https://padlet.com/wsims5158/j0zcm6o1hj2s Will, Jarod, zuzanna, jennifer en-us 2017-12-07 16:04:14 UTC 2026-01-18 05:41:08 UTC hello@padlet.com wsims5158 https://padlet.com/wsims5158/j0zcm6o1hj2s/wish/214184505 The conviction violates the 4th amendment because he has the right to privacy, they did not have a warrant, Carpenter feels it is an unreasonable seizure. They followed his GPS location for 28 days and that should be private without a warrant. Phone records should be suppressed if there is no warrant.]]> 2017-12-07 16:06:23 UTC https://padlet.com/wsims5158/j0zcm6o1hj2s/wish/214184505 wsims5158 https://padlet.com/wsims5158/j0zcm6o1hj2s/wish/214185606 The conviction does not violate the 4th amendment because of the probable cause of the other convict telling of his phone number. That everyone has access to your location through cell phones, so it is not private, and it was supported by an affirmation by another convict. An interference is not a search, therefore it does not need a search warrant.]]> 2017-12-07 16:08:30 UTC https://padlet.com/wsims5158/j0zcm6o1hj2s/wish/214185606