<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>ima-multid by Samuel Micka</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid</link>
      <description>A place to share ideas for topological descriptors.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-08-12 16:49:26 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-08-16 14:06:22 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273252607</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Persistence Diagrams<strong><br>Distances between descriptors: </strong>Focusing on bottleneck distance between two persistence diagrams<strong><br>Short explanation: </strong>Measures the largest distance between the matching of two points (or one point and the diagonal) in the "best" matching between two diagrams (and their subsequent diagonals)<strong><br>Reference to first use: </strong>Edelsbrunner and Harer, Computational Topology, an Introduction<strong><br>Pros: </strong>Fast, simple to visualize and describe, stable relative to the distance between the real-valued functions on the topological space<br><strong>Cons: </strong>Sensitive to outliers</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-15 13:53:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273252607</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273339080</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name:</strong> Mapper/Reeb Cosheaf<br><strong>Distances between descriptors:</strong> Mapper can be seen as a cosheaf construction, and there is a natural interleaving metric defined between cosheaves.<br><strong>Short explanation:</strong> Measures the amount of smoothing necessary to be able to map one Mapper into the other.<br><strong>Reference to first use:</strong> Elizabeth Munch and Bei Wang, Convergence between Categorical Representations of Reeb Space and Mapper<br><strong>Pros: </strong>Easy to visualize and explain, computation of Mapper is efficient.<br><strong>Cons:</strong> Computing distances is difficult</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-15 20:01:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273339080</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273339818</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Metric Graph<br><strong>Distances between descriptors: </strong>persistence-distortion distance<br><strong>Short explanation: </strong>The Hausdorff distance between two sets of persistent diagrams obtained from the graphs.<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Dey, Shi, Wang; Comparing graphs via Persistence Distortion<br><strong>Pros: </strong>Stable under perturbations<br><strong>Cons: </strong>Computationally not easy, not a metric, non-isomorphic graphs can have distance zero.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-15 20:06:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273339818</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273340372</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Persistence Images<br><strong>Distances: </strong>any metric on Rn<br><strong>Short explanation: </strong>Vectorize each persistence diagram by centering a weighted kernel at each point in the persistence diagram<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>&nbsp;Adams et al. Persistence Images, JMLR 2017<br><strong>Pros: </strong>Opens the door to many machine learning algorithms that require more than just the distance between points. There is lots of flexibility. PIs are stable with respect to 1-Wasserstein metric. You have the option of using lots of different metrics.<br><strong>Cons: </strong>can't go backwards from this vector representation to the persistence diagram again. There are some parameters to choose (like resolution, the weighting function). There is not a way to recover the persistence diagram from the image.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-15 20:11:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273340372</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273478626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name:&nbsp;</strong>CROCKER plot&nbsp;<br><strong>Distances:&nbsp;</strong>·The matrix can be vectorized, so any distance that works in Euclidean space is applicable, i.e. L_1, L_2, L_\infty, angle between subspaces, etc.<br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> Simple representation of two-parameter persistence, where we compute the number of topological features at each of the two parameters. This gives a betti count (i.e. dimension of the homology vector space) for every input and can be represented as a matrix and visualized as a contour plot<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Topological Data Analysis of Biological Aggregation Models – PLOS One, 2015, Topaz, Ziegelmeier, Halverson<br><strong>Pros: </strong>can concatenate different features, vector representation, can perform machine learning tasks, can observe how homology changes<br><strong>Cons: </strong>not stable, same features are not tracked from one set of parameters to the next.<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 13:54:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273478626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>PHT Transform<br><strong>Distances between descriptors: </strong>sum of d_B between matching of diagrams<br><strong>Short explanation: </strong>Set of persistence diagrams related to simplicial complex/mesh embedded in R^k<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Kate Turner's PHT<br><strong>Pros: </strong>straight foward to describe geometrically, captures geometry, stable<br><strong>Cons: </strong>sensitive to rotation, can involve a lot of computation depending on the shape,<br>information loss can be large if not done correctly</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 13:57:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479443</link>
         <description><![CDATA[sum of d_B between matching of diagrams]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 13:57:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479443</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479670</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Euler Curve <br><strong>Distances: </strong>·distances between curves<br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> compute EC at every point in a filtered space<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>???<br><strong>Pros: </strong>fast<br><strong>Cons: </strong>not descriptive<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 13:58:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273479670</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273480211</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Persistence Landscapes <br><strong>Distances: </strong>·L_\infty distance<br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> Turn PD 45 degrees and create an arrangement of lines to summarize the size of features<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Bubenik 2013<br><strong>Pros: </strong>Based on barcode in vector space<br><strong>Cons: </strong>sensitive to outliers<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 13:59:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273480211</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481080</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Carlsson and Carlsson et al. summaries <br><strong>Distances: </strong>·any distance on $\mathbb{R}^n$<br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> Short set of statistics that are easily computed from the birth and death coordinates of persistence points.<br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Carlsson and Carlsson et al. (need to look up reference!)<br><strong>Pros: </strong>This is a simple summary of persistence diagrams, since there are several summaries of these points, it is<br><strong>Cons: </strong>You might lose information in this simplification.<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 14:02:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481080</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481636</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Betti Numbers <br><strong>Distances: </strong>·Euclidean distance between lines in crocker plot <br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> Motivated by classification <br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>??<br><strong>Pros: </strong>K-mediods (R Package) easy to use, Euclidean distance is very easy to compute<br><strong>Cons: </strong>Trying to find another way to measure distance: interleaving distance <br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 14:04:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481636</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Topological Descriptor</title>
         <author>mickas37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481884</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Name: </strong>Betti Numbers <br><strong>Distances: </strong>· Euclidean distance between Betti curves <br><strong>Short Explanation:</strong> attempt to construct simulated models; TDA project computes persistent homology of all the models to see what looks most realistic <br><strong>Reference to first use: </strong>Cliques of Neurons Bound into Cavities Provide a Missing Link between Structure and Function.&nbsp; Michael W Reimann, et al <br><strong>Pros: </strong>Euclidean distance easy to measure <br><strong>Cons: </strong>???<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-08-16 14:05:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickas37/ima_multid/wish/273481884</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
