Whether it is necessary to spend such a great cost to protect cultural heritage？Why？ by gao zeo

zeogao0916 — 2024-12-29 10:02:01 UTC

Yes, it's necessary because cultural heritage is irreplaceable. Once lost, we can't recover the historical knowledge, artistic techniques, and collective identity these artifacts represent. The cost of protection is an investment in preserving our humanity's story for future generations.

zeogao0916 — 2024-12-29 10:04:32 UTC

Cultural heritages are witnesses of human history. For example, the old temples in the areas that might be flooded because of the dam construction. They carry thousands of years of religious, artistic and architectural wisdom of ancient Egypt.

zeogao0916 — 2024-12-29 10:05:24 UTC

This is good for the cultural education development of the whole society. It makes us not lose our roots in the process of modernization. The cost we pay is for the priceless spiritual nourishment.

zeogao0916 — 2024-12-29 10:06:33 UTC

If they are damaged, we'll lose the real clues to touch our ancestors' great creativity forever. What's more, in the long run, protecting these heritages can boost local tourism. With culture as the foundation, it can attract tourists from all over the world. The cost we put in will finally get returns from tourism income and cultural spreading benefits.