Remake of Was British Imperialism in India positive or negative for the Indians? by James Kessler https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl Analyze each document and answer the historical question based on the contents of the document. en-us 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC 2025-11-03 14:20:58 UTC hello@padlet.com Document 8 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628028 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628028 Document 11 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628031  ]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628031 Document 7 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628032 Also, under the imperial control of the East India Company, an increasing number of small Indian states were forced to pay dues to the Company for military protection.  The lessening of Company profits and a need to recoup debts generated by military efforts produced a need for higher revenues.  Peasant landowners, required to pay their taxes in cash, increasingly had to turn to moneylenders who seized much of this land for nonpayment of loans. 

 

]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628032 Document 3 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628035 In India during the 1860s, marriage meant girls getting married below 8 or 9 years old.  It wasn’t until 1880 that child marriage as a problem became a public issue in India during the debate on the Age of Consent Bill.  Towards the end of the debate a child wife of eleven years old, named Phulmani, died when her husband raped her.  More than 500 women doctors sent a memorandum to the Viceroy requesting him to stop marriage of girls below 14 years of age.  The resulting bill compromised at 12 years old.  On August 15, 1884 a Parsee reformist, Behramji Malabari, circulated two notes which highlighted the evils of child marriage and enforced widowhood.  The Honorable J. Gibbs added his comments to Malabari’s notes saying that, "Young mothers become stunted in growth, and often become invalids for life, while children were too often puny and weak." Kadhavdas added to the list of evils, "Early marriage is a great obstacle in the progress of female education."  The English, who were ignorant of the long tradition of Indian spiritual literature, declared that there was no religious basis for child marriage and found support for their beliefs from their supporters within the Brahmin caste.  Nearly all British educated Indians of the era supported the English position that child marriage was evil and destroying the fabric of Indian society. ]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628035 Document 10 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628036 The British East India Company ruled India with little interference from the British government. The company even had its own army, led by British officers and staffed by Sepoys, or Indian soldiers.  Most of the company's troops were Hindus or Muslims.  About one in six was British.  Yet, only the British could be commissioned officers; no Indian could reach a higher rank than that of petty officer. 
 
 ]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628036 Document 6 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628038 Under the rule of the British, the laying of the world's third largest railroad network was accomplished.  The railroads allowed the British to transport raw materials from the interior to the ports and manufactured goods back again.  The majority of the raw materials were agricultural products produced on plantations.  Plantation crops included tea, indigo, coffee, cotton, and jute. Another crop was opium.  The British shipped opium to China and exchanged it for tea, which they then sold in England. 
 
 The railroads also allowed India to develop a modern economy and brought unity to connected regions.  Along with the railroads, a modern road network, telephone, and telegraph lines, dams, bridges, and irrigation canals enabled India to modernize. 

 
 
]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628038 Document 2 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628040 The mutiny (discussed in Doc 1 above) marked a turning point in Indian history.  As a result of the mutiny, in 1858 the British government took direct command of India.  The part of India that was under direct British rule was called the Raj.  The term Raj referred to British rule over India from 1757 until 1914.  India was divided into 11 provinces and some 250 districts.  Sometimes a handful of British officials were the only British among a million or so people in the district.  A viceroy, or a British-general, carried out the government's orders.]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628040 Document 9 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628042 The British held much of the political and economic power. British policies called for India to produce raw materials for British manufacturing and to buy British manufactured goods.  In addition, Indian competition with British goods was prohibited.  For example, India's own handloom textile industry was almost put out of business by British textiles.  Cheap cloth and ready-made clothes from England flooded the Indian market and drove out local producers.  To pay for British imports, Indians had to raise cash crops such as tea, pepper, coffee, and cotton.  As Indian farmers grew less food, famines became frequent and widespread. 
 

]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628042 Document 5 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628046 Britain introduced changes that affected Indian society.  Improved health care and sanitary conditions led to population growth.  The British set up schools and colleges to educate higher-caste Indians.  The course of study stressed English language and culture. 

 

]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628046 Document 1 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628051 The English colony of India was run by the British East India Company under a charter issued by the British government. This charter allowed the company to run India as a "private" country and gave them exclusive trading rights. The company was only interested in annual profits and largely ignored the culture and needs of the Indian people.
 
 In 1857, new cartridges were issued to Indian troops of the British East Indian Army. These native Indian troops were called Sepoys. The cartridges were rumored to have been greased with cow or pig grease; as such, they were forbidden to the Indian troops because of their religious beliefs. The cartridges of this time required a soldier to tear open the cartridge with his teeth, and pour the powder and bullet down the barrel of the gun. After refusing to use the new cartridges, a whole regiment of Sepoy troops were imprisoned by the British. Other Sepoys attempted to free these prisoners and it snowballed into a revolt across all of northern India. There were many massacres where hundreds of Europeans were killed by Sepoys who were bent on revenge and on kicking the British out of India. 
 
 Eventually, pockets of Europeans, both civilians and army troops, held out against the Sepoys. They were finally rescued by British Army units in the fall of 1857. 
 

]]> 2019-04-02 13:53:35 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347628051 Document 4 kesslerj2021 https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347657033 Sati (Su-thi, a.k.a. suttee) is the traditional Hindu practice of a widow throwing herself on her husband's funeral pyre.  Sati was prevalent among certain sects of the society in ancient India, who either took the vow or deemed it a great honor to die on the funeral pyres of their husbands. Maha-sati stones (hero-stones) were erected in memory of brave women who committed sati and are periodically worshipped.  There are not many instances of remarriage of widows in Indian history and it is believed that women preferred death to the cursed life of a widow.  The ritual of sati was banned by the British Government in 1829.  However, it took large scale social reforms by Dayananda Saraswati (of Arya Samaj), Mahatma Gandhi, and the like to actually stop the practice. Today, there was one instance of a Sati reported in Rajasthan (late 1980s), that caused a lot of controversy and social turmoil. ]]> 2019-04-02 14:42:30 UTC https://padlet.com/kesslerj2021/jibgc5viwhwl/wish/347657033