<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My journal by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/djett2/jggi2akae48t1am</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-12-13 03:36:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-12-13 03:40:59 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Treatment</title>
         <author>djett2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/djett2/jggi2akae48t1am/wish/3258199299</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Summary:</strong></p><p>With an emphasis on patients receiving both group and individual treatment, this research investigates the experiences of patients who maintained psychotherapy during the COVID-19 epidemic. Patients who switched to online platforms discovered benefits and drawbacks to the virtual environment. Despite the lack of in-person meetings, the majority said that internet treatment was successful and preserved a healthy therapeutic alliance.</p><p>The flexibility and convenience of virtual sessions were valued by many, but there was also a need for the human connection that comes with in-person treatment. The ability to view personal areas was a novel feature of group therapy conducted virtually, and many participants felt that it improved their sense of community. The study underscores the increasing significance of comprehending patient viewpoints as healthcare systems adjust and increase the utilization of online mental health services in the wake of global issues like the pandemic, notwithstanding some worries regarding the loss of the nuanced communication that comes with in-person sessions.</p><p><strong>Compare and Contrast:</strong></p><p><strong>Contrast:</strong></p><p>SARS-CoV-2 and HIV are two very different global health emergencies that need for different solutions. First discovered in the early 1980s, HIV spread more slowly and took a long time to incubate, delaying detection and action worldwide. Since it developed slowly, many impacted groups experienced prejudice, and early responses were enmeshed in stigma and false information.</p><p>Yet as time went on, major medical advancements—most notably antiretroviral treatment, or ART—turned HIV from a deadly illness into a chronic, treatable illness. ART significantly increased the life expectancy of people living with HIV and helped lower transmission rates. In contrast, COVID-19 sprang out of nowhere in late 2019 and quickly expanded over the world in a few months. Healthcare systems throughout the world were overtaken by its sudden severity and quick spread. Rapid vaccine and antiviral medication development characterized the reaction, but the nature of COVID-19—a disease with acute and sometimes fatal symptoms—required a swift and extensive worldwide response, underscoring the glaring disparities in effect and urgency when compared to HIV.</p><p><strong>Compare:</strong></p><p>Notwithstanding these distinctions, the two pandemics highlight universal principles of adaptability and resilience. HIV brought to light the significance of managing chronic, long-term illnesses and the need to continue to care for and assist those infected with the virus.</p><p>Parallel to this, COVID-19 showed that healthcare solutions must be quick and adaptable. Both pandemics spurred innovation while exposing the shortcomings of the current healthcare system. For example, the development of COVID-19 vaccines in such a short period was unprecedented, and the development of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV was a revolutionary step in treatment. The socioeconomic injustices that underpin health crises were also exposed by both pandemics since disadvantaged and marginalized groups were disproportionately impacted.</p><p>At first, HIV was thought to impact a smaller, stigmatized population, but COVID-19 made everyone realize how interrelated global health is and that nobody is safe until everyone is safe. In the end, COVID-19 and HIV have both changed public health responses, highlighting the urgent need for both long-term planning and quick innovation to address future health emergencies.</p><p><strong>APA Citations:</strong></p><p>          Van Bavel, B., Curtis, D. R., Dijkman, J., Hannaford, M., De Keyzer, M., Van Onacker, E., &amp; Soens, T. (2020). <em>Disasters and History: The Vulnerability and Resilience of Past Societies</em>. Cambridge University Press</p><p>Giordano, C., Ambrosiano, I., Graffeo, M. T., Di Caro, A., &amp; Gullo, S. (2022b). The transition to online psychotherapy during the pandemic: a qualitative study on patients’ perspectives. <em>Research in Psychotherapy Psychopathology Process and Outcome</em>. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.638">https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.638</a></p><p><em>Types of COVID-19 Treatment</em>. (2024, July 12). COVID-19. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.cdc.gov/covid/treatment/index.html">https://www.cdc.gov/covid/treatment/index.html</a></p><p>Link: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9893047/">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9893047/</a></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9893047/" />
         <pubDate>2024-12-13 03:40:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/djett2/jggi2akae48t1am/wish/3258199299</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
