses that make your speech sound natural

Simon Sinek:

He explains that leadership is not innate but learned through practice, empathy, and responsibility. True leaders support others, listen, and take accountability rather than relying on authority or titles

Emma Watson:

She calls on men and women to work together to end gender inequality. She highlights how feminism is about equal rights, not against men, and urges everyone to act so that both genders can live free of stereotypes and discrimination

Taylor Swift:

Taylor Swift tells graduates not to fear failure or trying, emphasizing resilience, self-belief, and growth through mistakes. She encourages embracing change and pursuing dreams with courage

Samwise Gangee:

His speech reminds the kid that even in darkness, stories of hope and perseverance matter because they show that people keep fighting for good, and that there’s still light worth holding onto.

Martin Luther King:

King envisions a future of racial equality, freedom, and justice, where people are judged by character, not color. He calls for unity, nonviolence, and hope in the fight for civil rights.

1 Obama

        Obama's 2004 speech is a prime example of effective political oratory: it skillfully combines personal storytelling, shared values, clear contrasts with division, and a powerful call to hope. It marked a turning point in Obama's career — not only solidifying his standing within the Democratic Party but also establishing his broad public influence.

2 Prince Ea

        Prince EA, with “I Sued the School System”, delivers a powerful call to action: we need to change the education system so that it serves the students — their creativity, individuality, and full potential — rather than simply repeating an outdated, factory-like, mechanical model. His message is highly valuable, especially in a world where society and technology are evolving rapidly.

3 Hank green

       Hank Green presents utilitarianism as an ethical theory based on maximizing happiness for the majority, while also highlighting debates around fairness and individual rights through vivid, clear, and engaging examples.

4 Doctor Who

          The Doctor’s speech in The Zygon Inversion is a prime example of powerful and effective communication. It not only expresses the character’s personal perspective but also conveys a profound message about peace and humanity. This moment stands as one of the most memorable in Doctor Who, demonstrating the power of words to change the world.

5 Emma Waston

      Emma Watson's speech at the UN was a compelling call to action that effectively communicated the importance of gender equality and the need for collective involvement. Her strategic use of language, inclusive approach, and emphasis on shared responsibility resonated with a global audience, making a significant impact on the HeForShe campaign and the broader movement for gender equality.

6 Robin Willams

       The video "Experience Life – Robin Williams Motivation" is an inspiring message that calls on people to live fully, embrace every moment, and not let fear or worry stop them from experiencing life.

Robin Williams delivers this message with a sincere voice and deep emotion, combined with powerful visuals and music, awakening the audience and urging them to take action.

7 Martin luther king

      Martin Luther King Jr. did not merely convey information — he inspired, provided moral direction, and awakened the conscience of an entire nation. His emotionally powerful delivery, use of repetition, vivid symbolism, and the balance between reason and heart turned this speech into a symbol of the American civil rights movement.

This speech was not just “a speech” — it was a historic call to awakening, aiming for a more just and humane society, not only for Black Americans but for all people.

8 Sawmise Gangee

        Sam acknowledges that the current situation is very difficult and seems unfair, but he emphasizes that darkness is only temporary and the light will return. Great stories matter because they teach us to hold on to faith in the good, even when it seems small. Ultimately, Sam affirms that there is still good in this world, and it is worth fighting for and never giving up.

9 Taylor Swift

      Taylor Swift's commencement speech at New York University is a testament to her powerful ability to inspire. With a sincere communication style, the use of strong language, and vivid metaphors, she conveyed profound messages about confidence, courage, and the importance of never being ashamed to try. Her message is not only for the graduating students but also serves as a reminder to all of us about the value of continuous learning and personal growth.

10 Trevor Noah

        Trevor Noah is not only a talented comedian but also someone with a profound and effective ability to communicate. Through this talk, he conveys an important message that communication is not just about speaking but also about the ability to connect and understand one another. This is a valuable lesson for anyone who wants to improve their communication skills.

First, equal access protects human rights. If resurrection exists but only the rich or powerful can afford it, society will become even more unfair. Just like vaccines or life-saving medicines, the ability to come back to life must be available to all, regardless of wealth or status.

Second, resurrection could reduce grief and preserve valuable knowledge. Families would no longer lose loved ones forever. Communities could continue benefiting from the wisdom of great leaders, scientists, or artists who died unexpectedly. Imagine if Einstein, Marie Curie, or other innovators could have been revived to continue their work.

