https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw My explanation of this issue en-us 2016-08-30 15:30:39 UTC 2026-01-16 04:23:25 UTC hello@padlet.com olga_medvedieva https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120604376 A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on previous knowledge or observation. It can be tested by conducting an experiment, with the results either supporting, or debunking it, depending on the outcome.]]> 2016-08-30 15:49:40 UTC https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120604376 olga_medvedieva https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120606963 A theory is a repeatedly tested explanation that unites an extensive range of observations.To retain its status, it must never be shown to be inaccurate; otherwise, it is simply refuted, (note: theories can evolve, if they were not completely wrong, yet not fully right).]]> 2016-08-30 15:56:23 UTC https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120606963 olga_medvedieva https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120612536 A law is concise statement, based on experimental data, which is always shown to be true. It cannot be invalidated.]]> 2016-08-30 16:12:24 UTC https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120612536 olga_medvedieva https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120615177 Both hypotheses and theories can be shown to be false; however, theories require continual testing to be formed, while hypotheses only need prior knowledge/inspection to be created. Both a law and a theory need some experimental data to be comprised. In spite of that, a law describes how; a theory attempts to describe why. Lastly, laws and hypotheses are based of examination, yet, as mentioned before, a hypothesis can be disproved, while a law simply cannot. ]]> 2016-08-30 16:20:14 UTC https://padlet.com/olga_medvedieva/hypothesistheorylaw/wish/120615177