How can the toolkit be used to prioritise health broadly in your institution?

How can the toolkit support obtaining buy in from senior management in your institution?

How can the toolkit leverage buy in from champions?

Can the toolkit support your institution’s year end reporting to the HEA, given it is not required?

Who will contribute to the completion of the self-evaluation tool?

How will the data be collated?

Who inputs to the tool?

How often will the tool be completed?

Domains: Thinking of the domains in the analysis presented by David, what emphasis should there be on types of domains? 

Domains: How do we balance the domains to ensure that we achieve a whole of campus approach?

Indicators: What emphasis should there be on process versus outcome indicators?How many, what should be measured, how do we prioritise? Note: the upper and lower range of indicators on the five tools is 42 items - 113 items.

Resources: What types of resources would be helpful for HEIs to have e.g. case studies of successful programmes, measures like sample surveys, qualitative focus group interview schedules, action plans/logic models, programme plans with aims, objectives, KPIs, etc., annual reports, journal articles, books and chapters, national strategies that inform Healthy Campus. 

Reporting: what type of report should the Healthy Campus toolkit in your area produce? Would something specific like the AESEAN model that delivers outputs at a granular level or would something more high level be appropriate?  

Action planning: How can the output of the tool inform action planning in your institution?