Third, open access prevents abuse and conflict. If resurrection technology stays secret or restricted, it could lead to social unrest, black markets, or dangerous power imbalances. By making it universal, we ensure transparency and fairness.

In short, if we have the power to defeat death, it should not be a privilege. It should be a right. Resurrection, like education or healthcare, must be shared with all of humanity so that everyone has an equal chance at life, hope, and progress.

from chat

Life is for living things like animals and people so when the something die that things gonna be resurrection because the resurrection is accessible.

This is because every human being has equal value, so any opportunity related to life should be shared fairly. Resurrection is the greatest opportunity, it’s the chance to continue living; therefore, it cannot be limited.

For example, just like the right to breathe the clean air or the right to education, resurrection should also be a right for everyone.

2. Universal resurrection can maximize human potential

When everybody has the chance to come back to life, society can preserve knowledge, experiences, and talents from all walks of life. Not only genuine matter, ordinary people also contribute to the progress of humanity.

Take a devoted teacher or a local artist as an example, they can also have long-lasting values and resurrection allows them to keep contributing.

3. Resurrection promotes collective harmony and hope

If people know that they and their loved ones have a chance to live again, society will experience less suffering and despair, and become more united. It brings hope and motivation for humanity to build a better future together.

If resurrection happened, families would no longer fear permanent loss, and communities would lean toward cooperation instead of harsh competitions.

       For this question I think agree because

Reason 1: Every human being has the right to equal access to life

If resurrection were a real technology or method, limiting it to only certain groups (the wealthy or powerful) would be a violation of human rights.

Example: In a future society, if only the rich can be resurrected, the gap between rich and poor would not only be economic but also biological injustice — the poor die once, while the rich get to live forever.

Reason 2: Resurrection can correct mistakes or unjust deaths

Many people die due to accidents, wars, diseases, or wrongful convictions. Resurrecting them would be a fair way to restore what they rightfully deserve.

Example: A young scientist dies in an accident while their research is still incomplete. Resurrection would allow them to continue contributing to humanity.

Reason 3: Resurrection benefits society by bringing back talented individuals

People with knowledge, skills, or significant contributions (such as doctors, scientists, or artists) could continue to create value for humanity if brought back to life.

Example: If Albert Einstein, Marie Curie, or Steve Jobs could be resurrected, they might continue innovating in science or technology.

Making resurrection equal for all would also bring hope and comfort. Families would not lose loved ones unfairly, and people would feel that society truly cares about everyone, not just a few. Of course, there might be challenges like population or resources, but those problems can be solved. What cannot be accepted is a world where only some lives are valued more than others.

That’s why resurrection, if it exists, should be a right for everyone, not a privilege for a few.

Truth, at its most basic level, is the quality or state of being in accordance with fact or reality. It is what has happened, what is happening, or the authentic nature of a thing, event, or concept. However, in philosophy, ethics, and daily life, the definition and perception of truth are immensely diverse, ranging from objective truth, subjective truth, to absolute truth."

Answer the 5 question

1 How important is the truth?

         Truth is of fundamental and essential importance to both individuals and society."

Example ·  Building Trust (Xây dựng niềm tin): Truth is the foundation for trust and relationships between people. Without truth, there can be no trust, and an effectively functioning society cannot be maintained.

Decision-Making (Ra quyết định): We need the truth (accurate information) to make rational decisions, from personal matters (where to invest, whom to trust) to social decisions (creating policy, laws).

Ethics and Justice (Đạo đức và công lý): Truth is a core element in the legal system and social justice. Justice can only be executed when the truth is brought to light.

Knowledge and Progress (Kiến thức và tiến bộ): Science, medicine, and all forms of intellectual progress are based on seeking, verifying, and accepting the truth

    2  What are some cases that truth can hurt people?

             Truth, although being the nature of reality, can sometimes bring pain, psychological harm, or even danger:

    Example Serious Medical Diagnosis: Knowing the truth about a life-threatening illness can cause shock, depression, and despair for the patient and their family.

Truth in Relationships: Discovering betrayal or deception in love, marriage, or friendship can destroy trust and cause deep suffering.

Cruel Truths: When a person has to face an unchangeable truth about a tragedy (e.g., the sudden death of a loved one) or a painful past (e.g., the truth about their origins or family), this can cause psychological trauma.

State or Personal Secrets: Publicly disclosing a sensitive truth can endanger the life, career, or security of an individual or a group. (Example: The truth about secret government operations or the private life of a celebrity)."

