<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>MLIM6319 CASE DISCUSSION L5 by Xiuyu Chen</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-03-02 08:23:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-04-20 02:40:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>How to stimulate collective intelligence within a team or society in large?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501002234</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Group members：<br>Tan Honghao<br>Wang Hongren<br>Xia Yiwen<br>Xie Dantong<br>You Lijun<br>Zheng Jiani<br><br>1. Make collaboration rewarding<br>Create a reward system in the community, either monetary or non-monetary.For example, some communities will encourage users to share, and after sharing, they will get points, which can be exchanged for some rights or items.By sharing, people can gain knowledge or money or experience.<br><br>2.Organize regular or occasional knowledge sharing events.&nbsp; It can facilitate the interaction of information, break the information gap, and brainstorming can produce some wonderful ideas.<br><br>3. Establish a common group goal. In order to achieve collective goals, each department and individual performs its own function, thus contributing to collective intelligence.<br><br>4.Carry out some good competitive activities. For example, the competitive act of project bidding, for example, facilitates competition among bidders, thus optimizing their respective proposals and contributing to collective intelligence.<br><br>5. Establish some norms and standards.To maintain a good communication environment and to monitor the behavior of participants, regulation is necessary.<br><br>6.Acceptance of different team members and cultural diversity. The diversity of team members and cultural diversity facilitates the courage of each individual to express his or her point of view, thus creating an atmosphere conducive to communication.<br><br>7.The driving force of opinion leaders.As long as one person steps up and is the first to speak, those who follow can feel comfortable about expressing their opinions and communicating. Because people are often waiting for the first person to appear.<br><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-02 12:09:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501002234</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. What types of collaboration are included in collective intelligence? (referring to three levels of collaboration)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501022211</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Group 1:<br>Cheng Ho Fung Keizer<br>Kwok on Ki Angel<br>Siu Chun Hin Lucas<br><br>Co-ordinated collaboration: Participants in coordinated collaboration work individually while contributing to a common objective. Each participant's work is self-contained yet is not created by them. Participants are operating on a shared object, but do not have a single aim, such that it contributes to the common goal in a coherent manner. For instance, the workers in the vehicle factory production line work separately with their own responsibilities to fulfill the factory's common objective.<br><br>Cooperative collaboration: Participants working together in this degree of collaboration are more organized and coordinated. Cooperative collaboration needs more planning and organization than coordinated collaboration because it includes more individual interaction and communication. For example, participants work together on a group project, do a study together, or pool resources to accomplish a common objective.<br><br>Co-constructive collaboration: In this type of cooperation, people cooperate to produce something original that would not have been possible if they worked alone. It calls for intense connection and conversation as well as a thorough comprehension of one another's viewpoints and advantages. Co-constructive collaboration requires a high level of interpersonal trust and cooperation. Co-constructive collaboration examples include using brainstorming sessions or design thinking workshops to develop new goods, services, or concepts.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-02 12:28:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501022211</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 2 pros and cons of collective intelligence</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501044255</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>NI Yuanjun</div><div>Yu Kefan</div><div>CHEUNG Hoi Lun</div><div>Lu Yuehan</div><div>Liu Chenyu</div><div>Zhang Zhen</div><div>Liu Haohua</div><div>Shen Zifan</div><div><br></div><div>Pros<br>integrated solution (NI Yuanjun)</div><div>As more people join the discussion of the issue, the views of everyone can be integrated to the maximum extent. So users are able to get integrated solutions when they use the platform of collective intelligence for information retrieval. Such a model helps the questioner understand the problem itself at the early stage of trying to solve it, so that he or she knows exactly what he or she needs to do to solve the problem.<br><br>Time saving, improve efficiency (Yu Kefan)</div><div>By bringing together the power of the group to solve the problem, you can get the problem solved in a short time, saving time and improving efficiency. For example, in Zhihu or other Q&amp;A-type platforms, the questioner needs to spend a lot of energy to search for solutions and answers, but by asking questions online, a large number of feasible solutions can be collected quickly.<br><br>Critical, different points of view, creativity diversity, various ideas, rich collection (For the pros of using collective intelligence.The perspective of accuracy. Especially in political area, the policy making process that involves collective intelligence is intended to be more accurate than the thoughts of only a few people, especially for lots of social issues that need different stakeholders to give their suggestions. For instance, in the decision of the conservation program, it is necessary to include the citizens but not only professionals in that domain. People from different backgrounds can generate more comprehensive policies that ensure the good for the whole society, which is more accurate to tackle the root of the problem.)(CHEUNG Hoi Lun)<br><br>Good for communication. Collective intelligence, as an open source sharing or communication platform, often has timely interaction and knowledge sharing features, which also helps collaborators communicate with each other and provide feedback on each other's opinions in a timely manner. (Lu Yuehan)<br><br>Its socially beneficial because it encourage the information sharing among different fields of interdisciplinary corporations. The Collective Intelligence Platform has no barriers and encourages people from any field to join and express their ideas. It provides the opportunity for the professional from differe​​nt domain to share their insights that facilitate the information sharing. For instance, in the concept of love in romantic relationships, sociology and psychology have different definitions to explain the flow of love.</div><div><br><br></div><div>Cons<br>Too much information (information overload) and hard to filter and evaluate: Similar to wikis and online software source code hosting service platforms, there is a huge amount of information available on the platform. Although this information can help us solve problems. But this does not mean that it is the optimal information. It is difficult to assess the quality of the information. (Liu Chenyu)</div><div>	<br>Domination: In the decision-making process, some of the members may be influenced by the others. Also, those members who advocate their own ideas, they may be forced to obey the team’s decision-making. Therefore it may result in Domination, since the opinions of the minority may be hidden. (Shen Zifan)</div><div><br>May reduce the efficiency of problem solving. Some acts of collective intelligence, such as group decision-making encourage the active participation of experts in various fields, employees, and strive to draw up the most satisfactory course of action in a democratic way. If this process is not handled properly, it can fall into the misconception of blind discussion, which wastes time and reduces the speed and efficiency of decision-making.（Zhang Zhen）<br><br>Information cocoons (Liu Haohua)</div><div>Compared with individual thinking, collaborative intelligence has the potential to reinforce the opinions and perspectives that are most widely accepted within online communities. This can lead to the spread of internet rumors and the creation of information cocoons, where people rely on common beliefs rather than conducting their own personal truth-finding. As a result, the individual who initiates the discussion or question may be less likely to think critically and more likely to accept ideas that are supported by the majority.</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-02 12:49:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/xiuyucxy/iv60fmmgo4fbit6m/wish/2501044255</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
