only focusing on just one case and generlizing without enough evidence is a hasty generlization

Logical fallacy: Hasty generalization

Reason: It's based on the personal anecdote and it has only one case.

Hasty Generalization

Smoking is usually bad for people. This is relevant fact. He applies the exception of his father to every people.

Hasty generalization

It's a small sample to consider it as a fact

Prohibiting drungs doesn't mean controlling every aspect of the citizens' lives, so it is a slippery slope.

Prohibiting drugs is small evidence and it is causing undesirable drastic outcome.

There is no direct connection between donating to a food bank, and winning the lottery.

Logical fallacy: Either-or

Reason: It's saying as if we only have two options, but actually, there are multiple options that government can conduct.

There may be other choices, but it is suggesting only one choice, so this is an either-or fallacy.

In reality, there may be different solutions, but this sentence suggests only two options.

Hasty Generalization: ‘Smoking really can’t be that bad’ is a conclusion based on a small and exceptional sample, just one person’s experience.

The cause and effect is connected wrongly, and this is a false cause fallacy.

Slippery slope

Initial action that not prohibiting drugs lead to drastic change like banning and cigarettes, sugar and junk food..

Logical fallacy: Slippery slope

Reason: Only by increasing low-level employees' salaries, consumers won't be hurt that much.

Either-or

Increasing price is not only a way for better salaries for low-level employees. There is ways such as decreasing salaries for high level employees

Logical Fallacy: False cause

Reason: There are no relation between lottery and donation.

Hasty Generalization: In most cases, smoking isn't good for health. A's father's case is an exceptional case.

False cause

You got the winner ticket because you are just lucky,it's not because you did a good deed

Slippery Slope : An initial action of the government prohibiting drugs changed into an extreme outcome without any evidence to substantiate the claim.

It oversimplifies a complex issue by suggesting only two choices. There may be other ways of giving more salaries for low-level employees.

Slippery slope:

It has a jump in cause and effect. It is leading to drastic change.

D is falsely thinking the cause of his lottery winning, which there aren't any connection between the cause and effect.

: Either -or

it can have other choices, but it is suggesting only two choices. ( increasing prices or not increasing salaries)