 3    Can truth prevent freedom ?

"If 'freedom' means irresponsibility or living in delusion: Yes, the truth will prevent that. The truth about the consequences of actions (cause and effect) or the truth about one's limitations will restrict the 'freedom' to do anything without accountability. Example: The truth that if I break the law I will be penalized prevents me from being 'free' to steal

If 'freedom' means liberation and autonomy: No, the truth does not prevent it; rather, it paves the way for it. Philosophers often say, 'The truth shall set you free.'

Cognitive Freedom: Only by knowing the truth about the world can you make informed, sound choices, instead of acting based on fear, ignorance, or deception.

Freedom from Deception: The truth helps you escape the manipulation and control of others."

  4   What are the cases where you have to give up truth for fairness?

     "Typically, truth and fairness (justice) go hand-in-hand: fairness must be based on truth. However, in certain specific situations, the pursuit of absolute truth can conflict with the principle of humanity or procedural justice."

    Example "Exclusionary Rule (Legal): In legal systems, if evidence is factual (e.g., a confession) but was obtained illegally (e.g., through torture), that evidence can be excluded to protect the defendant's basic rights. In this case, the system gives up a 'hard' truth (the confession) to protect procedural justice (the right to legal treatment).

'White Lies' for Compassion: Sometimes, a truth can cause great harm without yielding any benefit, while a small 'lie' protects a person's emotions or dignity. Example: Telling a dying person they look well so they can pass away peacefully. This is a sacrifice of truth to achieve a kind of emotional or humanitarian 'fairness.'

Protecting the Vulnerable (Social Justice): Occasionally, the truth about a person (e.g., a minor past mistake) might be concealed or downplayed in a social context to ensure they have a fair chance to reintegrate and are not destroyed by social prejudice."

  5 How can truth make a person happy?

While confronting the truth can sometimes be painful at first, in the long run, living with and speaking the truth provides a solid foundation for genuine happiness and peace of mind."

    Example 1. Brings Peace and Reduces Stress

 in truth (without the need to hide, lie, or fabricate things) significantly helps to reduce stress and anxiety. Maintaining a secret or upholding a lie requires energy and creates enormous psychological pressure, which increases stress hormones. When you are honest with yourself and others, you feel comfortable, relieved, and at peace from within, no longer fearing exposure."

2. Builds Integrity and Self-Worth

Truth helps you build an upright and whole character (integrity). When your words, thoughts, and actions are consistent, you feel greater self-respect and self-confidence. Living in alignment with your True Self, without having to pretend to be someone else, is one of the most crucial elements for long-lasting happiness.

3. Strengthens Quality Relationships

Trust is the foundation of every healthy relationship (friends, family, romantic partners). When you are a reliable and honest person, you attract relationships that are genuine and deep. These relationships provide emotional support and a sense of authentic connection, making them an essential source of happiness.

4. Paves the Way for Healing and Personal Growth

Facing the truth (no matter how difficult) is the essential first step toward healing a wound, a problem, or a mistake. Only with a clear awareness of reality (including your own flaws) can you begin the process of change and development. This growth and improvement is, in itself, the source of happiness and fulfillment.

💔 1. Personal truths that hurt feelings

When someone tells a harsh or insensitive truth — for example:

• Telling a friend they look bad or failed badly.

• Revealing a painful secret about someone’s past.
  Even if it’s true, it can hurt their self-esteem or damage the friendship.

🕵️ 2. Truths that expose betrayal

Learning the truth about betrayal — such as cheating, lies, or dishonesty — can deeply wound people emotionally.

Example: A person finding out their partner was unfaithful or their friend was pretending to care.

⚖️ 3. Harsh truths in justice or history

Sometimes truth about past actions (like war crimes, corruption, or family secrets) can shock or divide people.

Example: Discovering a hero in history committed crimes; this truth is painful but necessary for justice.

🏥 4. Medical or life truths

Hearing the truth about a serious illness, disability, or death can cause grief and fear.

Example: A doctor telling a patient that their disease is incurable.

💼 5. Workplace or social truths

Telling the truth about someone’s poor performance, mistakes, or weaknesses can hurt their reputation or career — even if it’s true.

🧠 6. Self-truths

Sometimes the hardest truths are the ones we face about ourselves — our flaws, regrets, or failures. Accepting them can hurt, but it’s the first step toward growth.

