https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl Using Figure 7.14 (distribution → consumption → living standards), choose the view you support. Like the stance you agree with and post one short reason under that stance. Use one causal verb (limits/raises/reduces/constrains) and. If possible, share one number or source which can support your view. en-us 2025-06-11 12:22:15 UTC 2025-10-22 16:57:08 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/8.0/svg/1fa99.svg ldai0021 https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645686693 Some argue that greater income inequality can stimulate economic growth and in the long-term make everyone better off, even the poor. The benefits for groups at the top eventually trickle down to those at the bottom.

]]> 2025-10-22 16:56:01 UTC https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645686693 ldai0021 https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645687997 Others argue the reverse that too much inequality actually slows the growth in output, incomes and wellbeing.

]]> 2025-10-22 16:56:51 UTC https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645687997 ldai0021 https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645688428 There is also the social cohesion argument that says that too much inequality can be destabilising leading to unrest and political instability

]]> 2025-10-22 16:57:07 UTC https://padlet.com/ldai0021/jcppdxtgfz868frl/wish/3645688428