My supercalifragilisticexpialidocious padlet by Nor Hayati Hussain

PROJECT 1: SELF RELECTION

norhayatihussain — 2016-09-23 01:13:37 UTC

FINAL SUBMISSION

GROUP 2

norhayatihussain — 2016-09-23 01:14:23 UTC

Group 4

prashobhnair — 2016-09-23 02:19:08 UTC

Group 1 Project Submission

2016-09-23 02:25:30 UTC

Surry Hills Library

2016-09-23 02:30:12 UTC

Group 4 (Assessment Sheet)

eap — 2016-09-23 02:30:25 UTC

--------------------------------------------------------------------
1. GROUP 1
Presentation was very good, clear. <3
2. GROUP 2
Good ,short and clearly presented.
3. GROUP 3
Good presentation, clear and detailed .=]

GROUP 3.1

2016-09-23 02:33:25 UTC

Group 1 (Assessment sheet

2016-09-23 02:34:02 UTC

-----------------------------------------
1.GROUP 2
The speaker was concise in what he wants to convey. Good presentation.

2.GROUP 3
good, short and clearly presented.

3.GROUP 4
-The speaker was good but how the building relates to themselves were not very clear.
-Points explained were quite long and detailed , maybe could be more simplified.

Group 3.1 Assessment Sheet

2016-09-23 02:36:21 UTC

Group 1
presentation was good and clear, concise (y)

Group 2
very good and clear presentation (y)

Group 4
less is more , very detailed

Group 4

prashobhnair — 2016-09-23 02:38:06 UTC

- Church of Light

Group 2

LAMBORCHINEE — 2016-09-23 03:13:00 UTC

Assessment sheet Group 2

LAMBORCHINEE — 2016-09-23 03:15:26 UTC

Group 1: Well done, have a good voice and clear presentation

Group 3: Amazing presentation, simple and clear

Group 4: Good but can be better in related the building to the group