🌱 1. Truth builds trust

Without truth, relationships—whether personal, social, or political—cannot last.
If people or governments lie, trust breaks down, and cooperation becomes impossible.

Example: In science, medicine, or business, truth and honesty are essential so people can rely on results, laws, and agreements.

⚖️ 2. Truth supports justice

Fair decisions depend on knowing what really happened.
If truth is hidden or distorted, justice becomes impossible.

Example: In court, finding the truth about a crime is the only way to deliver fair punishment or protect the innocent.

💡 3. Truth enables learning and progress

Every field of knowledge—science, history, philosophy—depends on truth.
If we accept falsehoods, progress stops, and mistakes repeat.

Example: Medical research must be true and accurate; otherwise, lives can be lost.

❤️ 4. Truth gives life meaning and integrity

Living truthfully means being authentic and honest about who you are.
People who ignore truth may gain comfort or power temporarily—but they lose integrity.

“You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” — John 8:32

⚠️ 5. Truth can be difficult—but necessary

Sometimes truth hurts or challenges beliefs.
Yet facing uncomfortable truths is what allows people and societies to grow stronger.

When people learn the truth about a dishonest or cruel ruler, they may rebel.

Example: In history, many empires collapsed when the truth about their leaders’ greed or cruelty became known — like when the truth about the French monarchy’s luxury led to the French Revolution.

⚖️ 2. Truth breaks fear and control

Some kingdoms keep power by spreading lies and controlling information.
When the truth comes out, people stop being afraid and start demanding freedom.

Example: The truth about government lies or propaganda has caused revolutions and reforms in many countries.

🧠 3. Truth prevents blind loyalty

When citizens know the truth, they think critically instead of obeying blindly.
That can weaken a ruler’s absolute power — but it also creates a stronger, fairer society in the long run.

💔 4. But truth can also cause chaos

If the truth is revealed suddenly or without wisdom, it can destroy trust and unity too quickly.

Example: A shocking truth about a leader or religion can make people lose faith and stability.

💡 Conclusion

Truth can prevent or destroy a kingdom built on lies, but it can also save and protect a kingdom that values honesty, justice, and wisdom.
So truth is powerful — it can either break or build a kingdom, depending on how it’s used.

Truth is very important.
It helps people trust each other, solve problems, and live honest lives.
Without truth, things fall apart — friendships, families, even whole societies.

But telling the truth isn’t always easy.
Sometimes, the truth can hurt.
Sometimes, it can even make life harder in the short term.

Still — truth is what helps us grow, heal, and be real with each other.

🔵 When Can Truth Hurt People?

Truth can hurt in many situations. For example:

1. In Relationships

• If someone cheats or lies, the truth can break a heart.

2. Family Secrets

• Finding out you're adopted or that your parents lied about something big.

3. Health Problems

• Hearing you or someone you love is very sick.

4. Painful Past Events

• Learning bad things happened in your country or family history.

Even if it hurts, the truth can help people understand and eventually heal.

🟣 Can Truth Take Away Freedom?

Sometimes, yes — at least at first.

1. Social Problems

• If you tell the truth and others don’t like it, you might lose friends or be judged.

2. Political or Legal Trouble

• In some countries, telling the truth can get people arrested (like reporters or whistleblowers).

3. Personal Truths

• Admitting something hard about yourself (like a mental health issue or identity) might feel scary, or limit what others expect from you.

So yes — truth can feel like it takes away freedom.
But in the long run, truth usually leads to real freedom — the kind that comes from being honest and living as your true self.

p.s: Sorry for submitting late! I was busy reviewing for some of my tests

⚖️ 1. Protecting someone from unfair harm

Sometimes telling the truth could cause unfair suffering to an innocent person.

Example: A teacher knows a student made a small mistake but doesn’t report it because revealing it would destroy the student’s future unfairly compared to the mistake’s size.
→ The teacher gives up full truth for fairness and compassion.

💬 2. When truth causes unequal treatment

If truth is used in a way that increases inequality, silence may protect fairness.

Example: Revealing someone’s poor background or personal secret might be true, but it could lead others to judge them unfairly.

🧠 3. In legal systems (protecting privacy or safety)

Sometimes courts keep certain truths confidential to ensure fairness in judgment.

Example: Protecting the identity of a witness or a victim.
The truth of who they are is hidden, but fairness (justice and safety) is protected.

