<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Descartes Shared Inquiry First Group on the Outside by Jael Reboh</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj</link>
      <description>What is the essence of a Padlet? </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-12-12 03:47:58 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-12-12 17:53:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1A. Compare and contrast Aristotle and Descartes’s proofs for the existence of God. Whose argument is stronger? Is either argument is convincing? </title>
         <author>jreboh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701064</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-12 03:51:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701064</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2A. Both Plato and Descartes provide specific functions to the various faculties of the human mind (imagination, belief, understanding). Compare and contrast the two epistemological theories. Whose theory is stronger?</title>
         <author>jreboh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701090</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-12 03:51:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701090</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3A. What is Descartes argument for the existence of material? Is it convincing? </title>
         <author>jreboh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701112</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-12 03:52:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701112</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4A. Descartes claims that “I think, therefore I am” is the only thing of which one can be immediately and absolutely certain of. What is his argument? Is it convincing?</title>
         <author>jreboh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701151</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-12 03:52:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313701151</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WTF</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313953618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>WHat happened hereI dont know<br>I want a staring contest with REBOH</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-12 17:35:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jreboh/jn3ovifufhvj/wish/313953618</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
