Structural Contingency Theory by https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1 en-us 2019-04-18 02:51:29 UTC 2023-03-05 07:56:34 UTC hello@padlet.com What is Structural Contingency Theory nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378922051 "Structural contingency theory holds that there is no one best way, meaning that no single structure or structural type is optimal for all organizations. Instead, the structure that is most effective is the structure that fits certain factors, called contingencies. Thus the effectiveness of a structure depends on the degree to which it fits the contingencies".]]> 2019-09-01 03:14:13 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378922051 Factors nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378922701 Contingency factors can differ amongst organizations.  In education, one must take into account size, task, technology, accountability, and shareholder involvement.  There is not any optimal way to organize and exceptional organization is contingent on environmental components.]]> 2019-09-01 03:27:30 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378922701 Adaptation nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378923261 Educational leaders must adapt structural contingency theories to promote change and stay relevant to the needs of its students and staff.  Stages of the structural contingency model are
1.    An organization is in fit
2.    There is a contingency change
3.    The organization is in misfit and performance suffers
4.    The organization does structural adaption
5.    The organization achieves a new fit and performance recovers
]]> 2019-09-01 03:41:10 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378923261 Criticism nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924052 “Contingency theory requires that when a mismatch occurs between the leader and the situation, either the leader is changed or the situation is engineered to fit the leader” (Owings & Kaplan, 2012, p. 155).  Strictly following this model leaves little room for flexibility.  “Fiedler believed that because our natural leadership style is fixed, the most effective way to handle situations is to change the leader” not for the leader to try and adapt to his or her environment.]]> 2019-09-01 03:57:29 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924052 History nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924571 Fred Fiedler was a “professor of management and research sociologist at the University of Illinois and later the University of Washington” was on the forefront of developing a model to outline some potential leaders “leadership orientation” (Owings & Kaplan, 2012, p. 153).  Fiedler was instrumental in his work on defining characteristics of good leaders and how they might apply to different situations.]]> 2019-09-01 04:07:58 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924571 References nalantor https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924681
Owings, W. A., & Kaplan, L. S. (2012). Leadership and organizational behavior in education:     theory into practice. Boston: Pearson.

(n.d.). Fiedler's Contingency Model: Matching Leadership Style to a Situation. Retrieved from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/fiedler.htm

Donaldson, L. (2013, January 28). Structural Contingency Theory/Information Processing Theory. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199846740/obo-9780199846740-0062.xml

Powers, J. (2000). Organizational Theories and the Educational Organization. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.6669&rep=rep1&type=pdf]]> 2019-09-01 04:10:41 UTC https://padlet.com/nalantor/jfyd7pvpfyp1/wish/378924681