❤️ 4. When truth causes unnecessary pain

There are times when telling the truth brings no benefit, only harm — so silence or a “softened” truth may be fairer.

Example: A doctor might give hope to a dying patient rather than reveal the harsh truth all at once.

🕊️ 5. In diplomacy or peacebuilding

Sometimes revealing the full truth about past actions or mistakes could restart conflict.
Leaders may choose forgiveness or compromise — giving up full truth to achieve peace and fairness for the future.

🌞 1. Truth gives peace of mind

When you live honestly — with yourself and others — you don’t have to hide or pretend.

You feel free, confident, and peaceful because your life is real, not a lie.
→ Example: Admitting a mistake or a secret can bring relief and emotional freedom.

💡 2. Truth helps you understand yourself

Knowing who you really are — your strengths, weaknesses, and values — is the start of true happiness.

When you face the truth about yourself, you can grow and make better choices.

🤝 3. Truth builds trust and strong relationships

Honesty brings deeper, more meaningful connections.

Friends or partners who are truthful with each other feel safer and happier together.

🌱 4. Truth can hurt first, but heal later

Sometimes the truth is painful — but it helps people heal, change, or find real happiness.

Example: Learning a hard truth about someone’s betrayal hurts, but it frees you to move on and find peace.

⚖️ 5. Truth prevents guilt and regret

Living in lies causes stress and fear of being exposed.
Telling the truth may be hard, but it removes guilt and allows real joy to grow.

2) Sentence 1 high melody: I emphasize protecting, we, planting trees, by saving, together

Sentence 2 low melody: I emphasize shares, waste, plastic, difference, life, living beings

1. High energy consumption:
   Training large AI models (like GPT or image generators) requires massive computing power, often using data centers that consume a lot of electricity.
   → For example, training GPT-3 is estimated to have used hundreds of megawatt-hours of electricity.

2. Carbon emissions:
   If that electricity comes from non-renewable sources (such as coal, oil, or gas), it produces a large amount of CO₂ emissions, which contribute to climate change.

3. Electronic waste:
   AI depends on powerful hardware such as GPUs and servers. These devices need to be replaced frequently, creating electronic waste and consuming rare materials like lithium and cobalt.

4. Water consumption:
   Data centers often require a lot of water for cooling, especially in dry regions, which puts extra pressure on local water supplies.

Possible counterarguments

• Efficiency improvements:
  AI companies are working on energy-efficient chips and greener data centers. For example, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI are investing in renewable energy to reduce their carbon footprint.

• Positive environmental applications:
  AI can also be used to optimize energy grids, monitor deforestation, predict climate change, and reduce waste, which can help offset some of its environmental impact.

AI should be used because it can help protect the environment and promote sustainability. Artificial intelligence can analyze large amounts of data to predict climate patterns, monitor pollution, and detect deforestation more quickly and accurately than humans. It also helps industries become more energy-efficient by optimizing production processes, reducing waste, and cutting down on carbon emissions. For example, AI systems can manage smart grids to balance electricity use and reduce energy loss. In agriculture, AI can suggest the best time to plant and water crops, saving both water and resources. By supporting cleaner technologies and improving environmental management, AI plays an important role in building a greener and more sustainable future for the planet.

Here are the main arguments for why AI should not be used without careful consideration regarding its environmental impact:

⚡️ Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint

• Massive Electricity Demand: Training and deploying large, complex AI models (especially Generative AI like GPT-4) requires enormous amounts of computational power, housed in data centers. This translates to substantial electricity consumption.

  • The electricity consumption of data centers globally is rising sharply, and in many regions, this power still comes from fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas), leading to increased $\text{CO}_2$ emissions.

  • Some estimates suggest that a single $\text{ChatGPT}$ query can consume several times more electricity than a standard web search.

• Rapid Growth Outpacing Efficiency: While computing hardware is becoming more energy-efficient, the sheer exponential growth in the size and complexity of AI models, and the demand for their use, is outpacing those efficiency gains.

💧 Water Usage for Cooling

• Thirsty Data Centers: Data centers require a tremendous amount of water for cooling their equipment to prevent overheating. This water is often sourced from local municipal supplies.

  • This high water demand can strain water resources in the communities where data centers are built, potentially affecting local ecosystems and exacerbating water scarcity issues, which is fundamentally un-eco-friendly.

🗑️ E-Waste and Resource Extraction

• Hardware Demand: The boom in AI necessitates the constant manufacture, upgrade, and replacement of high-performance computing hardware (like GPUs).

