We did attempt to develop the song further in order to have a breakdown. However we felt that we didn't have enough time to complete this, so instead our group made a mutual decision to play through the song without using a breakdown or too many buildups. 

Before the performance, our song is described as a political folk song representing our anger towards the government’s views. I believed we followed through on this in the performance through the lyrics we used especially. Our peers thought that the style used was a good representation of our stimulus and that the lyrics accurately gave the point we were trying to get across. They also commented positively on the use of the texture when the bass came in and out of the song, and the levels of the song considering the limitations we had using an acoustic banjo. Therefore I would say the strengths of our song were the lyrics and the texture of the song through the use of dropping instruments out. 

In regards to my own strengths and weaknesses, I think the levels of my bass worked well in the group. To improve I would have added more differentiation in the parts I played in the song, such as a change of the notes I played to create a breakdown, and a better use of dynamics in he song. 

In conclusion, I would agree that our performance was reflective of our chosen stimulus and that it worked considerably well, thanks to the lyrics in particular. Yet, I think that there are many things that we would be able to improve on if we were to do the performance again. One of these being the structure.

Chorus:  D, E, F, E

(As played on the banjo + acoustic guitar. The bass guitar plays them as notes.)

Opinions that
We aren't your 

minions you twat
They listen to you 
You think your right
We all know you
Can't last the night. 

All these people
Chanting your name 
But mate it ain't a good way
Idea here and idea there
But where's our vote at.