<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment 1.2 by Mrs Vicki</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-01-24 21:15:10 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-03-22 18:07:12 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>SarAnLy</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209086</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q2a (i) Yes . It has been proven. The bi-polar graph shows that there are more positive opinion compared to negative perceptio</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:09:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209086</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Afisziant</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209108</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2I)Yes,the hypothesis has been proven. As seen in Fig.5,most of the factor listed are in the positive side of the graph that is plotted.Example, tourists visit Gardens by the Bay because of 'uniqueness of plant ',which plays a big role as tourists would like to see a variety of plants and that is what Garden by the Bay delivers thus 'Tourists visits Gardens by the Bay because theirpositive  perception of the place</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:09:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209108</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209127</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:09:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209127</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>77🎮🎨👾🎨🎮</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209183</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q1a) Honeypot tourism. It promotes it as one of the world best scenicnspot<br><br></div><div>Q2ai)yes because most were positive perception. Like high uniqueness of plants had 45 positive perception but had 2 negativ perception. Also good cleanliness had42 positive perception but had 2 negative perception.<br>Q2aii) It is not reliable because the data collected is not accurate to say that the different perceptions of tourist<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:10:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209183</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kagan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q2a) the hypothesis is proven. Based on fig 5 ,45 out of the 50 tourists have a positive perception of the uniqueness of plants and 5 tourists had a negative perception of the uniqueness of the plants at gardens by the Bay. Therefore.....</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:13:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dinis Brindi Syafi🚲 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209443</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2ai) The hypothesis has been proven true. The bipolar graph shows more positive ratings as compared to the negative ones. It highlights on certain qualities like having high uniqueness of plants, as seen from the 40 or so tourists that think so. Good cleanliness is also another very positive factor which 38 tourists also agreed on. Thus the hypothesis has been proven.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:13:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209443</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Fabian fan club</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209631</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2ai) the hypothesis is proven since most of the tourist have positive views of the place with only one out of four has more negative than positive. The uniqueness of plants have 45/50 whilst the cleanliness have 39 being positive.despite the accessibility being slightly more negative than positive, the qualities &nbsp; of the conservatories still postive despite being close. Therefore even though the accessibility is within the negative range, the positive aspects still greatly outweighs the negative aspects, attracting tourists. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:15:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209631</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nipierremad</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209686</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2c) Go in groups to prevent from getting harmed<br> by suspicious characters. Going in groups make predators feel out numbered.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:16:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149209686</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q2d) KTK</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210056</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>All answers will be relevant to your research . the results are easy to analyse using graphs and table . the questionnaire can include some open ended questions so that u get personal opinion from the tourist and that they are not limited in their response <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:19:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210056</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Illega</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210062</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:19:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210062</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>👳🏿👲🏼👨🏾</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210063</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2c) students should travel in pairs or groups and look out for each other in the case that they get lost or in trouble.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:19:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210063</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SarAnLy</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210597</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q2d) The advantage of a questionnaire is that it is quick and simple. It is also easier to collate the data and present in a graph if necessary . The questionnaire is too vague and can be improved by being more specific. They should also include personal opinions such as asking them why they like the location. The questionnaire can include more question like 'who they came with to gardens by the Bay'.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-25 02:25:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/libra_keekee/jlas4g0k8h55/wish/149210597</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