• Resource Intensity: The production of this hardware requires the mining of critical minerals and rare earth elements, often extracted in environmentally destructive ways.

• Electronic Waste: The rapid turnover of equipment contributes to the growing problem of electronic waste ($\text{e-waste}$), which frequently contains hazardous substances.

🎯 Risk of Misguided or Over-Engineered Solutions

• Over-Engineering: AI solutions can sometimes be over-engineered or unnecessarily complex for environmental problems that already have simpler, more established solutions. It can become a "hammer looking for a nail."

• Focus on Symptoms, Not Root Causes: There's a risk of focusing on using AI to optimize current, unsustainable systems (e.g., maximizing the efficiency of fossil fuel extraction) rather than tackling the root causes of climate change (e.g., transitioning away from fossil fuels entirely).

Training and running large AI models require massive amounts of energy. Data centers that power these systems run 24 hours a day, consuming as much electricity as some small countries. For example, training one advanced AI model can emit as much carbon dioxide as five cars over their entire lifetimes.

Most of this energy still comes from fossil fuels, meaning every AI query, image, or chatbot conversation adds to the growing problem of carbon emissions. As AI becomes more popular, in schools, businesses, and entertainment, its carbon footprint grows even faster.

Some argue that AI can help fight climate change. But we must ask: is it worth using a tool that harms the planet to try to save it? Before expanding AI use, we should first make sure it’s powered by clean, renewable energy and used only where it truly makes a positive difference.

If we keep ignoring its environmental cost, the convenience AI brings today could become the pollution problem of tomorrow.

So let’s think twice before relying on AI for everything because protecting the planet should always come before powering a machine.

Many people believe that the main purpose of life is to find true happiness, and I completely agree with that idea. I believe that life is about being happy because it can motivate people to achieve their dreams. When you are happy, your mind is calm, which allows you to work more easily and make better decisions. Moreover, if people feel happy, they will be healthier, more friendly, and treat others with the same kindness.

However, there are other things we also need to care about, such as studying hard, earning money, and taking care of others even when we’re tired. Although happiness may not come immediately, it will last in the long term and make our lives truly meaningful.

In short, happiness is what gives life its value and makes every effort worth it.

Essay 2 – Disagree: Life is about being happy

While happiness is important, I believe that life has deeper meanings beyond just being happy. I don’t think that life is about being happy. There are still other things we need to care about, such as responsibility, kindness, and personal growth. If people only focus on happiness, the world may become selfish and unfair. For example, parents sometimes have to sacrifice their own happiness for their children. Even though it’s not always joyful, it’s still meaningful and full of love.

Still, I agree that happiness plays an important role in everyone’s life. We all deserve to be happy, but life is not just about chasing happiness — it’s also about learning, giving, and caring for others.

To sum up, happiness matters, but it’s not the only thing that makes life valuable.

💡 Happiness as the Ultimate Goal

From a philosophical standpoint, we can agree because for many, happiness (or eudaimonia, meaning "flourishing") is considered the ultimate or highest good.

• Aristotle's View: The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that the ultimate aim of human action is eudaimonia—often translated as a life well-lived or flourishing. He believed this was achieved through living a virtuous life and realizing one's full potential, which inherently leads to the deepest, most sustained form of "happiness."

• Utilitarianism: Philosophies like utilitarianism are based on the principle of maximizing overall happiness and minimizing suffering. This perspective directly centers happiness as the core metric for a meaningful and moral life.

🧠 Psychological and Biological Agreement

Modern psychology and biology also support happiness as central to human life.

• Motivation and Drive: Much of human behavior is driven by a desire to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Biologically, happiness (fueled by neurotransmitters like dopamine and serotonin) serves as a powerful positive reinforcement mechanism, encouraging us to repeat behaviors that support survival and well-being.

• Mental Well-being: Psychologically, happiness is a core component of mental health. A life lived in a state of relative happiness, contentment, and satisfaction is a life characterized by better resilience, stronger relationships, and greater overall productivity and creativity.

✨ Happiness as an Active State of Being

The phrasing "life is being happy" emphasizes that happiness isn't just a fleeting emotion or a goal to reach, but an active state of existence or a journey.

• It's a Practice, Not a Destination: We can agree that life is about being happy by recognizing that it's a daily practice of:

  • Mindfulness: Appreciating the present moment.

  • Gratitude: Focusing on what one has rather than what one lacks.

