9/19 DIS | Fire in the Sky by

2025-09-19 15:34:00 UTC

samika agarwal- go in order of ppl there were 4 and each person said their opinion

Sneha Singhi

2025-09-19 15:34:10 UTC

Read out releveant information first and compare lists/facts

2025-09-19 15:34:14 UTC

richard ballard

Ashley Liu

2025-09-19 15:34:14 UTC

We went through everyone's rankings individually

no

2025-09-19 15:34:23 UTC

2025-09-19 15:34:32 UTC

We specifically called on everyone to ask why they ranked their top asteroid first and what clues made them choose it

No

2025-09-19 15:34:33 UTC

Each person shared their ranking and relevant info

2025-09-19 15:34:40 UTC

go in order and everyone takes a guess

2025-09-19 15:34:45 UTC

samika agarwal

2025-09-19 15:34:51 UTC

make sure the conversation was somewhat organized

No

2025-09-19 15:34:51 UTC

Sarah Lee

2025-09-19 15:34:55 UTC

everyone got to share out their rankings first and then we discussed.

Sneha Singhi

2025-09-19 15:34:57 UTC

go in the order of the people, and have each person go through why they chose a specific ranking, if they were willing to share

samika agarwal

2025-09-19 15:35:14 UTC

Share the information one by one

bp352 — 2025-09-19 15:35:17 UTC

Katie Perlitz (kap256)

2025-09-19 15:35:17 UTC

We were more likely to agree on a ranking position if multiple teammates shared a clue on it

Sarah Lee

2025-09-19 15:35:21 UTC

yes because we had to take into account overlapping information

2025-09-19 15:35:24 UTC

Justin Eburuoh jce79

2025-09-19 15:35:27 UTC

We went in order of our roles and gave reasoning behind our rankings

no

2025-09-19 15:35:29 UTC

2025-09-19 15:35:37 UTC

we shared our reasoning each at the beginning, but we ended up ranking it by adding up our different rankings

NO

bp352 — 2025-09-19 15:35:40 UTC

Sneha Singhi

2025-09-19 15:35:40 UTC

making sure that information is unique and actually brings value, and ensuring that all voices are heard

We took turns ranking each asteroid and then compared our info

2025-09-19 15:35:40 UTC

i ranked aurora first because my info said it would strike western europe; other people had it last because the info they recieved made it seem like it wasn't a big deal. richard ballard

2025-09-19 15:35:41 UTC

Runjia Qi

rq52 — 2025-09-19 15:35:42 UTC

We shared the individual technical brief to go through details

2025-09-19 15:35:46 UTC

Make sure everyone has a chance to speak, go with their rank, and have at least 5 mins to discuss their info

try to make sure everyone shares their piece of information and everyone has the same amount of information

2025-09-19 15:35:58 UTC

we often were more likely to agree on a ranking if multiple group members had similar clues regarding its lethality

2025-09-19 15:35:58 UTC

2025-09-19 15:36:05 UTC

We all went in order of our role and shared the information we have available about each asteroid. We then gave our reasoning for our individual rankings

Ashley Liu

2025-09-19 15:36:06 UTC

We didn't know what info we were missing which made it difficult to share key info. This made our rankings more biased

2025-09-19 15:36:19 UTC

we were trying to make decisions based on the common information that we had - it was hard to know what was unique

Runjia Qi

rq52 — 2025-09-19 15:36:23 UTC

We tried to find common agreement first

Ashley Liu

2025-09-19 15:36:25 UTC

xiwen zhang(xz885)

2025-09-19 15:36:31 UTC

try to make sure everyone knows the same info

rq52 — 2025-09-19 15:36:32 UTC

We make sure everyone can talk about their thoughts and we discuss all the infomation together for 10 mins

2025-09-19 15:36:33 UTC

Sneha Singhi

2025-09-19 15:36:39 UTC

We were likely to agree on something if most of the information we heard was supportive of what we wanted/

ensure the sharing process is structured and create en environment where people are encouraged to share unique information

2025-09-19 15:36:42 UTC

Justin Eburuoh jce79

2025-09-19 15:36:43 UTC

It made us just have to trust that the reasoning that our teammates gave was based on the information they were given

yes because we had different opinions of intervention necessity

2025-09-19 15:36:45 UTC

richard ballard

2025-09-19 15:36:46 UTC

We mostly went with the most votes so for example if three people chose a specific asteroid we all just went with it.

2025-09-19 15:36:48 UTC

2025-09-19 15:36:51 UTC

add structure such as meeting notes so it's easier to visualize what's known or not

Ashley Liu

2025-09-19 15:37:00 UTC

I make sure my info comes from credible sources and play devils advocate to be open to other ideas

each person shared their personal ranking and relevant info

2025-09-19 15:37:01 UTC

Justin Eburuoh jce79

2025-09-19 15:37:03 UTC

Hidden profile highly affect my ranking because some of the information are so important and will completely change my ranking.

bp352 — 2025-09-19 15:37:05 UTC

the difference in information made my rankings very different from my teammates rankings.

2025-09-19 15:37:06 UTC

rq52 — 2025-09-19 15:37:06 UTC

Make sure everyone has equal chance and amount of time to share sufficient information

Sarah Lee

2025-09-19 15:37:08 UTC

ensure there is clear communication and ensure there is trust within the team

xiwen zhang

2025-09-19 15:37:12 UTC

not sure what info we were missing

2025-09-19 15:37:12 UTC

This led to us having different rankings in the first place because some of us had crucial information on certain asteriods

I made sure everyone spoke up and shared their info

2025-09-19 15:37:16 UTC

No

2025-09-19 15:37:28 UTC

engage in group discussion, be observant for any missed info to add helpful dialogue/critique; make sure everyone is included

2025-09-19 15:37:30 UTC

richard ballard

we always make decisions together and all the conclusions are based on our information.

2025-09-19 15:37:39 UTC

xiwen zhang

2025-09-19 15:37:48 UTC

share the info via same doc, and ranking base on it\

2025-09-19 15:37:49 UTC

The hidden profile effect led our team to focus on shared facts while neglecting unique information, which caused both my own and my teammates’ rankings to drift away from the correct solution.

NO

2025-09-19 15:37:49 UTC

Justin Eburuoh jce79

2025-09-19 15:38:00 UTC

Going in turns, and allowing everyone to finish their points

2025-09-19 15:38:22 UTC

design the conversation so that both common and unique knowledge surface and get used

Try to listen to others and only share the information that is not mentioned in previous discussion

bp352 — 2025-09-19 15:38:26 UTC

2025-09-19 15:38:27 UTC

Making sure everyone's perspective and available information has been heard

Sarah Lee

2025-09-19 15:38:36 UTC

we did not know who was who so it is easier to agree on something if more context or information was shared.

we share the information one by one and make all information in the same doc

2025-09-19 15:39:03 UTC