2.3 Activity: Case study by Gia Instructor https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28 Purpose en-us 2025-05-08 03:42:56 UTC 2025-12-20 21:41:19 UTC hello@padlet.com The former GO assets served the interest of the public. The privatisation arguably, or in the first instance benefited private shareholders. It bough it can be argued despite slower rise in gap over time, privatisation may have benefited increased jobs in communities at a higher rate of pay. Private investors may in fact have been re-investing back into society through major development and job creation with business ventures…. https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729332603 2025-12-20 21:37:57 UTC https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729332603 https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729332933 Per answer to question 1, it’s possible. Perhaps the quality of the utility increased with privatisation also.

]]> 2025-12-20 21:39:36 UTC https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729332933 https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729333279 I don’t agree nor disagree. I feel that value is what I’m willing to pay. But when I have no alternative I.e government it is where my perceived value erodes.

]]> 2025-12-20 21:41:18 UTC https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/jpyhsp6t1olouk28/wish/3729333279