  • Meaning: Engaging in activities that provide purpose and contribute to something larger than oneself.

2 Rebuttal

🧐 Rebuttals to "Life is Being Happy"

1. The Argument from Emotional Spectrum

The rebuttal here is that life inherently includes a full range of emotions, and focusing only on happiness is unrealistic and dismissive of other necessary experiences.

·         The Rebuttal: "Life is not just being happy; life is being fully human. It encompasses a wide spectrum of emotions, including sadness, frustration, fear, and grief. These challenging emotions are essential for growth, empathy, and appreciating moments of joy. If you were happy all the time, happiness would lose its meaning."

·         Key Concept: Emotional realism and depth.

2. The Argument from Meaning and Purpose

This perspective suggests that a meaningful life is often more about contribution, challenge, and purpose than a constant state of contentment.

·         The Rebuttal: "Happiness can be a result of a life well-lived, but it isn't the definition of life itself. Many deeply meaningful aspects of life—like raising a child, building a business, or advocating for change—involve long periods of struggle, sacrifice, and discomfort. A life defined by purpose, challenge, and contribution is often richer than one defined solely by constant, passive contentment."

·         Key Concept: Eudaimonia (flourishing) vs. Hedonia (pleasure/happiness).

3. The Argument from Biological Function/Definition

This takes a more literal, philosophical, or scientific approach to defining life.

·         The Rebuttal: "From a fundamental perspective, 'life' is a biological process involving growth, metabolism, response to stimuli, and reproduction. Happiness is a subjective, psychological state. While a wonderful aspect of the human experience, it is not a prerequisite or a definition of existence."

·         Key Concept: Defining life literally.

4. The Argument from Impermanence (The Stoic/Buddhist View)

This view challenges the sustainability and reality of constant happiness.

·         The Rebuttal: "Happiness is inherently fleeting and temporary. Life, by its nature, involves constant change, loss, and cycles of difficulty. If life was being happy, then every moment of inevitable suffering or boredom would mean you have 'failed' at life, which is a fundamentally flawed and unattainable standard."

·         Key Concept: Acceptance of suffering and change.

🎯 A Strong, Concise Counter-Sentence:

If you need a single punchy line, try:

"Life is not a pursuit of constant happiness; it is an engagement with reality."

There are 3 things to be rich:

• The first one is we need to be clever or good at some jobs that earns money much because when we have much moneys we can buy anything that we want.

• The second one is we need to have good health because when we have good health, we can enjoy the moneys that we earns.

• The third one is we need to have positive personalities because when we have positive personalities, the other people will honor us.

  So the poor people can do this things to be shine far away.

  
  

The poor people in the future will make the the other people not really comfortable, they can make something bad for the other too,...

There are three things to be good but the people who suffer can't do:

• The first one is we need to be clever or good at some jobs that earns money much because when we have much moneys we can buy anything that we want.

• The second one is we need to have good health because when we have good health, we can enjoy the moneys that we earns.

• The third one is we need to have positive personalities because when we have positive personalities, the other people will honor us.

  So the poor people can do this things to be shine far away.

  So the people who suffer can't be shine.

First, going through hardships helps people develop resilience. For example, athletes who face injuries often build the mental strength to recover and push through pain. They learn how to rise again instead of giving up. Similarly, individuals who go through personal struggles, like the loss of a loved one, often become stronger and more determined in the long run.

Second, such experiences deepen their understanding and empathy. For instance, people who have struggled with financial hardship often become more compassionate toward others in similar situations. They know firsthand how difficult it can be, which makes them kinder and more supportive of others. This empathy allows them to connect with others on a deeper level.

Lastly, overcoming difficulties helps them truly appreciate the value of success. Take entrepreneurs, for example. Many successful business owners have faced multiple failures before achieving success. After overcoming those challenges, each success becomes even more meaningful to them. They don’t take opportunities for granted and are often willing to work harder than others, knowing the effort it takes to succeed.

Inconclusion, I agree with the statement " People who suffer the hardest can shine the most".

• Goals: Having clear, desirable objectives.

• Agency (Willpower): The motivation and belief in one's capacity to meet the goals.

• Pathways: The ability to generate specific routes and alternative strategies to achieve those goals.

Key Reasons Hope is Essential for Work

Hope directly impacts several critical areas of professional life, making it a necessity for both individual success and organizational health.

