• firstly, tourism should be limited and be very regulated

• The fees should be very high as to not concurrence the Panama canal

• and the money should be used to help environment and indigeonous society

Pola:

• Exclude tourism to avoid commercialisation of the region

• Impose heavy restrictions regarding the amount of tonnes moved through the area, as well as ship amounts

• Make it into Carbon Trading/ Offsetting system→ reduce the amount of investors, make it sustainable

• Limit arctic council members so they prioritise protection of the area instead of their own interest

• Merge Innuit Council with Arctic Council

Nefeli:

• Governments / organizations should impose policies regarding the size and number of ships allowed to pass

• Constant monitoring and control / applying fees to those who don’t follow the laws

• Not used for commercial reasons 

• Include inuit representation in the arctic council 

Ryan:

Remove national EEZs, as to make it more similar to locations such as the Panama, or the Suez, due to its key role as an economic and naval transportation route.

Merge/Represent The ICC within the Arctic council so that a greater level of local representation and interactions.

Limit the amount of touristic outing in the region, or massively increase price as a carbon offset strategy. 

Kaina

Regarding environmental considerations, with the looming threat of climate change, it would be beneficial for governments to impose restrictions on how much cargo and number ships that can pass through. This would also solve issues of the Panama Canal losing money.