1. Motivation and Engagement

Hope is the primary fuel for motivation. When employees feel hopeful about their future within the organization—seeing a clear, positive path for their career and believing their work matters—they are more likely to be engaged and approach their tasks with enthusiasm. Without hope, motivation sags, leading to disengagement and a feeling of just "going through the motions."

2. Resilience and Persistence

Work is inevitably filled with setbacks, challenges, and obstacles. Hope is a powerful buffer that allows individuals to navigate these difficult times.

• Resilient employees view problems not as dead ends but as opportunities for learning and growth.

• A hopeful person believes that even if their initial plan (Pathway A) fails, they have the ability (Agency) to find a new solution (Pathway B or C) to still reach their goal. This persistence is vital for overcoming adversity and seeing projects through to completion.

3. Innovation and Creativity

High-hope individuals are more likely to be innovative. This is because they:

• Are less afraid of failure, as they believe a better outcome is still possible.

• Are more inclined to explore multiple "pathways" or solutions, which fosters creative problem-solving.

• Are willing to take calculated risks on new ideas, knowing that even if one attempt doesn't work out, it won't derail their overall future success.

4. Psychological Well-being

Hope is strongly correlated with positive psychological well-being. It acts as a shield against the negative effects of stress and anxiety in the workplace. Employees with a strong sense of hope:

• Experience lower levels of burnout.

• Have a greater sense of purpose and meaning in their daily tasks.

• Are generally happier and healthier, leading to reduced absenteeism and improved focus.

A company culture fostered by hopeful leaders who provide a clear vision and genuine support helps ensure employees feel valued, safe, and optimistic about their future, which ultimately drives better performance and loyalty.

First of all, hope fuels motivation. It gives people a clear reason to start something and to continue working hard. For example, office workers who believe their effort can lead to a promotion are usually more motivated to finish their tasks, take initiative, and look for ways to improve their performance. This sense of hope pushes them to work more proactively.

Secondly, hope can reduce stress. When people feel hopeful, they tend to be more confident about achieving their goals. Take employees as an example—when they believe they can solve a problem, they stay calmer and think more clearly instead of panicking. As a result, they can handle challenges more effectively and maintain a better work attitude.

Finally, hope helps people build resilience. It makes them more determined when facing difficulties. For instance, football players who experience failure often come back even stronger. Their hope of improving encourages them to practice nonstop, no matter the time, weather, or pressure. This shows how hope can turn setbacks into motivation.

In conclusion, I completely agree that hope is necessary for work. It motivates us, reduces our stress, and strengthens our resilience, helping us stay committed even when the journey is not easy.

First, hope is what we believe that something good will come or something bad will come. Example, a man go to work on a bank, he wants to the work to be good but he can't do it so now he need to hope for good things to works on that bank.

Second, hope can take away stress. When people are hopeful, the big things that they hope to change the life, if they

True progress requires initiative. A student who delays studying because “success takes time” is not patient but idle. A worker who postpones action under the pretense of patience risks stagnation. Patience without effort is nothing more than inaction, and inaction is the essence of laziness.

By glorifying patience, society risks encouraging passivity. Waiting endlessly for opportunities instead of creating them wastes potential. In this sense, patience often serves as a socially acceptable excuse for laziness, allowing people to avoid responsibility while appearing virtuous.

For example, a farmer plants seeds and then waits for them to grow. That is patience. A lazy farmer never plants at all. Patience is about effort plus time, while laziness is about avoiding effort.

Patience also helps people make better choices. Rushing often leads to mistakes, but patience gives time to think and prepare. Many cultures see patience as a strength, not a weakness.

So patience is not an excuse for laziness. It is a skill that helps people succeed.

Education is a fundamental human right and a powerful tool for social mobility. It equips individuals with the knowledge and skills needed to participate fully in society and the economy. When children in underserved regions gain access to quality education, they are more likely to escape poverty, contribute to their communities, and promote peace and stability.

Moreover, education fosters gender equality and empowers marginalized groups. Girls who receive education are less likely to marry early, more likely to earn income, and more likely to raise healthier families. In this way, education not only benefits individuals but also strengthens entire societies.

Despite its potential, challenges remain. Funding gaps, political instability, and cultural differences can hinder progress. However, through international cooperation—such as global education funds, teacher exchange programs, and digital learning initiatives—these obstacles can be overcome.

In conclusion, universal access to quality education is not just a policy; it is a pathway to a fairer, more peaceful world. By investing in education, we invest in the future of humanity.